Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -

Atlantis Explained!


Rojack

Recommended Posts

 

 

On 5/31/2023 at 6:58 AM, jmccr8 said:

And evidence of the palace is where, where is alll the material used to  build it and surely the foundation would still be there?

Most of the material from buildings would have been washed away into the canals. However, you can see many of the foundations along shallow-water beaches and inland lakes. Rising sea levels will eventually cover those areas including Florida itself. Remember, according to Plato, sea level was once 100 fee lower than it is today.

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Rojack said:

Most of the material from buildings would have been washed away into the canals. However, you can see many of the foundations along shallow-water beaches and inland lakes. Rising sea levels will eventually cover those areas including Florida itself. Remember, according to Plato, sea level was once 100 fee lower than it is today.

No, Plato never said that. 
 

cormac

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Rojack said:

Remember, according to Plato, sea level was once 100 feet lower than it is today.

Provide the specific quote where Plato says this.

Edited by Antigonos
  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Living in Florida is love to know more about these ancient building foundations. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, cormac mac airt said:

No, Plato never said that. 
 

cormac

Yes, but he's not quoting THE Plato (who died in the 4th century BCE but plato his dog.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ShadowSot said:

Living in Florida is love to know more about these ancient building foundations. 

Its called rocks, first name 'natural'.

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Antigonos said:

Provide the specific quote where Plato says this.

It is good to see a true optimist

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Hanslune said:

Its called rocks, first name 'natural'.

That's just what the beagles want you to think, maaaan. 

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/31/2023 at 6:58 AM, jmccr8 said:

Atlantis: The first royal palace sat on a hill with three  moats around it. Two and a half moats were destroyed leaving the hill and a partial moat. One spring is still in place today.  The three large canals are still in place. Plato gives their measurements. He did not mention the second royal palace.

https://goo.gl/maps/iyJGwSsD4dPC6jDd9

https://goo.gl/maps/p9pA83Pc5V4McpNW7?coh=178571&entry=tt

I am resending links to the evidence. All you have to do click on them. To understand the evidence all you must read Plato's story again.

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Rojack said:

I am resending links to the evidence. All you have to do click on them. To understand the evidence all you must read Plato's story again.

Hi Rojack

Where is the evidence of there having bedn a palace? Generally spezking there would have been many buildings near it and yet not one foundation or any associated building materials so whst did Plato have to say about that?

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Rojack said:

I am resending links to the evidence. All you have to do click on them. To understand the evidence all you must read Plato's story again.

You haven’t provided any evidence, but you have lied about what Plato said. Go back and read his texts again. 
 

cormac

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Rojack said:

Community Layout Before the Flood

https://goo.gl/maps/YgmM3A1rADtmudF67?coh=178571&entry=tt

You must read  Plato's story to understand the evidence.

Hi Rojack

A map of present day Tampa doesn't prove anything other than Tampa exists. Yoi do umderstand that if Tampa was built over a pre-existing ancient city palace included that there would be ruins and foundations found during excavations yet none habe been foumd or recorded

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Rojack said:

Community Layout Before the Flood

https://goo.gl/maps/YgmM3A1rADtmudF67?coh=178571&entry=tt

You must read  Plato's story to understand the evidence.

YOU haven’t even read Plato’s story, it’s embarrassingly obvious by your posts. 
 

cormac

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Rojack said:

Community Layout Before the Flood

https://goo.gl/maps/YgmM3A1rADtmudF67?coh=178571&entry=tt

You must read  Plato's story to understand the evidence.

In 1989 a very extensive archaeological survey of that area of Florida was done because it was undergoing a lot of rapid development and developers had to have surveys done of the land to make sure they weren't paving over any important sites.

Here's the survey report (very long) https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CZIC-sb482-t3-f6-1989/html/CZIC-sb482-t3-f6-1989.htm

They found shell middens and some burial mounds that date to 10,000 BC onward.  In fact, there is so much evidence that they were able to determine that there were around 20 different cultures in that particular area and then were even able to assign them to time periods based on a lot of other evidence.

The evidence there says that the inhabitants were PaleoIndians.  The timeline is continuous and they did not build on top of other structures nor did anyone else build on top of their sites until the 1800's or so.  The area was not used for farming and there are no stone buildings there.

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Kenemet said:

In 1989 a very extensive archaeological survey of that area of Florida was done because it was undergoing a lot of rapid development and developers had to have surveys done of the land to make sure they weren't paving over any important sites.

Here's the survey report (very long) https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CZIC-sb482-t3-f6-1989/html/CZIC-sb482-t3-f6-1989.htm

They found shell middens and some burial mounds that date to 10,000 BC onward.  In fact, there is so much evidence that they were able to determine that there were around 20 different cultures in that particular area and then were even able to assign them to time periods based on a lot of other evidence.

The evidence there says that the inhabitants were PaleoIndians.  The timeline is continuous and they did not build on top of other structures nor did anyone else build on top of their sites until the 1800's or so.  The area was not used for farming and there are no stone buildings there.

Now there you go being all sciency and showing real evidence. This thread is about implausible belief based on stubbornness and a strong demonstration of ego over reality.

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Hanslune said:

Now there you go being all sciency and showing real evidence. This thread is about implausible belief based on stubbornness and a strong demonstration of ego over reality.

Evidence

Circle: https://goo.gl/maps/iyJGwSsD4dPC6jDd9

  • Haha 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jmccr8 said:

Hi Rojack

Not sure why you keep posting links to modern day Tampa, could you explain why?

I believed that is how Florida looked during the time of Atlantis.

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Rojack said:

I believed that is how Florida looked during the time of Atlantis.

Hi Rojack

Huh, how did you come to that conclussion? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, Rojack said:

I believed that is how Florida looked during the time of Atlantis.

We went through all these supposed Tampa-Atlantis links a few months back,  and found no solid evidence at all.

Why on earth are we doing it all again now? 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rojack likes to pretend, at the time of Plato’s alleged Atlantis the sea level was some 60+ meters BELOW current sea level. The following is what that would have looked like: 

IMG_0758.thumb.jpeg.1e34655813712f90e4ee35666220ab85.jpeg
 

There would have been nothing recognizable as Tampa during that time. 
 

cormac

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Besides, everyone knows Florida is the secret location of the land of Xanth, not Atlantis. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Rojack said:

 

This thread is about implausible belief based on stubbornness and a strong demonstration of ego over reality. CHECK:

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • The topic was locked
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.