Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -
Carnoferox

Alleged thylacine photos to be released

74 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Carnoferox

The Thylacine Awareness Group of Australia is claiming to have captured photos of three thylacines using a camera trap, two adults and a joey, that they will release on March 1.

 

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 2
  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hyperionxvii

Tasmanian Tiger? We'll see. I'm guessing we never hear anymore about this, would be cool if true. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Carnoferox

Personally I have no faith in these claims. Neil Waters has promoted dubious "thylacine" footage that more likely showed mangy foxes/dogs on more than one occasion.

https://www.earthtouchnews.com/wtf/wtf/has-a-living-thylacine-finally-been-spotted-probably-not/

https://www.sciencealert.com/people-are-freaking-out-over-this-alleged-sighting-of-an-extinct-tasmanian-tiger

  • Like 3
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Carnoferox

There's also this frankly hilarious video from Waters' Thylacine Awareness Group that claims these photos are "thylacines".

 

  • Haha 3
  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Coyote Speaks

It would be good to hear Nick Mooney's take on it all, though, since the footage has been sent in to him.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Jon the frog
10 minutes ago, Carnoferox said:

There's also this frankly hilarious video from Waters' Thylacine Awareness Group that claims these photos are "thylacines".

 

Well... classic foggy photos...

In all these pictures trap, I would be glad to see all good photos taken of all species present on their site for comparison. It's always a lone and bad picture of something without any way to compare size and coloration...

Edited by Jon the frog
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Coyote Speaks

I'm encouraged by the fact that there are supposedly multiple animals within the photo, and that one of them is in pretty clear focus from the description. It would be easier to judge whether it's just a mangy fox or dog if everything is in better focus... and the fact that Nick Mooney will have a chance to weigh in is also rather good. The Tasmania location also encourages me, as does the fact that the past year has been a good one for wildlife sightings in general. Strange things have been cropping up with humans being less active on the planet. Now would, theoretically, be a good time for a thylacine to rear its head if they are still out there.

All that having been said, yes, there is a good chance that this is just more nothing... but thylacines still being out there is one of the less fringy things to believe in, imo. Continued decent sightings through the 70s work in their favor.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
the13bats

Why the holding back to release the pic is he taking bids from tabloids?

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Myles

I'm hopeful but don't have my hopes up too high.  Waters name being attached makes me skeptical.  

 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hyperionxvii
2 hours ago, Carnoferox said:

There's also this frankly hilarious video from Waters' Thylacine Awareness Group that claims these photos are "thylacines".

 

Umm, they look like some sort of marsupial rat, which I suppose there's plenty of down under there. Does not look anything like a Tasmanian Tiger. Just my non expert opinion. 

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Carnoferox
13 minutes ago, Hyperionxvii said:

Umm, they look like some sort of marsupial rat, which I suppose there's plenty of down under there. Does not look anything like a Tasmanian Tiger. Just my non expert opinion. 

A pademelon and/or wallaby are my guesses.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Carnoferox

Nick Mooney of the Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery has confirmed that the photos are pademelons and not thylacines. Who could’ve guessed that Neil would make the same mistake again? :lol:

 

Edited by Carnoferox
  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Skulduggery

Been following in the subreddit High Strangeness. Someone claiming to be a member of the team who found the footage has left comments.

Not too sure what to make of it but if true, would be a great find.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
oldrover
4 hours ago, Carnoferox said:

Nick Mooney of the Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery has confirmed that the photos are pademelons and not thylacines. Who could’ve guessed that Neil would make the same mistake again? :lol:

 

I for one am absolutely astounded. I never saw that coming.

  • Like 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
psyche101

Ive spotted a Thylacine.

Here's the proof.

images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQ7cgnVkg7pz5WOq4Orbo_

  • Haha 9

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
jethrofloyd
4 hours ago, psyche101 said:

Ive spotted a Thylacine.

Here's the proof.

images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQ7cgnVkg7pz5WOq4Orbo_

It's Melonylacine!

  • Like 1
  • Haha 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
jethrofloyd

To bad he didn't captured a photo of bigfoot family! :whistle:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Twin

These are excellent photos, compared to most bigfoot photos I've seen.

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
godnodog

yeah most likely bs attention seeker. 

"oh photos to be released"....oh for fokésáke whats the old up? Even an old school scanner can get things done within minutes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Resume

April 1 would have been a better date.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
HandsomeGorilla

Whenever you hear that footage/pictures will be released on a certain date, the Law of the Universe dictates the following, they will either be:

1) non existent

2) hilariously awful 

No option 3

Though the bloke in the video was charming, in his own way

Edited by HandsomeGorilla
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Jon the frog
15 hours ago, Carnoferox said:

Nick Mooney of the Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery has confirmed that the photos are pademelons and not thylacines. Who could’ve guessed that Neil would make the same mistake again? :lol:

 

How can you take a pademelon for a thylacine is the biggest mystery I have seen in 2021 !

Mountain Peak Photography — Tasmanian Pademelon

Edited by Jon the frog
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
tortugabob

It would be wonderful if this species was still there. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
openozy

I think old matey needs to get his beer goggles off.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.