Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -

2020 US election


ExpandMyMind

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, DarkHunter said:

So localnews21 (??) and justthenews are your sources :D , and you are relaying their opinion pieces on a low rejection rate of mail ballots?  Wow.

Can you think of all the reasons that the rejection rate might be lower?  You know, other than fraud?  If so, why didn't you elaborate?  If not, then forgive me for finding this as not credible.

Here's a hint, maybe the forms are better.  Maybe the huge coverage of the election meant that mail-in voters were much more careful, having seen the high rejection rates from last time.  I mean, wouldn't good electoral system management involve educating voters when they see a problem?  Maybe they addressed all the issues, changed the forms, maybe people LISTENED.  I don't know, but that's just one potential reason, and unless you, trump or any media actually puts up evidence and shows a problem, then it is an utter waste of time and nothing but a delaying tactic. 

I find it rather fascinating that you and they are complaining about more people voting.......... but only those annoying largely-democrat mail-in ones.

Do you not apply the same rules about fairness, to yourself?

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry, haven't had a chance to check through the thread...

Has anyone mentioned this: https://nypost.com/2020/11/12/senate-gop-lindsey-graham-say-joe-biden-needs-intel-briefs/

I would have thought that if they thought Biden wasn't going to become President there wouldn't be any need for him to see the classified intelligence briefs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, ChrLzs said:

So localnews21 (??) and justthenews are your sources :D , and you are relaying their opinion pieces on a low rejection rate of mail ballots?  Wow.

Can you think of all the reasons that the rejection rate might be lower?  You know, other than fraud?  If so, why didn't you elaborate?  If not, then forgive me for finding this as not credible.

Here's a hint, maybe the forms are better.  Maybe the huge coverage of the election meant that mail-in voters were much more careful, having seen the high rejection rates from last time.  I mean, wouldn't good electoral system management involve educating voters when they see a problem?  Maybe they addressed all the issues, changed the forms, maybe people LISTENED.  I don't know, but that's just one potential reason, and unless you, trump or any media actually puts up evidence and shows a problem, then it is an utter waste of time and nothing but a delaying tactic. 

I find it rather fascinating that you and they are complaining about more people voting.......... but only those annoying largely-democrat mail-in ones.

Do you not apply the same rules about fairness, to yourself?

On the first large scale mail in election in PA history all the problems were fixed to somehow cause a 0.03% ballot rejection rate, which is significantly lower then the ballot rejection rate of Oregon which has been doing it for decades.  Meanwhile evidence of the secretary of state of PA changing vote counting rules around the election is ignored along with the attorney general of PA declaring a winner before election day can be ignored.  

There is also the evidence of previous elections including the primary election where far more then 0.03% of mail in ballots were rejected.

So there is your theory where PA magically solved all problems and made mail in ballots fool proof and did better than states with extensive experience on their first try or people in positions of authority in regard to the counting of ballots, who are staunch anti-Trumpers, illegally unilaterally changed voting rules to benefit Biden.  

Like them or hate them there are clear rules for the election and clear rules for who can change the rules and how.  Currently there are concerns those rules are being broken to benefit one candidate and harm another and those concerns need to be addressed.

Edited by DarkHunter
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Buzz_Light_Year said:

Analysis of Michigan Votes Reveals Unfortunate Truth of U S Voting Systems

Well worth the hour and ten minutes it takes to watch it.

What incensed me is that states are not keeping the image files for the 22 months as required by federal law in a federal election they are deleting them.

 

Say no more. You had me at the Illuminati icon.

5 hours ago, RavenHawk said:

Evidently, as far as Hunter goes, the acorn doesn’t fall too far from the tree.

 

Sure, as long as by 'evidently' you mean 'without any evidence whatsoever.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ExpandMyMind said:

Sure, as long as by 'evidently' you mean 'without any evidence whatsoever.

