+Nuclear Wessel Posted October 18, 2021 #501 Share Posted October 18, 2021 6 minutes ago, third_eye said: So your incessant claim to having speed reading skills is also another or just one more of your multitude of lies... ~ Pretty sure one of our members tried to test that claim of his one time (I think it was @Liquid Gardens) and he respectfully declined. Who knows why? 1 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+Liquid Gardens Posted October 18, 2021 #502 Share Posted October 18, 2021 2 hours ago, Nuclear Wessel said: Pretty sure one of our members tried to test that claim of his one time (I think it was @Liquid Gardens) and he respectfully declined. Ha, mine was actually a test of his astral travelling to address his misbelief that he is travelling anywhere outside of his head. He declined to astral travel to my work office and tell me a three-letter word I was going to write nice and large for him on our whiteboard. 4 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+Nuclear Wessel Posted October 18, 2021 #503 Share Posted October 18, 2021 (edited) 1 minute ago, Liquid Gardens said: Ha, mine was actually a test of his astral travelling to address his misbelief that he is travelling anywhere outside of his head. He declined to astral travel to my work office and tell me a three-letter word I was going to write nice and large for him on our whiteboard. My mistake. Maybe his astral vehicle needed repairs that day? Edited October 18, 2021 by Nuclear Wessel 1 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lightly Posted October 18, 2021 #504 Share Posted October 18, 2021 I don't think we need language to be 'fully human" .. If you don't believe that, ask any baby. ...not a BIG point I guess, . .all these pages and that's what I come up with ? ! 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Walker Posted October 18, 2021 #505 Share Posted October 18, 2021 15 hours ago, eight bits said: You fail to show that human language is required for abstract and conceptual thinking. At best, you offer a fallacious argument from ignorance, thet you personally can't understand how such thinking could occur without human language. Who cares what you personally can't understand? Since that is supposedly your "argument" (as opposed to the preaching of religious dogma that it so obviously is), and you're not going to back it up, then we need to move on. No I use modern knowledge to explain tha t abstract and conceptual thinking (by their very nature) require "language" The y can't exist without it. Further I offered evidences that no non human animals demonstrate behaviours which result from abstract and conceptual/symbolic thinking Third i argue tha t there is no other evidence FOR that ability in other animals I agree tha t, without getting inside an animals mind it i hard to be absolute BUTr we CAN get inside human minds and we can do similar scans on other animal brain activity. While there are some similarities there are also huge differences indicating that non human animals don't think like humans can The problem is that most humans use their own self awareness to assume and judge how much non human animals have. That is misleading We have the capacity for cognitive (not behavioural) empathy and cognitive (not biological) love Non humans do not, thus we can feel for other animals in ways the y simply cannot feel for us we canfeel a form of grief love empathy for our animal partners which the y cannot feel for us eg we KNOW the y are going to die and tha t we will suffer loss, long before they do . Lastly, it intrigues me why some people have such an investment in believing that non human animals are like us in their mental capacity. If that was true, we could not eat them, kill them, harm them, or use them as unpaid labour. They would have the same rights as all self aware beings, for the same reasons that humans have those rights. 'And if any animal or artificial intelligence ever demonstrates human level self awareness I will be a strong advocate for giving it those rights. and I dont even know what religious dogma you have in your mind I formulated my opinion on animal cognition as an adolescent from reading, and at uni from my studies in cognition and language. I was an atheist and humanist at the time I haven't altered my opinion since then. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Walker Posted October 18, 2021 #506 Share Posted October 18, 2021 5 hours ago, lightly said: I don't think we need language to be 'fully human" .. If you don't believe that, ask any baby. ...not a BIG point I guess, . .all these pages and that's what I come up with ? ! Babies are not "fully human" Indeed, by law, unborn babies don't have any human rights in many jurisdictions. Young children don't have the rights (or responsibilities) of an adult IMO animals, as the y evolve self aware consciousness, will go through a legal stage where the y are treated like human infants and children, before reaching adult hood How does this tie back to the OP ? Simple. Only humans have the abilty to construct the concepts of heaven and hell, and only we have the abilty to choose which we live in, while we live here on earth. You can construct heaven as a state of mind or hell, while you are living. No other animal can do this. Other animals don't have the costs or benefits of belief. and don't have faiths or religions . Why? Simple. They don't have the cognitive capacity needed to construct and maintain those concepts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Walker Posted October 18, 2021 #507 Share Posted October 18, 2021 (edited) 12 hours ago, third_eye said: So your incessant claim to having speed reading skills is also another or just one more of your multitude of lies... ~ There is no connection between reading speed and typing skills I think very fast. i type as fast as I can, to get my thoughts down. Then I go back and draft the words i wrote I read at around 700 wpm , and think possibly 10 times faster than that. eg in my mind i can construct a narrative of around 7000 words in a minute (although that is hard to measure) i can only type about 40 wpm, and am entirely self taught Edited October 18, 2021 by Mr Walker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SHaYap Posted