Sidney Powell dropped by Trump Administration

[RAyMO]

3 hours ago, bee said:

there will still be evidence lurking in the meta data files I presume...? 

well given that for Trumps allegations to be true much of the population, the cia, fbi, state legislatures, national cyber security, the courts, the media, the counters, the hardware manufactures, the software writers, the postal service, etc would have to be in on it. I am sure these so called metadata files  will be in on it too. 

[bee]

4 minutes ago, RAyMO said:

most times evidence of a crime is found then investigated - Trumpists not surprisingly work the other way - declare crimes and then look for evidence. Not surprisingly such an **** about face approach fails.  

If crime is suspected then investigations take place and evidence is gathered... nothing new there...

 

[RAyMO]

Just now, bee said:

If crime is suspected then investigations take place and evidence is gathered... nothing new there...

 

the suspicion is usually preceded with evidence. Look our bank account is 50k short of where it was yesterday - leads to suspicion of a crime. it remains suspicion until they discover the partner just bought himself a new car. 

Trump lost Bee, it was obvious he was going to lose for months, even trump knew and started moulding the pliable about rigged elections many months before said elections. He didn't need proof, his ego needed an excuse, and sadly many people bought it. 

[the13bats]

9 minutes ago, bee said:

If crime is suspected then investigations take place and evidence is gathered... nothing new there...

 

 

Bee you iirc are not in America not a citizen, please in a very short non typical or convoluted way tell me why you so deeply worship trump, does your worship go past politics hes a political disaster,  do you worship him as the man, if he asked would you marry him?  , why does American politics matter so greatly to you? And last why do you believe so many conspiracy theories?

[bee]

9 minutes ago, RAyMO said:

the suspicion is usually preceded with evidence. Look our bank account is 50k short of where it was yesterday - leads to suspicion of a crime. it remains suspicion until they discover the partner just bought himself a new car. 

Anomalous voting patterns is just one jump off point re suspicions... ie. when Trump is winning and the vote count is halted ---- then hey presto vast numbers of votes for Biden appear as if by magic...putting Biden in the lead...
 

9 minutes ago, RAyMO said:

Trump lost Bee, it was obvious he was going to lose for months, even trump knew and started moulding the pliable about rigged elections many months before said elections. He didn't need proof, his ego needed an excuse, and sadly many people bought it. 

 

I'd say it was the opposite... it was obvious that Trump would win a free and fair election...

But it's not just about Trump anymore... it's about saving the US Democratic Republic from enemies - foreign and domestic...

 

[RAyMO]

54 minutes ago, bee said:

Anomalous voting patterns is just one jump off point re suspicions... ie. when Trump is winning and the vote count is halted ---- then hey presto vast numbers of votes for Biden appear as if by magic...putting Biden in the lead.

that has been explained multiple times - trump himself even predicted it would happen because it is a NATURAL feature of not readying mail in ballots for counting in advance which Republican states refused to do. 

And claims such as that one have been debunked many times. No magic involved. 

Edited November 30, 2020 by RAyMO

[RAyMO]

55 minutes ago, bee said:

was obvious that Trump would win a free and fair election...

He was never in the running to win a second- his popularity throughout his presidency never got above his narrow base  - DEMs were fooled by the opinion polls last time (2016) and didn't vote thinking that Hilary would win, this time they took no chances and got out there. 

[Setton]

On 11/28/2020 at 5:05 AM, and then said:

Care to link me to sites that are arguing FOR Trump?  I mean, for you to be so dogmatic in your pronouncements, surely you've researched what Trump's lawyers have presented as evidence?  There is a huge body of sworn statements, along with multiple irregularities that CANNOT be dismissed before they are heard in SCOTUS.  Just to name a couple:  Biden underperformed HRC in every precinct in the country except for those in major blue cities in battleground states, and every one of those cities had huge numbers of votes that could not be observed in a bipartisan way.  You seem to think that's a petty, unnecessary step but state laws disagree.  

PA could have 600K votes dumped due to the PA Supreme court effectively changing the rules set by their legislators.  The Constitution is very clear about where the sole authority to manage "times, places and manner of state elections"  When that argument makes its way to SCOTUS it is so plainly expressed that only a corrupt judge would ignore what was done.  ONLY THE LEGISLATURE has the right to change times, places and manner and when the judicial fiat came down to bypass the law where ALL votes had to be in hand no later than 8PM, they effectively nullified every vote that wasn't in by 8.  These idiots didn't just cheat, they went full stupid and lazy in that cheating and they're going to realize that soon.

But enough of this back and forth.  You won't give any of the information any credence because it goes against your BOM outlook.  Just don't be too stressed if things don't exactly finish the way you believe they should.

So your entire argument rests on the claim that too many people got to vote and the result reflects the will of the people too well.

Even for you, that's an.... interesting... line to take.

[Setton]

1 hour ago, RAyMO said:

that has been explained multiple times - trump himself even predicted it would happen because it is a NATURAL feature of not readying mail in ballots for counting in advance which Republican states refused to do. 