No.  I mean like father - like son.  They both seem to like the younger ones.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, RavenHawk said:

No.  I mean like father - like son.  They both seem to like the younger ones.

And as I was saying, there exists no evidence whatsoever for either claim.

But if you'd like to go there, we know that Trump busted into a teen pageant dressing room and we know he was named by one of Epstein's accusers.

Or does your mind only register accusations levelled at Democrats? 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nero still on Fenethylline (rectal)

Quote

Top US cybersecurity official reportedly says he expects to be fired

Christopher Krebs leads the agency that secures voting technology, which has been pushing back on misinformation about the election.

Top US cybersecurity official Christopher Krebs has told associates he expects to be fired by the White House, according to three sources familiar with the matter.

Krebs is the government’s point person on securing voting technology and is widely respected among local election officials. His agency has also been aggressively pushing back on rumors that something went wrong with the 2020 election, as Donald Trump, who refuses to concede to the president-elect, Joe Biden, contests.

The Guardian

 

Edited by toast
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Haven't been following the US election much in the UK but I've heard about these claims on social media.  How many of them are true?

 

- Counties that normally have low voter turnout had an unusually very high turnout which leads one to question if many of those votes were faked.

- Observers at several counties were forbidden to observe that no cheating was being done.

- Spoilt ballots were accepted and not rejected.

- People who voted were deceased.

- Electronic voting machines were changing Trump's votes into Biden votes across several states that used the machines.

- Ballots that were for Biden that were received in the mail after the deadline were date stamped with the preceding day's date so that they would be accepted.

- Ballots that were for Trump that were received in the mail before the deadline were deliberately withheld so that they could not be accepted.

- Ballots for Trump were thrown in the trash and not delivered.

 

 

Edited by TigerBright19
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, spartan max2 said:

Since sources are apprently not required in this thread anymore.

How do we know all the pictures of Joe aren't photoshopped :o

Because they're clips from a live cspan feed.

 

2 hours ago, ChrLzs said:

Patience is running out.  And while the clock ticks, the damage to your democracy is HUGE.  Also, Republicans are now going to be associated with this sort of behavior for many decades.  Enjoy.

 

Patience? Who's patience? Your patience? Antifas patience? What're you going to take to the streets and riot or something? Whats the deadline before patience runs out?

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, ExpandMyMind said:

Say no more. You had me at the Illuminati icon.

Sure, as long as by 'evidently' you mean 'without any evidence whatsoever.

If you would've paid attention the youtube site stated that it was an archived copy and the icon is for that site. Here is the original

It's points out the irregularities that exist in the voting data.

Quote

V. A. Shiva, the inventor of email and recipient of the first US Copyright for "EMAIL", holds four degrees from M.I.T and is a scientist-technologist, entrepreneur and educator, a Fulbright Scholar, Lemelson-MIT Awards Finalist and Westinghouse Science Talent Honors Award recipient.

https://techland.time.com/2011/11/15/the-man-who-invented-email/

So why don't you EXPANDYOURMIND. But you won't because it will challenge your narrative and narrowness of mind.

Also please ignore his credentials.  I'm sure they are substantially less then let's say Anderson Cooper.

Edited by Buzz_Light_Year
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, bee said:

 

re the bit about Dead Voters..... I saw this Tucker Carlson show on YouTube where he goes into detail about it - but now it's gone...
they must have got rid of it... :angry:

It's funny how CT minded people think that throwing out rubbish is a cover up.

Ate they perhaps referring to brain dead voters? Trump would lose in a landslide if that was the case I suspect. 

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, TigerBright19 said:

- Counties that normally have low voter turnout had an unusually very high turnout which leads one to question if many of those votes were faked.

- Observers at several counties were forbidden to observe that no cheating was being done.

- Spoilt ballots were accepted and not rejected.

- People who voted were deceased.

- Electronic voting machines were changing Trump's votes into Biden votes across several states that used the machines.

