Time Magazine: Left-Wing Election Conspiracy

[ian hacktorp]

Looks like left-wing propaganda rag Time Magazine is trying to get ahead of the approaching tsunami of election-fraud proof that is coming in the wake of Trump's "impeachment" and the likely involvement by the US military (esp. Space Force) in determining what that proof-of-fraud means for the US presidency going forward.

How are they trying to do this?  Apparently, they are admitting that a conspiracy between leftist operatives and wealthy business elites DID exist (hard to deny, given the proof), but that said conspiracy was 'necessary' to protect "our democracy".

Obviously, the keen-eyed observer will instantly see the irony and sickening hypocrisy of any group of conspirators working to subvert democratic processes in the name of "protecting democracy", but I'm sure, given that this is the fascist oligarchs and their leftist thugs we're talking about, no one will be particularly surprised.

Still, this should be fun to watch...shouldn't it?

(Ian's latest predictions:  Biden removed by 25th Amendment within 2 weeks; Harris presidency declared illegitimate almost immediately; Trump inaugurated again by April)

Cheers!

Time Magazine: ‘Secret,’ ‘Well-funded Cabal’ Worked to ‘Protect’ 2020 Election

Quote

Time magazine has published a detailed account of what it describes as a “conspiracy” between “left-wing activists and business titans” to create “an extraordinary shadow effort” to “protect” the 2020 presidential election.

The New York Times had reported on the effort in January, referring to the “Democracy Defense Coalition.” The Daily Beast hinted at it in the fall. But the Time article is the most in-depth report at what others suggested was going on behind the scenes.

The article by Molly Ball, titled “The Secret History of the Shadow Campaign That Saved the 2020 Election,” presents the effort as a heroic effort to preserve a free and fair election, and to fend off President Donald Trump’s anticipated claims of fraud.

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2021/02/05/time-magazine-secret-well-funded-cabal-worked-to-protect-2020-election/

Edited February 5, 2021 by ian hacktorp

[Autochthon1990]

8 minutes ago, ian hacktorp said:

Looks like left-wing propaganda rag Time Magazine is trying to get ahead of the approaching tsunami of election-fraud proof that is coming in the wake of Trump's "impeachment" and the likely involvement by the US military (esp. Space Force) in determining what that proof-of-fraud means for the US presidency going forward.

How are they trying to do this?  Apparently, they are admitting that a conspiracy between leftist operatives and wealthy business elites DID exist (hard to deny, given the proof), but that said conspiracy was 'necessary' to protect "our democracy".

Obviously, the keen-eyed observer will instantly see the irony and sickening hypocrisy of any group of conspirators working to subvert democratic processes in the name of "protecting democracy", but I'm sure, given that this is the fascist oligarchs and their leftist thugs we're talking about, no one will be particularly surprised.

Still, this should be fun to watch...shouldn't it?

(Ian's latest predictions:  Biden removed by 25th Amendment within 2 weeks; Harris presidency declared illegitimate almost immediately; Trump inaugurated again by April)

Cheers!

Time Magazine: ‘Secret,’ ‘Well-funded Cabal’ Worked to ‘Protect’ 2020 Election

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2021/02/05/time-magazine-secret-well-funded-cabal-worked-to-protect-2020-election/

Since when is "Professionals work together to ensure chaos doesn't erupt" a bad thing? I mean sure Breitbart probably phrased it as "Deep state uses spirit cooked babies to force trump to concede" but they're about has reliable as the madman who tried to jack my laptop in Spokane.

[ian hacktorp]

2 minutes ago, Autochthon1990 said:

Since when is "Professionals work together to ensure chaos doesn't erupt" a bad thing?

Since forever, when it's done to subvert democratic processes, silly.

Flimsy excuses not withstanding.

[Autochthon1990]

Just now, ian hacktorp said:

Since forever, when it's done to subvert democratic processes, silly.

Flimsy excuses not withstanding.

Neat, got proof that happened? Because they tried to prove that sixty times and came up with nothing every time. 

[ian hacktorp]

1 minute ago, Autochthon1990 said:

Neat, got proof that happened? Because they tried to prove that sixty times and came up with nothing every time. 

Nobody has tried to prove anything...yet.  No court has heard any evidence so far.  Remember?

Read the OP again; Trump's impeachment will kick the whole thing off.

