Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -
UM-Bot

Yowie hunters capture new thermal footage

83 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

the13bats

:hmm:

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
jethrofloyd
Posted (edited)

I wonder why kangaroos are not 'termal' or 'blurry' creatures?

Edited by jethrofloyd
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Myles

We finally have it!!    Definitive proof of the beast among us. 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hammerclaw
Posted (edited)

*y.a.w.n."

Edited by Hammerclaw

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Jon the frog

nah it's a drop bear for sure !

image.jpeg.d33e9d7767562f297e94e07674d516cd.jpeg

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
moonman

Good thing bigfoots are the only thing in nature that can appear as warm lumps on thermal cams. So definitive!

  • Thanks 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Jaded1

You've got to love the Australians - "I think that's a load of b*****ks!" :lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Robotic Jew

ugh...really?

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Nobu

Video, eye witness……. Seems legit

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Night Walker

A couple of years ago I started a thread about bridging the skeptic-believer divide in the Yowie community. Well, update: I failed and this thermal video is the result…

It is disappointing seeing the number of Yowie researchers coming forward to congratulate the Yowie Hunter for this footage without the slightest bit of skepticism nor scrutiny. I tried but I was always on the outside looking in. If anyone had any lingering doubts about the integrity of Yowie research then surely this latest episode dispels it…

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Earl.Of.Trumps

Didn't we just have this in some other thread - only they showed the entire video. The only time it got interesting is when they did reverse imaging, or looking at a negative. 

Maybe it was another forum. Oh, well. memory lapses.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sir Wearer of Hats

Umm... there is no size context to that image, it could be bloody anything.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
jmccr8
15 hours ago, Sir Wearer of Hats said:

Umm... there is no size context to that image, it could be bloody anything.

I know it looks like my thumb but I can assure you my thumb hasn't left the country in years

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Night Walker

260893437_yowiethermalayrcomparisonmay202103.jpg.905a68016957958ed1f47a91dc88d118.jpg

  • Haha 1
  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
the13bats

NW,

You never showed me your proof that walas made that costume of those BF pics you posted year or so back, in other words its just your story he made the costume.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sir Wearer of Hats
3 hours ago, Night Walker said:

260893437_yowiethermalayrcomparisonmay202103.jpg.905a68016957958ed1f47a91dc88d118.jpg

Okay, that’s a better photo. 
What evidnce is there that there wasn’t five sods in the bush?

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
diddyman68
On 5/30/2021 at 2:09 AM, Earl.Of.Trumps said:

Didn't we just have this in some other thread - only they showed the entire video. The only time it got interesting is when they did reverse imaging, or looking at a negative. 

Maybe it was another forum. Oh, well. memory lapses.

Yeh,i saw the other clip on this forum.

Couldn't make much out on thermal,but the other filter showed it much clearer,and was interesting.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
the13bats

What would be staggeting interesting is if yowie was supported by any evidence there is far less to support it exists than there is for bigfoot which only has weak stories and unknown tracks.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Night Walker
8 hours ago, the13bats said:

NW,

You never showed me your proof that walas made that costume of those BF pics you posted year or so back, in other words its just your story he made the costume.

Ah... Well, I guess you are correct.

You've been waiting sever years to win a point of contention? Both impressive and bemusing...

  • Haha 2
  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
papageorge1

This makes me think of an even odder case I saw on a recent Bigfoot search show. They captured a thermal image of a large creature at a position where their naked eyes saw nothing. Argument (not proof; simmer down skeptics) for the theory that Bigfoot has interdimensional abilities that allow it to disappear from our three dimensional physical-only seeing eyes.

  • Like 3
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Trelane
1 hour ago, papageorge1 said:

This makes me think of an even odder case I saw on a recent Bigfoot search show. They captured a thermal image of a large creature at a position where their naked eyes saw nothing. Argument (not proof; simmer down skeptics) for the theory that Bigfoot has interdimensional abilities that allow it to disappear from our three dimensional physical-only seeing eyes.

Interdimensional:

NOUN

interdimensional (plural interdimensionals)

  1. (science fiction) A hypothetical being that can move between dimensions

*Note the use as Science Fiction.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
papageorge1
Posted (edited)
13 minutes ago, Trelane said:

Interdimensional:

NOUN

interdimensional (plural interdimensionals)

  1. (science fiction) A hypothetical being that can move between dimensions

*Note the use as Science Fiction.

Oh Please spare us :rolleyes:

Edited by papageorge1
  • Haha 1
  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Resume
2 hours ago, papageorge1 said:

This makes me think of an even odder case I saw on a recent Bigfoot search show. They captured a thermal image of a large creature at a position where their naked eyes saw nothing. Argument (not proof; simmer down skeptics) for the theory that Bigfoot has interdimensional abilities that allow it to disappear from our three dimensional physical-only seeing eyes.

Another argument would be that the show's presenters were telling fibs.  You know, for ratings.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
papageorge1
1 minute ago, Resume said:

Another argument would be that the show's presenters were telling fibs.  You know, for ratings.

Of course we all consider that. All things considered I find that highly unlikely in this case. This team prides themselves as scientists and just seemed legitimately baffled. Anyway after enough weird Bigfoot stories the ALWAYS fibbing becomes almost impossible.

 

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.