- Ballots that were for Biden that were received in the mail after the deadline were date stamped with the preceding day's date so that they would be accepted.

- Ballots that were for Trump that were received in the mail before the deadline were deliberately withheld so that they could not be accepted.

- Ballots for Trump were thrown in the trash and not delivered.

The true list is longer...that's just the stuff they're proud of.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, bee said:

 

meanwhile.... back at the Ranch....

 

Oh look....... the claim about election fraud is disputed..... well I never - what a surprise... :rolleyes:

MSM and Big Tech have been building up to this election for 4 years... planning and scheming ... 

they are hardly likely to back down now... and will do EVERYTHING they can to protect the 'Fix'...

 

Oh look another empty and of course flagged as BS trump claim with zero proof, if he had any shread of proof it would be on every headline, its not,

trump is an embarrassing,  sore loser tossing a tantrump is on the headlines, poor trump worshippers cant accept trump lost.

 

And for this question about biden creepy touching...

12 hours ago, the13bats said:

Related question, since those two images have gone so viral im guessing the girls were identified and questioned, whats the context? were they offended by biden? Were any kind of charges brought up?

I get crickets and tumbleweeds, seems trump worshipper loss desperation has become BDS,

Biden derangment syndrome, a condition where trump worshippers try to lash out at biden making up stuff about him

Because he won the election over trump, sour grapes guys, trump lost deal with it.

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't see Joe Biden's case strengthening at all here in the past couple of days...quite the opposite, in fact.

The trend is everything in a situation like this and it's looking all negative for China Joe.

If the dam breaks on his...shall we say...more unsavory connections, Joe may find himself in some sharky waters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Davros of Skaro said:

3vvswj.jpg

30908b.jpg

Proof that Biden's a pedophile or S. T. F. U. Your bullshiat is getting quite tiring.

Edited by Hankenhunter
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Davros of Skaro said:

Since you're grasping at straws, here's two solo pics. This is Biden's secret to the popularity to the living dead vote. The living dead see this as not smelling hair, but smelling brains by Creepy Sleepy Joe.

ashton-carter-makes-remarks-after-he-was

93d6e6ae817a8a3e1e271217aa07670fc1-2-joe

jkmr4-1539704404-embed-patricia-arquette

Your maturity level is on par with 5 year old. Do try to grow up a tad. That's a good boy.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Hankenhunter said:

Proof that Biden's a pedophile or ****. Your bullshiat is getting quite tiring.

Can't you see what he's doing to that poor little girl?  She's a victim.  He's a monster.

Sheeesh

Edited by ian hacktorp
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, psyche101 said:

You know, if I was president, you wouldn't have all these problems.

A potato would have been a better choice than Trump* At least a potato is good for something.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, ian hacktorp said:

I don't see Joe Biden's case strengthening at all here in the past couple of days...quite the opposite, in fact.

The trend is everything in a situation like this and it's looking all negative for China Joe.

If the dam breaks on his...shall we say...more unsavory connections, Joe may find himself in some sharky waters.

Might be those rose coloured glasses perhaps. 

images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQIcBvfM6gNyA89E8uDOzS

images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQ_-Imr8hM9zneohanXVeX

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Hankenhunter said:

A potato would have been a better choice than Trump* At least a potato is good for something.

Dude are you calling me a potato!!!

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, ian hacktorp said:

The true list is longer...that's just the stuff they're proud of.

This is all fake news , in a little while longer it will all come out.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What do you guys think the chances are that some of the connections Joe Biden made internationally...in places like China, Ukraine, Russia, etc....include people involved with the trafficking of such things as humans, drugs, and illegal arms?

Is Sleepy Creepy Joe Biden too good of a guy to have been anywhere near that stuff?

Or is he up to his chicken-neck in it...along with Bonnie and Clinton, Obomber, and a few other long-time DC luminaries?

We may not have to wait long to find out...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • The topic was locked
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.