[Autochthon1990]

1 minute ago, ian hacktorp said:

Nobody has tried to prove anything...yet.  No court has heard any evidence so far.  Remember?

Read the OP again; Trump's impeachment will kick the whole thing off.

Incorrect, the lawyer presented evidence, the judge took one look at it and deemed it inadmissible. Sixty. Times.

 

You lost, fair and square, get over it, and learn to cope. If you think Biden has done something illegal after entering office, do what we did and try to impeach him. Other then that, sit down, and get used to it like we did with the last guy.

[rashore]

Some information about Presidential Succession for folks: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CHRG-108hhrg96287/html/CHRG-108hhrg96287.htm

There's a whole lotta folks that would get sworn in if for some reason both Biden and Harris were removed from office. Trump is not any of those people. 

[ian hacktorp]

38 minutes ago, Autochthon1990 said:

Incorrect, the lawyer presented evidence, the judge took one look at it and deemed it inadmissible. Sixty. Times.

You are woefully uninformed as to how the courts work and what has actually happened so far.

Judges ruled on "standing" not evidence, in refusing these cases.  No evidence was deemed inadmissible.

Further, lawsuits by Powell, Wood, and others, HAVE been admitted and are nearing trial.  Evidence will be heard.

Edited February 5, 2021 by ian hacktorp

[ian hacktorp]

5 minutes ago, rashore said:

Some information about Presidential Succession for folks: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CHRG-108hhrg96287/html/CHRG-108hhrg96287.htm

There's a whole lotta folks that would get sworn in if for some reason both Biden and Harris were removed from office. Trump is not any of those people. 

This assumes that the election wasn't fraudulently stolen.  A risky assumption.

What do you think might happen if the election IS proven to have been fraudulently stolen?

[Autochthon1990]

1 minute ago, ian hacktorp said:

You are woefully uninformed as to how the courts work and what has actually happened so far.

Judges ruled on "standing" not evidence, in refusing these case.  No evidence was deemed inadmissible.

Further, lawsuits by Powell, Wood, and others, HAVE been admitted and are nearing trial.  Evidence will be heard.

https://www.ft.com/content/20b114b5-5419-493b-9923-a918a2527931

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/nevada-trump-lawsuit-dismissed/2020/12/04/844d420a-3682-11eb-a997-1f4c53d2a747_story.html

https://apnews.com/article/donald-trump-courts-election-results-e1297d874f45d2b14bc99c403abd0457

TL:DR: Nope.

[ian hacktorp]

14 minutes ago, Autochthon1990 said:

If you think Biden has done something illegal after entering office, do what we did and try to impeach him.

Thanks, but the illegal stuff he did BEFORE sitting his phony self down in his fake "Oval Office" is more than enough to get the job done.

He's finished...and first by his own people.

[Autochthon1990]

Just now, ian hacktorp said:

Thanks, but the illegal stuff he did BEFORE sitting his phony self down in his fake "Oval Office" is more than enough to get the job done.

He's finished...and first by his own people.

I see, and do you have proof of any of this?

[rashore]

5 minutes ago, ian hacktorp said:

This assumes that the election wasn't fraudulently stolen.  A risky assumption.

What do you think might happen if the election IS proven to have been fraudulently stolen?

The same line of succession applies, the legal language is what it is. Though if that were to happen, it would then be plausible that the act could be amended to reflect such a scenario, and what the line of succession would be in that scenario- or if it would change at all from the current one. 

[ian hacktorp]

And, speaking of Space Force, it seems clear that the Biden people have some nervousness about the new branch of the US Military.  Is it because they have no open channel of communication?  Remember, one of Space Force's mandates is collection of satellite intelligence:

 

[+and-then]

8 minutes ago, ian hacktorp said:

This assumes that the election wasn't fraudulently stolen.  A risky assumption.

What do you think might happen if the election IS proven to have been fraudulently stolen?

Frankly?  The Democrat Party, Swamp and the Globalists would spontaneously combust.  There would be NO WAY to avoid massive conflict and chaos.  IF proof is provided it would never meet the standard of the Left.  They'd simply deny it and continue with the same mantra until actual conflict broke out.

Don't misunderstand me, if that proof is available and the military moved to install Trump because he was illegally denied a second term, I'd support it with no qualms regardless of the cost to this nation because if cheating is allowed to stand this nation is over, anyway.