October 18, 2021 #508 Share Posted October 18, 2021 (edited) 18 minutes ago, Mr Walker said: There is no connection between reading speed and typing skills So you don't read what you write... ~ Quote I think very fast. You lie even quicker... ~ Quote i type as fast as I can, to get my thoughts down. Then I go back and draft the words i wrote That's not what you said the last time... Try again ~ Quote I read at around 700 wpm , and think possibly 10 times faster than that. You breathE at around 64 Bpm and lie 12 times per breath, quite possibly 100 times speedier than that. You win. ~ Quote i can only type about 40 wpm, and am entirely self taught Too bad for your lies, if only it were 40 million wpm or better yet 40 wps... Your lies would go by so fast no body would be able to bat at a vowel. ~ Edited October 19, 2021 by third_eye 'E' 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+Sherapy Posted October 19, 2021 #509 Share Posted October 19, 2021 (edited) 6 hours ago, lightly said: I don't think we need language to be 'fully human" .. If you don't believe that, ask any baby. ...not a BIG point I guess, . .all these pages and that's what I come up with ? ! It is an excellent point, I noted this too. Babies also aren’t self aware until 18 months old, either. And, we don’t need language to be fully human, try telling a family member that their loved one is not fully human now that they have Alzheimer’s a disease that wipes them out cognitively. Edited October 19, 2021 by Sherapy 5 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grim Reaper 6 Posted October 19, 2021 #510 Share Posted October 19, 2021 20 minutes ago, Sherapy said: It is an excellent point, I noted this too. Babies also aren’t self aware until 18 months old, either. And, we don’t need language to be fully human, try telling a family member that their loved one is not fully human now that they have Alzheimer’s a disease that wipes them out cognitively. Very well said, and thanks for sharing your thoughts you made a beautiful point that can't be denied! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+Nuclear Wessel Posted October 19, 2021 #511 Share Posted October 19, 2021 33 minutes ago, Mr Walker said: I read at around 700 wpm , and think possibly 10 times faster than that. eg in my mind i can construct a narrative of around 7000 words in a minute (although that is hard to measure) In the past you have said: Quote but I can easily read 1000 wpm (that is not even real speed reading its just fast reading ) Quote a bit over 600 wpm Quote it might drop as low as 500 wpm So you can read "easily" up to 1000 wpm, but it can "drop as low as 500 wpm". Interesting. Seems like you're all over the map with yourself. 1 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grim Reaper 6 Posted October 19, 2021 #512 Share Posted October 19, 2021 38 minutes ago, Mr Walker said: There is no connection between reading speed and typing skills I think very fast. i type as fast as I can, to get my thoughts down. Then I go back and draft the words i wrote I read at around 700 wpm , and think possibly 10 times faster than that. eg in my mind i can construct a narrative of around 7000 words in a minute (although that is hard to measure) i can only type about 40 wpm, and am entirely self taught What point are you trying to make, that you are special, that you are super human. Do you think that anyone believes what your saying about? I have a question, are you human or are you a Android? 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+Sherapy Posted October 19, 2021 #513 Share Posted October 19, 2021 2 minutes ago, Nuclear Wessel said: In the past you have said: So you can read "easily" up to 1000 wpm, but it can "drop as low as 500 wpm". Interesting. Seems like you're all over the map with yourself. 4 minutes ago, Nuclear Wessel said: In the past you have said: So you can read "easily" up to 1000 wpm, but it can "drop as low as 500 wpm". Interesting. Seems like you're all over the map with yourself. Typing 40 words a minute with his errors is truly nothing to brag about. Reading at his word count is low too, compared to the standards now. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jmccr8 Posted October 19, 2021 #514 Share Posted October 19, 2021 1 hour ago, Mr Walker said: I was an atheist and humanist at the time Hi Walker And yet you claim your god is an alien so really what kind of atheist are you? 2 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+joc Posted October 19, 2021 #515 Share Posted October 19, 2021 14 hours ago, Nuclear Wessel said: That being said, I think you're seriously missing the point. It has nothing to do with the inherent nature of the claim being made--whether the claim is actually true or not is irrelevant, but without evidence your truth claims may or may not be true, and in the absence of evidence I reserve the right to claim it as false until you, the initial claimant, provides evidence to substantiate the claim. Correctamundo! The claim could be anything from alien abduction to juggling bowling balls. Without evidence, all we have is belief. If you tell me you can juggle bowling balls, I won't believe you. But if you juggle bowling balls in front of me...that is evidence. I won't believe you can juggle bowling balls...because once you provide irrefutable evidence, we are no longer in the realm of belief, rather, we are in the realm of knowing. Once I see you juggle the bowling balls...I know you can do that. So, in the end, we only have two avenues...one is belief...the other knowing. Without evidence...it becomes a matter of belief. Evidence provides proof of knowing. Non-evidence provides an avenue of belief. Personally, I like to know things. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Walker Posted October 19, 2021 #516 Share Posted October 19, 2021 1 hour ago, jmccr8 said: Hi Walker And yet you claim your god is an alien so really what kind of atheist are you? Back then I was a person who didn't believe in the existence of "gods." Now I know that such beings exist Of course a god is alien (unless it happens to be human) "god" is just a name/ label which humans attach to a certain class of being. Humans have had thousands of gods Jehovah is an alien. Thor is an alien. Ra is an alien. Kali is an alien.