First ever footage of Bigfoot?

[Harte]

5 hours ago, Inn Spectre said:

Readers shouldn't need help doing that for themselves.

Obviously, at least one reader does.

Harte

[jmccr8]

I've lost track which first footage is this

[Resume]

5 hours ago, closed for business said:

I've lost track which first footage is this

It's the not bigfoot one . . .  wait, that doesn't narrow it down, does it?

[jmccr8]

1 minute ago, Resume said:

It's the not bigfoot one . . .  wait, that doesn't narrow it down, does it?

Hi Resume

I am a simple man so would expect that we only have 2 feet to work with for starts so is it a left or right

[Resume]

13 minutes ago, closed for business said:

Hi Resume

I am a simple man so would expect that we only have 2 feet to work with for starts so is it a left or right

I'm not sure of footie's politics.

[CRIPTIC CHAMELEON]

Just a person you can see the coat open when he jumps also arms not long enough.

[Harte]

16 hours ago, CRIPTIC CHAMELEON said:

Just a person you can see the coat open when he jumps also arms not long enough.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't believe Bigfoots sweep like that.

They all use push brooms, IIRC.

Harte

[Abramelin]

On 2/18/2021 at 9:50 PM, papageorge1 said:

Papameter time:

Bigfoot  50%     Human  40%       Hoax 10%

Factor: 1962 was before the main Bigfoot craze. 

Abrameter:

Bigfoot 0% Human 90% Hoax 10%

 

[papageorge1]

15 minutes ago, Abramelin said:

Abrameter:

Bigfoot 0% Human 90% Hoax 10%

 

So why is Bigfoot not even possible here? 

Edited August 14, 2021 by papageorge1

[Abramelin]

9 minutes ago, papageorge1 said:

So why is Bigfoot not even possible here? 

Once there is real coverage of bf to compare with, then bf is a possibility.

I haven't seen any in all these years.

Edited August 14, 2021 by Abramelin

[papageorge1]

3 minutes ago, Abramelin said:

Once there is real coverage of bf to compare with, then bf is a possibility.

I haven't seen any in all these years.

You mean the Higgs Boson couldn't have existed a million years ago???? It apparently takes what you accept as 'real coverage' before it can even be considered a possibility? Not seeing the logic of 0%.

[Abramelin]

Just now, papageorge1 said:

You mean the Higgs Boson couldn't have existed a million years ago???? It apparently takes what you accept as 'real coverage' before it can even be considered a possibility? Not seeing the logic of 0%.

Your reasoning, your 'logic', fails.

The Higgs-Boson particle was a theory, and scientific experiments proved it to exist.

 

 

[papageorge1]

4 minutes ago, Abramelin said:

Your reasoning, your 'logic', fails.

The Higgs-Boson particle was a theory, and scientific experiments proved it to exist.

 

 

So all the alleged Bigfoot videos/photos and experiences can't allow a Bigfoot theory to be created that is awaiting proof? Bigfoot is logically possible and not 0% certainly.

Edited August 14, 2021 by papageorge1

[Abramelin]

3 minutes ago, papageorge1 said:

So all the alleged Bigfoot videos/photos and experiences can't allow a Bigfoot theory to be created that is awaiting proof? Bigfoot is logically possible and not 0% certainly.

There are accounts, depictions and myths of unicorns.

What does your Papameter say about unicorns?

 

[papageorge1]

Just now, Abramelin said:

There are accounts, depictions and myths of unicorns.

What does your Papameter say about unicorns?

 

Ahh, changing the subject. Papameter sees a huge difference in the higher quantity, quality and consistency of Bigfoot accounts than unicorn accounts. Bigfoot is at 98% and the Unicorn at essentially zero.

[Abramelin]

4 minutes ago, papageorge1 said:

Ahh, changing the subject. Papameter sees a huge difference in the higher quantity, quality and consistency of Bigfoot accounts than unicorn accounts. Bigfoot is at 98% and the Unicorn at essentially zero.

There are rhinos with only one horn.

So, in essence, they are unicorns.

But not as gracile (and horse-like) as those we know from myths.

So, your meter has failed, again.

Bigfoot photos and videos are all blurry. Maybe except the Patterson film. But as far as I remember, that one was a hoax.

 

[papageorge1]

2 minutes ago, Abramelin said:

There are rhinos with only one horn.

So, in essence, they are unicorns.

 

 

 

[Abramelin]

6 minutes ago, Abramelin said:

So, your meter has failed, again.

 

[Abramelin]

Something else:

Polar bears apparently happen to occasionally kill walruses by throwing stones on their skulls.

That you can read about in the Natural World subforum of this site.

Now, grizzly bears are close kin to polar bears; they mix genes regularly and give birth to live offspring.

So couldn't it be possible that it were grizzlies throwing stones at people, instead of bf?

Imagine the view: something 7 feet tall, standing upright, throwing stones at you.

That would be Big Foot to you, right?

Edited to add:

https://www.unexplained-mysteries.com/forum/topic/349642-polar-bears-take-down-walruses-by-hurling-rocks-and-ice/

 

 

Edited August 14, 2021 by Abramelin

[Trelane]

@Abramelin, you would have more productivity stapling water to a tree then discussing items with PG.

[Abramelin]

1 minute ago, Trelane said:

@Abramelin, you would have more productivity stapling water to a tree then discussing items with PG.

I love discussing.

Even with Papa.