NASA wants to hear your conspiracy theories

[UM-Bot]

The space agency is producing a special Halloween video in which it will debunk user-submitted conspiracies.

https://www.unexplained-mysteries.com/news/340393/nasa-wants-to-hear-your-conspiracy-theories

[Chronus]

.....

So basically, NASA would never come out saying

"Ohhh yeah, the moon landing? Never happened."

Never would they do that.

Also before  this comment backlashes, I am not saying the moon landing was faked, I used it as an example.

 

But its like the government like "Oh Area 51, yep there are aliens there"

 

They'd never say that.

[Minimalists]

It don't matter what explanation NASA gives to any conspiracy theory nutters are not going to buy it....

[+OverSword]

I once read a book years ago that listed the amazing amount of things NASA has done on hitlers birthday.  

[Kyle98632]

42 minutes ago, OverSword said:

I once read a book years ago that listed the amazing amount of things NASA has done on hitlers birthday.  

Just wait until you see how many Big Mac McDonalds sells on Hitler's birthday.

[+OverSword]

6 minutes ago, Kyle98632 said:

Just wait until you see how many Big Mac McDonalds sells on Hitler's birthday.

You do know that the top people at NASA in it's early heyday were actually Nazi's from Germany brought here under operation paperclip, right?  

[Raptor Witness]

The motive for this is likely to try and clean up their bad record, especially as it relates to UFOs.

Even if the rationale, was that we don’t want to scare people, how much more scared are people going to be, when they find out the real truth was being hidden from them for decades?

Lies have a way of catching up with U.S., as the coronavirus has proven.

It’s far too late for NASA to come clean about anything, they are permanently damaged.

This doesn’t detract from their past success, on the contrary, it further mystifies that science would lie in the first place.

One of the problems we are facing now, is that some people see how science has lied to us about things like UFOs, and now they don’t want to believe science about the coronavirus.

There will be no “Space Force,” as President Trump has promised, there will be no accumulation of territory above our atmosphere. The line has been drawn, not by me, but by the Owner of the Earth.

Quote

Raptor Witness     2,143

•  #18 

Posted December 7, 2011

When they tried to shut up their own scientist James Hansen at NASA in 2003, the U.S. military showed their true colors. People sometimes forget that NASA is the most technologically advanced branch of the U.S. military.

No wonder they're nervous, as all three of NASA's primary North American Facilities were directly struck by historic tropical systems over a span of only three years. No other U.S. military installations were directly hit like this. 

How is it that that American people don't know about this security breach, or how you seek to murder those who would tell them? How is it that they don't know why that crack recently appeared in the Washington Monument, or the underlying reason the graves at Arlington were suddenly shaken? Do you doubt for a moment that with only a whisper they can be opened?

To the Lord of the Earth, who stands before all living things: 

Now, send your flaming sword to the West, where it was seen in the sky before my birth, and lay it upon the ground. As it melts the land, make Manifest Destiny a memory, to be replaced with a new hope, where the word "security" is meaningless.

Edited December 7, 2011 by Raptor Witness

Source

[Obviousman]

OK, let's start with this: NASA is not a branch of the US Department of Defense (spelt the way you Americans like it). There are six main branches of the US DoD:

US Army

US Navy

US Air Force

US Marine Corps (part of the Department of the Navy)

US Coast Guard

US Space Force

(I'm not including DHS, National Guard, etc)

NASA is NOT one of them.

[AstralHorus]

Almost messed up and posted this on the other moon article lol.

But how can they say, they taped over the original moon landing tapes? Super suspect lol. Can’t expect much from a bunch of “ex” nazis I suppose lol.

Edited October 26, 2020 by AstralHorus

[Obviousman]

3 hours ago, AstralHorus said:

Almost messed up and posted this on the other moon article lol.

But how can they say, they taped over the original moon landing tapes? Super suspect lol. Can’t expect much from a bunch of “ex” nazis I suppose lol.

That has all been explained and it is not 'suspicious' at all. See here.

 

If you haven't the time to read it, I am happy to provide a summary.

[AstralHorus]

No amount of explaining could explain that big of a mess up IMO. If this year has showed me anything, it’s the last people I trust are govt officials of either party.

[Rolltide]

Stand up comedy sketch

Edited October 27, 2020 by Rolltide

[Obviousman]

2 hours ago, AstralHorus said:

No amount of explaining could explain that big of a mess up IMO. If this year has showed me anything, it’s the last people I trust are govt officials of either party.

Did you read how it happened? Just in case, I'll give you a Soldier's 5:

The video footage from the Moon was taken using what was called Slow Scan TV, then transmitted to Earth. Once received, the video format wasn't suitable for transmission to TV networks, etc, so it undergoes a conversion process (in essence, it was just like the Slow Scan TV video being shown on a TV, and a TV camera (for the networks) would film the picture shown on the display).

This 'converted' footage is what went out to the world. It wasn't as good as the original SSTV footage but TVs of the day couldn't show that much detail, so the loss of resolution during the conversion wasn't a big deal. That footage is still available today and is what we normally see when we watch the Apollo 11 EVA.

   

Photos of the TV monitor that displayed the 'converted' footage taken on the day at Honeysuckle Creek

   

Photos of the TV monitor that was displaying the SSTV footage, taken on the day at Honeysuckle Creek

Years later, people who were originally there for the conversion decided to look for the original SSTV tapes. The picture from them was of better resolution and with today's technology, could even be enhanced. When they searched for the original SSTV tapes, they were no longer available... why?

• The "loss" of the SSTV tapes was not a big deal at all because NASA still had the converted footage and there was no difference between them except for resolution
• In the late 70s, NASA was using a different type of recording tape but they found out that it didn't have a long life, and was degrading far quicker than anyone expected
• There were current (unmanned) mission that needed good tapes to record telemetry, so they went into the tape archives to find tapes made from the old material, which would be erased and re-used for the new missions
• The original SSTV tapes got included in this re-use
• Once more - at the time it was not considered to be a big deal because the converted footage was available in multiple places, and there wasn't anything like HDTV so the difference in resolution wasn't of concern

So that is what happened. No subterfuge, no skulduggery. I am sure that there are many people out there who have worked for large organisation that can relate tales of a similar vein.

 

Edited October 27, 2020 by Obviousman
Amended layout of images