Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -
Eldorado

Prince Charles not wanted as King

Recommended Posts

Eldorado
Posted (edited)

Young Brits want Prince Harry to be the next monarch of the United Kingdom after the Queen, a new poll suggests.

A survey conducted between March 31 and April 1 by Deltapoll included 1,590 respondents representative of the adult British population.

This survey found that a higher proportion of younger British wanted Prince Harry, the Duke of Sussex, to succeed Queen Elizabeth over his father Charles, Prince of Wales, and older brother Prince William, Duke of Cambridge.

The respondents included three demographic groups: Members of Generation Z, aged between 18 to 24, millennials aged between 24 and 40, and baby boomers aged between 57 and 75.

Full monty at Monsters & Critics

UK Independent at MSN

Yahoo

(Overall numbers suggested that British people want William over Charles; 47% versus 27%)

Edited by Eldorado
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
ouija ouija

Or . . . . . . when Liz pops her clogs, that would be the perfect time to abolish the monarchy altogether . . . . forever. :)

  • Like 7

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Luiza22
Posted (edited)

The somewhat  cerebrally limited  Harry is the Royal b******( prudishly not allowing the well known fact that he is illegitimate ) and  even on  his own private admission . He  is the spitting image of his biological Daddy . DYOR .

There is therefore as much chance of Harry been allowed even sight of the throne than there is of Sleepy still being your President by July 4 of this year . Exactly . Zero .

Edited by Luiza22
Typo
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Manwon Lender
8 minutes ago, Luiza22 said:

The somewhat  cerebrally limited  Harry is the Royal b******( prudishly not allowing the well known fact that he is illegitimate ) and  even on  his own private admission . He  is the spitting image of his biological Daddy . DYOR .

There is therefore as much chance of Harry been allowed even sight of the throne than there is of Sleepy still being your President by July 4 of this year . Exactly . Zero .

You know you comments are really terrible, unfounded, and totally false. Why do you say such disrespectful things and spread misinformation along with Conspiracy Theories that have been completely proven false? 

The News of the World even had strands of Harry’s hair DNA-tested in February 2003," Juror wrote. "And if Harry had been shown to be James Hewitt’s son, you can be sure we’d have known.

https://www.cosmopolitan.com/entertainment/celebs/a19586455/prince-harry-real-dad-james-hewitt-rumors/

 

 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Luiza22
4 minutes ago, Manwon Lender said:

You know you comments are really terrible, unfounded, and totally false. Why do you say such disrespectful things and spread misinformation along with Conspiracy Theories that have been completely proven false? 

The News of the World even had strands of Harry’s hair DNA-tested in February 2003," Juror wrote. "And if Harry had been shown to be James Hewitt’s son, you can be sure we’d have known.

 

4 minutes ago, Manwon Lender said:

You are a card .

Do you really imagine for a nano second that the Establishment would allow the truth? You probably also  believe that Harry's Mum is dead and killed in a tragic accident , rofl .

As for quoting the News of the World as a source -- on a par with suggesting that CIA puppet outfits like CNN or Wa Po even want to  spell such a word .

 

 

 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Eldorado
Posted (edited)

Line of succession

1. Charles, the Prince of Wales
2. Prince William, Duke of Cambridge
3. Prince George of Cambridge
4. Princess Charlotte of Cambridge
5. Prince Louis of Cambridge
6. Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex

Harry will go even further down the line when Prince William's children have kids of their own.

Royal Family Tree

Edited by Eldorado
  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Golden Duck
Posted (edited)
8 hours ago, Eldorado said:

Line of succession

1. Charles, the Prince of Wales
2. Prince William, Duke of Cambridge
3. Prince George of Cambridge
4. Princess Charlotte of Cambridge
5. Prince Louis of Cambridge
6. Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex

Harry will go even further down the line when Prince William's children have kids of their own.

Royal Family Tree

How come Charlotte is in front if Louis while Edward is in front of Anne?

Edited by Golden Duck
  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Eldorado
1 minute ago, Golden Duck said:

How come Charlotte is in front if Louis while Edward is in front of Anne?

The Succession to the Crown Act (2013) amended the provisions of the Bill of Rights and the Act of Settlement to end the system of male primogeniture, under which a younger son can displace an elder daughter in the line of succession. The Act applies to those born after 28 October 2011. The Act also ended the provisions by which those who marry Roman Catholics are disqualified from the line of succession. The changes came into force in all sixteen Realms in March 2015.

https://www.royal.uk/succession

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
TigerBright19
Posted (edited)

I think if William does become the next King then he will scope down all of the grand royal traditions of the past and live a more humble lifestyle similar to European royalty and that Windsor Castle and Buckingham Palace would become public museums and no longer places of royal residence.  We may look back at the Queen's reign and remember with fond memories the grandeur, pomp and ceremony of seeing the big Royal weddings on the Mall, and Trooping the Colour.  Hard to imagine that it will still be a tradition kept in the distant future.  I guess it depends on what future generations will want and if they regard us as old dinosaurs clinging to the past with nostalgia for the days we had a Royal Queen.

 

 

Edited by TigerBright19
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Luiza22
14 hours ago, Golden Duck said:

How come Charlotte is in front if Louis while Edward is in front of Anne?

From what we hear 'unofficially ',  many of them adopt very many unusual and queer positions . 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sir Wearer of Hats
On 4/10/2021 at 8:04 AM, TigerBright19 said:

I think if William does become the next King then he will scope down all of the grand royal traditions of the past and live a more humble lifestyle similar to European royalty and that Windsor Castle and Buckingham Palace would become public museums and no longer places of royal residence.  We may look back at the Queen's reign and remember with fond memories the grandeur, pomp and ceremony of seeing the big Royal weddings on the Mall, and Trooping the Colour.  Hard to imagine that it will still be a tradition kept in the distant future.  I guess it depends on what future generations will want and if they regard us as old dinosaurs clinging to the past with nostalgia for the days we had a Royal Queen.

You’re having a laugh, no one raised to expect the throne would ever give up a single benefit of that willingly (Even King Edward it is rumoured only abdicated because the very scary people who work for the Ministry of Intelligence suggested that he’d live longer that way. You couldn’t have an actual Nazi Supporter on the Throne). 
Trooping of the Colours is a massive tourist hit, and if “they attract tourists” is the only rationale people can come up with to justify their existence, the Trooping will obviously stay.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Setton
4 hours ago, Sir Wearer of Hats said:

You’re having a laugh, no one raised to expect the throne would ever give up a single benefit of that willingly (Even King Edward it is rumoured only abdicated because the very scary people who work work for the Ministry of Intelligence suggested that he’d live longer that way.

That... seems unlikely.

Not least because the UK has never had a 'Ministry of Intelligence'.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 
Grey Area
17 minutes ago, Setton said:

That... seems unlikely.

Not least because the UK has never had a 'Ministry of Intelligence'.

Or so they would have you believe.  No one had heard of the Kingsmen until the 2014 documentary about them.

  • Haha 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Cookie Monster

The far left speak for only themselves.

The UK Monarchy is quite popular.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sir Wearer of Hats
Posted (edited)
39 minutes ago, Setton said:

That... seems unlikely.

Not least because the UK has never had a 'Ministry of Intelligence'.

What does the I stand for in MI5 etc? I thought that was “Intelligence”.

 

 

ETA: it does stand for Intelligence, but the M stands for Military, not Ministry.

Edited by Sir Wearer of Hats

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.