IF such proof is presented then everyone knowingly involved with the treason should have their day in court but upon conviction they should be executed OR spend the rest of their life in prison.

[Autochthon1990]

Just now, and then said:

Frankly?  The Democrat Party, Swamp and the Globalists would spontaneously combust.  There would be NO WAY to avoid massive conflict and chaos.  IF proof is provided it would never meet the standard of the Left.  They'd simply deny it and continue with the same mantra until actual conflict broke out.

Don't misunderstand me, if that proof is available and the military moved to install Trump because he was illegally denied a second term, I'd support it with no qualms regardless of the cost to this nation because if cheating is allowed to stand this nation is over, anyway.

IF such proof is presented then everyone knowingly involved with the treason should have their day in court but upon conviction they should be executed OR spend the rest of their life in prison.

Oh I see, you're just in a death cult. Cool. 

[+and-then]

2 minutes ago, rashore said:

The same line of succession applies, the legal language is what it is. Though if that were to happen, it would then be plausible that the act could be amended to reflect such a scenario, and what the line of succession would be in that scenario- or if it would change at all from the current one. 

While I fully support holding traitors responsible for their harm they did to America, I have no doubts about the firestorm this scenario would touch off.

[ian hacktorp]

2 minutes ago, rashore said:

The same line of succession applies, the legal language is what it is. Though if that were to happen, it would then be plausible that the act could be amended to reflect such a scenario, and what the line of succession would be in that scenario- or if it would change at all from the current one. 

Yeah, it seems unlikely that Trump would be told "You actually won, Mr. President, but now Nancy Pelosi is in charge."

A nice pipe-dream for Dems, perhaps...but it won't happen.

[+and-then]

Just now, Autochthon1990 said:

Oh I see, you're just in a death cult. Cool. 

Whatever... treason against the government of the U.S. by a U.S. citizen is a VERY serious charge.  If a group of Americans knowingly conspired to steal a presidential election then they deserve the maximum penalty.

[ian hacktorp]

3 minutes ago, and then said:

Frankly?  The Democrat Party, Swamp and the Globalists would spontaneously combust.  There would be NO WAY to avoid massive conflict and chaos.  IF proof is provided it would never meet the standard of the Left.  They'd simply deny it and continue with the same mantra until actual conflict broke out.

Many are saying what is happening in Myanmar right now is a microcosm of what is about to happen here.  They are watching public reaction closely there.

Remember, Myanmar's leaders were installed illegally by Obama-Clinton, using Dominion voting systems.  Their military has taken over.

Myanmar is also, by no coincidence, a human-and-drugs-trafficking hub.

[Autochthon1990]

1 minute ago, ian hacktorp said:

Many are saying what is happening in Myanmar right now is a microcosm of what is about to happen here.  They are watching public reaction closely there.

Remember, Myanmar's leaders were installed illegally by Obama-Clinton, using Dominion voting systems.  Their military has taken over.

Myanmar is also, by no coincidence, a human-and-drugs-trafficking hub.

Once again, I'm going to ask you for /proof/ on the second paragraph's claims. ACTUAL proof. Not "Q said so", "This meme makes sense", or any of that other ****e you seem to think passes as evidence. 

[ian hacktorp]

3 minutes ago, Autochthon1990 said:

Once again, I'm going to ask you for /proof/ on the second paragraph's claims. ACTUAL proof. Not "Q said so", "This meme makes sense", or any of that other ****e you seem to think passes as evidence. 

You're just going to have to be patient.  You know, like grown-ups.

[Autochthon1990]

1 minute ago, ian hacktorp said:

You're just going to have to be patient.  You know, like grown-ups.

So you have no actual evidence for your wild claims? Then nobody is going to take anything you say seriously.

[ian hacktorp]

1 minute ago, Autochthon1990 said:

Then nobody is going to take anything you say seriously

Aww...you're breaking my heart...

[Golden Duck]

18 minutes ago, ian hacktorp said:

Many are saying what is happening in Myanmar right now is a microcosm of what is about to happen here.  They are watching public reaction closely there.

Remember, Myanmar's leaders were installed illegally by Obama-Clinton, using Dominion voting systems.  Their military has taken over.

Myanmar is also, by no coincidence, a human-and-drugs-trafficking hub.

"Many are saying..."

Dominion Voting Systems were not used in Burma.