Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -
Manwon Lender

After Times Exposé, Trump Justifies Charging Donors Under Fine Print Email Scheme

Recommended Posts

Manwon Lender

Donald Trump said our fundraising efforts, working together with the Republican party, were all done legally, and all with the goal of ensuring that my Administration could continue to Make America Great Again. The Election on the other hand, was massively rigged and stolen—and now look what it happening to our Country.” Instead of denying the allegations, Trump claimed: “This was done by Dems also.”

But the Times found that the fraud complaints were not evenly bipartisan. President Joe Biden’s campaign reported $21 million in refunds last year, a fraction of what the Trump campaign had to pay back. The bank officials reported a “negligible” number of fraud complaints, as opposed to the “rash” of ones that “inundated” the Trump campaign. ActBlue, while the Trump Campaign had  to refund 64.3 Million.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/after-times-exposé-trump-justifies-charging-donors-under-fine-print-email-scheme/ar-BB1fkqMc

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
Buzz_Light_Year

NYT lol.

https://thefederalist.com/2021/03/22/project-veritas-wins-early-round-in-defamation-lawsuit-against-new-york-times/

Quote

 

A New York judge slammed The New York Times for blurring the lines between news and opinion. The paper had attempted to get a defamation lawsuit against it dismissed on the grounds that, among other things, its reporters were just expressing their personal opinions when they disparaged the investigative journalists at Project Veritas.

The judge ruled the lawsuit can go forward, finding that Project Veritas showed sufficient evidence that The New York Times may have been motivated by “actual malice” and acted with “reckless disregard” when it ran several articles against the investigative journalism outfit.

 

Yeah this has nothing to do with your article on Trump but it does beg the question about the reliability and credibility of your source.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Manwon Lender
Posted (edited)
31 minutes ago, Buzz_Light_Year said:

NYT lol.

https://thefederalist.com/2021/03/22/project-veritas-wins-early-round-in-defamation-lawsuit-against-new-york-times/

Yeah this has nothing to do with your article on Trump but it does beg the question about the reliability and credibility of your source.

The original  source came from Law & Crime Magazine, this where the Times got the information from so I think the source is good. https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/trump-donors-fume-over-fine-print-which-allowed-campaign-to-charge-their-accounts-over-and-over/

Thanks

But your source above isn't good all, you may want to check that out.

The Federalist Questionable and far-Right Biased based on story selection and editorial positions that always favor the right and promotion of propaganda, conspiracy theories, and numerous failed fact checks.

Detailed Report

Questionable Reasoning: Conspiracy Theories, Propaganda, Failed Fact Checks
Bias Rating: RIGHT

Factual Reporting: MIXED
Country: USA (45/180 Press Freedom)
Media Type: Website
Traffic/Popularity: High Traffic
MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY

Edited by Manwon Lender
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Buzz_Light_Year

mediabiasfactcheck has already been outed for their lack of integrity so there's that. Furthermore the judges ruling in the Veritas lawsuit is a fact which can be found for anyone with enough integrity to pursue the information.

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Autochthon1990
On 4/6/2021 at 5:34 AM, Buzz_Light_Year said:

NYT lol.

https://thefederalist.com/2021/03/22/project-veritas-wins-early-round-in-defamation-lawsuit-against-new-york-times/

Yeah this has nothing to do with your article on Trump but it does beg the question about the reliability and credibility of your source.

Project Veritas? Really? Got anything more credible? Maybe that bat boy magazine? He's pretty good at undercover journalism, I think he was the president's lawyer for a while.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Manwon Lender
On 4/6/2021 at 10:26 PM, Buzz_Light_Year said:

mediabiasfactcheck has already been outed for their lack of integrity so there's that. Furthermore the judges ruling in the Veritas lawsuit is a fact which can be found for anyone with enough integrity to pursue the information.

 

 

 

Please back it up, comments like that are just opinions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.