Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -

Outrage grows as Justice seeks to contain subpoena fallout


Vorg

Recommended Posts

Attorney General Merrick Garland is scrambling to contain the fallout of a widening Justice Department scandal as Democratic allies and the press express outrage over revelations that his agency secretly obtained records of lawmakers, reporters and dozens of others as it carried out aggressive leak investigations during the Trump presidency.
 
"What I think we are seeing is that it was worse than all of us even imagined. We knew the Department of Justice had become, in a sense, the personal arm of the Donald Trump protection racket," Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Mark Warner (D-Va.) said Monday during a Washington Post Live event. "These stories sound Nixonian but they are actually worse than Nixonian.
 

image.png

Edited by South Alabam
  • Like 4
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
28 minutes ago, South Alabam said:

He weaponized the Justice Department to go after his political enemies, and his followers will be O.K with this I suppose, but not with how Obama weaponized the IRS?

That's because leaking classified information is against the law and is a breach of security.  No politician is allowed by themselves to decide which classified information you may anonymously give to the NYT.  Non thread.  Manufactured outrage with story completely out of context with facts.

Edited by OverSword
  • Like 5
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Tatetopa said:

The DOJ was able to access phone records for entire families.   That is a whole lot more power and a deeper investigation than media can do.  

Oh I wouldn't be so sure about that part

ea5ab2d5392ff8d6c0f02e610beecda4.jpg

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, OverSword said:

That's because leaking classified information is against the law and is a breach of security.  No politician is allowed by themselves to decide which classified information you may anonymously give to the NYT.  Non thread.  Manufactured outrage with story completely out of context with facts.

The perpetually outraged crowd in the Democrat party has lost any sense of fairness or "equal justice under law".  They seem to literally believe that it's only a crime when their opponents break the law.  Pathetic, actually.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I must say I find this amusing.  It means stuff that we were told was "Fake News" or lies by a disgruntled employee were in fact true for a subpoena to be issued to try and catch them.  It also means that even after weaponizing the Justice Department, Trump couldn't dig up any dirt on the Democrats or the reporters that could be used against them.

The down side is that it pretty much sets the precedent that the President and the DOJ can issue subpoenas to spy on whoever.  I mean Trump, Gaetz, McConnel and the like would all be fair game unless we stop and punish the people who did it this time around. 

I do have to say I find this attitude amusing as well:

13 minutes ago, and then said:

The perpetually outraged crowd in the Democrat party has lost any sense of fairness or "equal justice under law".  They seem to literally believe that it's only a crime when their opponents break the law.  Pathetic, actually.

 A crime is a crime after all.  If one political party overlooks it when it happens and another doesn't then it's pretty obvious which party is aiding and abetting crime and which one is prosecuting it.  

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, aztek said:

so what , feds and media are personal arms of liberals, as bad as trump is, the other side is much worse

We have similar complaints in the UK:

The Main-stream Media is always saying the Johnson government is corrupt and breaks the law!

Judges and courts are always saying the Johnson government is corrupt and breaks the law!

Independent lawyers are always saying the Johnson government is corrupt and breaks the law!

International law agencies are always saying the Johnson government is corrupt and breaks the law!

We need to shut down the media, curtail the power of courts and lawyers, and let the government decide what is legal or not!

The only news channels that should be allowed should be GBNews and Breibart!

Then everyone will hear what we want them to hear!

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, ted hughes said:

We need to shut down the media, curtail the power of courts and lawyers, and let the government decide what is legal or not based on the laws of God as written in the Bible!

:yes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, and then said:

The perpetually outraged crowd in the Democrat party has lost any sense of fairness or "equal justice under law".  They seem to literally believe that it's only a crime when their opponents break the law.  Pathetic, actually.

Irony GIFs - Get the best GIF on GIPHY

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, aztek said:

so what , feds and media are personal arms of liberals, as bad as trump is, the other side is much worse

That doesn't make either side right. It just shows how out of control the American people are with a "Government by the people, for the people."

They keep electing the same old same olds over and over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
14 hours ago, OverSword said:

That's because leaking classified information is against the law and is a breach of security.  No politician is allowed by themselves to decide which classified information you may anonymously give to the NYT.  Non thread.  Manufactured outrage with story completely out of context with facts.

But it is being reported in other articles it was done illegally. Even unconstitutionally. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At the end of the day, I'm back to how I felt about the USG before Trump got elected. I was hopeful for a new direction being taken in US politics beyond the same 2 sides pretending we have a democracy. I should have known better. Even though I voted for Trump the second time (I was in prison Obama's first and second terms for marijuana) I see now that TPTB needed to pretend there was so much friction with Trump to give people the sense change might happen. That possible change away from Fascism/MIC (Fascism: being governed by corporations) died with JFK unfortunately.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, South Alabam said:

That doesn't make either side right. It just shows how out of control the American people are with a "Government by the people, for the people."

They keep electing the same old same olds over and over.

you whole thread is about how bad trump is. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, aztek said:

so what , feds and media are personal arms of liberals, as bad as trump is, the other side is much worse

And you replied about how bad the other side is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, South Alabam said:

And you replied about how bad the other side is.

exactly, the difference is the other side is in power now, and you voted for them, and now you complain how bad they are,  LMOA,  trump is out of the picture for more than a year, yet you still hung on him.  

i know it is a defense mechanism, you have to do it otherwise, you have to admit what a mess you put this country into by voting for  senile moron, and Marxist socialists,  so keep posting how bad trump is, lol

Edited by aztek
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, OverSword said:

Oh I wouldn't be so sure about that part

Maybe.  Money is the universal solvent after all.  But if you are a journalist, you might not have enough money to bribe a hacker of Apple technician and if you cross the DOJ and get caught, bad juju.  If you are Rupert Murdoch, you got the money and live in another country, you could do it with chump change.  But again, if you get caught, the financial cost may be more than the story was worth.    Doesn't mean  it couldn't happen though, just that there is a risk in it that a good reporter examining public records and  following the money doesn't face. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

People need to keep in mind that a leak and a whistle blower are not the same thing.  There is nothing to be outraged about for investigating the source of a leak. Currently they are investigating if the investigation went past legal boundaries  and the truth is we have no idea if it did or not.  We do know that part of the outrage was the request for metadata of a couple of Democrats from apple by the DOJ.  We also know that Apple does not simply hand over anything to the government ever.  If they did you can bet there was a warrant for that information.  Time will tell.

Edited by OverSword
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, aztek said:

exactly, the difference is the other side is in power now, and you voted for them, and now you complain how bad they are,  LMOA,  trump is out of the picture for more than a year, yet you still hung on him.  

i know it is a defense mechanism, you have to do it otherwise, you have to admit what a mess you put this country into by voting for  senile moron, and Marxist socialists,  so keep posting how bad trump is, lol

I didn't vote for them. I just despise Trump as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.