And claims such as that one have been debunked many times. No magic involved. 

What I can't believe is that these nutjobs think the democrats could orchestrate a coup on this scale, without leaving a single shred of evidence, but never thought to space out the 'fake ballots'.

[quillius]

5 hours ago, RAyMO said:

He was never in the running to win a second- his popularity throughout his presidency never got above his narrow base  - DEMs were fooled by the opinion polls last time (2016) and didn't vote thinking that Hilary would win, this time they took no chances and got out there. 

what is quite interesting was the betting throughout. Biden was always favourite but it was very close.

On the morning after the election Trump became a heavy odds on favourite....over £10m staked on one betting site alone. 

If it was that obvious Biden would win still due to mail in votes, or if Trump was never in the running to win- then the odds would never have swung like they did. These were not small £10 bets, there were very many large stakes overnight.

So I cant agree he was never in the running because the odds and volume of bets suggested otherwise. 

The betting patterns were very strange indeed. 

on another side note, I probably would not refer to 70m plus as a 'narrow base'.....maybe thats not what you meant by the term 'narrow'?

On a personal note I did have a fair bet on Trump and could have cashed out with huge profit in the morning but I held on (greedily) and now lost the lot...well nearly - bookies havent settled bets yet

[spartan max2]

 

Info on the voting machines order in the two Georgia counties. 

Quote

A judge assigned to a Republican-led lawsuit alleging widespread fraud in the presidential election in Georgia issued an order late Sunday night blocking plans to wipe or reset voting machines used in three counties in the state.

U.S. District Judge Timothy Batten Sr. revealed in his four-page directive that he held a hearing via Zoom Sunday evening on the suit — one of two cases filed in federal courts last week by Sidney Powell, an outspoken Texas attorney who joined President Donald Trump’s legal team earlier this month only to be dismissed from it a few days later.

https://www-politico-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.politico.com/amp/news/2020/11/30/judge-freezes-voting-machines-georgia-counties-441342?amp_js_v=a6&amp_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQFKAGwASA%3D#aoh=16067544536071&csi=1&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From %1%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.politico.com%2Fnews%2F2020%2F11%2F30%2Fjudge-freezes-voting-machines-georgia-counties-441342

Edited November 30, 2020 by spartan max2

[acidhead]

5 hours ago, RAyMO said:

He was never in the running to win a second- his popularity throughout his presidency never got above his narrow base  - DEMs were fooled by the opinion polls last time (2016) and didn't vote thinking that Hilary would win, this time they took no chances and got out there. 

If Trumps popularity never got above his narrow base in 2016 explain how he received 11 million more votes in 2020?

[spartan max2]

11 minutes ago, President-Elect Acidhead said:

If Trumps popularity never got above his narrow base in 2016 explain how he received 11 million more votes in 2020?

Just higher voter turnout and a bigger population.

Biden also got millions of more votes then Hillary did in 2016. Technically, Biden got the highest amount of votes ever for a presidential candidate.

Edited November 30, 2020 by spartan max2

[RAyMO]

52 minutes ago, President-Elect Acidhead said:

If Trumps popularity never got above his narrow base in 2016 explain how he received 11 million more votes in 2020?

thats the fraud that should be investigated!

[Tatetopa]

7 hours ago, bee said:

I'd say it was the opposite... it was obvious that Trump would win a free and fair election...

You have spent the last 4 years describing and ridiculing our advanced state of TDS and yet you don't believe that has the power to cause people to come out and vote?   To us, it is totally obvious that Trump would lose a free and fair election.

[+and-then]

12 hours ago, bee said:

If crime is suspected then investigations take place and evidence is gathered... nothing new there...

 

 

[the13bats]

11 hours ago, Setton said:

So your entire argument rests on the claim that too many people got to vote and the result reflects the will of the people too well.

Even for you, that's an.... interesting... line to take.

Early on trump said that too. If lots more people voted no way he could win then later he tacked on the made up voter fraud part and sure enough his worshippers downed it like so much tainted Tang.

[the13bats]

7 hours ago, President-Elect Acidhead said:

If Trumps popularity never got above his narrow base in 2016 explain how he received 11 million more votes in 2020?

Hum, perhaps that investigation of vote fraud was looking in the wrong camp, ty for pointing this out.

[acidhead]

9 hours ago, spartan max2 said:

Just higher voter turnout and a bigger population.

Biden also got millions of more votes then Hillary did in 2016. Technically, Biden got the highest amount of votes ever for a presidential candidate.

How many counties did Biden win compared to Hillary in 2016?

[+and-then]

For those who are still prattling on about there being "NO EVIDENCE".  Huge amounts of corroboration are being presented that indicates a conspiracy to defraud this election.  Ignoring it or laughing at it doesn't negate the evidence.  Political hack judges at the state level doesn't EITHER.  SCOTUS will make a judgment at some point and the most equitable Constitutional remedy will be to send this decision to the House for a "contingent election".  

Spamming multiple threads as though sheer volume of noise is going to ward off the reality that could blow up in their face, isn't going to stop what's coming.  The fear is beginning to be palpable.  If Trump manages to evade this coup and be re-inaugurated, he should IMMEDIATELY round these traitors up and send them to Gitmo for military tribunals.  They've gone too far and a price is going to be required.  He should also fire most of the Generals and Admirals who are submerged in the Pentagon.  The irony of all this BS that the Left have been pushing for 4 years is that they may finally be about to experience a massive, very non-PC attack by this administration.  

THIS attack against our Republic needs to be crushed so thoroughly that the traitors are permanently removed and ANY who escape will know what they have coming if they try it again.  

Those here who are going to laugh or accuse me of being a nutter should probably have a care.  Tens of millions of Americans are waking up and are going to DEMAND justice.  The faint of heart need to get ready to hide under a bed for awhile 

[Golden Duck]

13 minutes ago, and then said:

For those who are still prattling on about there being "NO EVIDENCE".  Huge amounts of corroboration are being presented that indicates a conspiracy to defraud this election.  Ignoring it or laughing at it doesn't negate the evidence.  Political hack judges at the state level doesn't EITHER.  SCOTUS will make a judgment at some point and the most equitable Constitutional remedy will be to send this decision to the House for a "contingent election".  

Spamming multiple threads as though sheer volume of noise is going to ward off the reality that could blow up in their face, isn't going to stop what's coming.  The fear is beginning to be palpable.  If Trump manages to evade this coup and be re-inaugurated, he should IMMEDIATELY round these traitors up and send them to Gitmo for military tribunals.  They've gone too far and a price is going to be required.  He should also fire most of the Generals and Admirals who are submerged in the Pentagon.  The irony of all this BS that the Left have been pushing for 4 years is that they may finally be about to experience a massive, very non-PC attack by this administration.  

THIS attack against our Republic needs to be crushed so thoroughly that the traitors are permanently removed and ANY who escape will know what they have coming if they try it again.  

Those here who are going to laugh or accuse me of being a nutter should probably have a care.  Tens of millions of Americans are waking up and are going to DEMAND justice.  The faint of heart need to get ready to hide under a bed for awhile 

H E L P

[the13bats]

 

1 hour ago, and then said:

For those who are still prattling on about there being "NO EVIDENCE".  Huge amounts of corroboration are being presented that indicates a conspiracy to defraud this election

How do you choose which words you capitalize to try to look more epic?

You spamming multiple threads as though sheer volume of your empty noise makes your nothings into something isnt working at all, people were laughing hard at you thinking you were a "nutter" or certifiably Meshuga but most of that has turned to concern from your trump lost desperation syndrome.

Its a bit ironic that you cry your messiah was cheated out of the 2020 yet by some form of delusion if a judge trump appointed bent a corrupt knee and stole the legit votes from U.S. citizens and handed it to trump that type dishonestly is okay with you, very twisted.

Anyway, Rather than you prattling on as you just did while presenting nothing except your empty raving diatribe why not just cut to the chase and persent this huge amount of evidence you boast of, if you saw it you could certainly cut and paste it, so no excuses or insults just post it already.

 

[bee]

6 hours ago, and then said:

For those who are still prattling on about there being "NO EVIDENCE".  Huge amounts of corroboration are being presented that indicates a conspiracy to defraud this election.  Ignoring it or laughing at it doesn't negate the evidence.  Political hack judges at the state level doesn't EITHER.  SCOTUS will make a judgment at some point and the most equitable Constitutional remedy will be to send this decision to the House for a "contingent election".  

I'm no expert on these matters - but as an interested outsider - from what I've seen in the last couple of weeks regarding evidence of Election Fraud - (ie - there's a lot of it in one form or another)  this seems the most likely outcome... that at some point  the SCOTUS will pass the responsibility over to the House -  one vote per state...

Then doesn't the Senate chose the VP...?.... and if there is a Dem majority at that point (depending on Georgia voting..)

Perhaps the Senate will pick................................Biden.................

So you could have Trump AND Biden winning - that might calm the protesters / looters / rioters down a bit... (but maybe not)

 

[the13bats]

8 minutes ago, bee said:

So you could have Trump AND Biden winning - that might calm the protesters / looters / rioters down a bit... (but maybe not)

That would be hillarious but no, biden won fair and square ( ive seen zero evidence to back up voter fraud claims ) trump will have to accept it and try for the 2024 indy ticket

[bee]

24 minutes ago, the13bats said:

That would be hillarious but no, biden won fair and square ( ive seen zero evidence to back up voter fraud claims ) trump will have to accept it and try for the 2024 indy ticket

 

bolded..... when you have your eyes tight shut, fingers in ears going la la la... you're not going to... 

the evidence is mounting - for example statistical evidence - big picture data evidence that can take a bit of time to examine and analyze  -(honest) judges will need help to properly understand all the data and computer stuff I think -  

 

Edited December 1, 2020 by bee