(I think) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Walker Posted October 19, 2021 #517 Share Posted October 19, 2021 1 hour ago, Manwon Lender said: What point are you trying to make, that you are special, that you are super human. Do you think that anyone believes what your saying about? I have a question, are you human or are you a Android? No I am neither Those abilities are hard learned and won, from teaching by my parents and others as a child, and practice over life My brother is even faster in some of those areas All my family including my nieces and nephews read as much as I do and often as fast or faster Thus they have done very well at university, in courses ranging from nuclear biology through law and environmental science to an advanced degree in writing, film and literature , including a scholarship to a university in Canada I've known a couple of other teachers who were as fast /skilled. Anyone could do the same, with a bit of time and effort. I was responding to 3rd eyes poorly constructed link between speed reading and typing skills . If you don't believe me, then you don't accept what an ordinary human can do, given time, discipline, and effort. Unfortunately, this will also limit a person who doesn't believe the y can do these things. My parents raised me to try anything and to believe I could succeed a t almost anything On the other hand, I am tone deaf, and cant play a chord on any musical instrument, and admire the posters here who can. While I cant do it, I don't disbelieve their claims Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+Nuclear Wessel Posted October 19, 2021 #518 Share Posted October 19, 2021 7 minutes ago, Mr Walker said: Anyone could do the same, with a bit of time and effort. You mean learning skimming techniques and then passing it off as reading? Yeah, I have seen the same goofy claims that you’re touting, being made by companies trying to sell ridiculous speed reading products/courses. Get over yourself. 5 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Walker Posted October 19, 2021 #519 Share Posted October 19, 2021 15 hours ago, Nuclear Wessel said: This is just not true. You don't get to tell me what I can and cannot do when it comes to people making truth claims, thanks. If no evidence is provided to support the claim then I have no obligation to accept the claim as a possibility, nor do I have an obligation to accept it as true. I can claim the initial as false until proven otherwise as the burden of proof rests on the shoulders of the claimant, not on me. You love skirting along the edges of argumentum ad ignorantiam. I can remain unconvinced and assert your truth claim as false until you provide evidence otherwise. To be certain you are wrong could take an infinite amount of time, depending on the claims being made. That doesn't mean that I can't claim it as false, though. That being said, I think you're seriously missing the point. It has nothing to do with the inherent nature of the claim being made--whether the claim is actually true or not is irrelevant, but without evidence your truth claims may or may not be true, and in the absence of evidence I reserve the right to claim it as false until you, the initial claimant, provides evidence to substantiate the claim. Might be that chunky 180 IQ of yours not being able to understand my simpleton logic. And understanding the burden of proof seems to be something that you don't get. Perhaps you just don't understand the burden of proof. Perhaps you don't understand that I can make a negating counter-point in the absence of evidence to support the initial truth claim. There are no grounds on which I am required to accept your claim as true. Maybe you just don't like that because you're a controlling, manipulative person who is used to people accepting their claims as gospel, like an SDA pathfinder would? Who knows? You can't claim that you are factually correct without providing evidences for that claim. See what I did there? Then it's your opinion that you've read 30000 books. Good for you. I don't give a damn. I'm not you. I don't care about you or how you perceive things. To me, your claims are wide as an ocean and as deep as a puddle. Maybe you did read 30,000 books. To me, though, it's a false claim. I don't believe you. I am under no obligation to change my views, either. Tough luck. I can point out the rules of debate, logic and argument You are using one which was made up to justify disbelief in anything If you cant prove a claim false you may disbelieve it but cant claim tha t it s false. That requires proof, just as a truth claim does. You have no obligation to do anything including using logic or the rules of debate. Ok i accept your disbelief That is fair and logical . I accept your counter claim that my claim is false BUT until you can prove it false both claims have equal validity and strength .nk EXCEPT that there is little or no evidence for human level self awareness in non human animals, or an abilty to think in abstract conceptual terms, and considerable evidence that they cannot ,making my claim more likely to be correct Not my opinion that I've read 30000 books. That is knowldge Thats a minimum number over the last 65-70 years it is less than 500 books per year It is interesting how anti religious bias is evident from you and 8bits. In fact i was never a pathfinder and I haven't set foot in a chirch for about 30 years. I have no religious faith or beliefs. Dogmatic? Yes. That is my nature and part of why I was teacher for almost 45 years. Certain of self, strong in self esteem and ego? Yes. Indeed I believe that is essential for a happy healthy successful life Given that I have no religious beliefs or drivers, I wonder what other means you can use to justify your prejudices. Your disbelief doesn't hurt or affect me . However ,anyone who disbelieves a true claim, self limits their own knowledge and understanding of people and the world the y inhabit . Knowledge is power, and truth will set you free. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Walker Posted October 19, 2021 #520 Share Posted October 19, 2021 7 minutes ago, Nuclear Wessel said: You mean learning skimming techniques and then passing it off as reading? Yeah, I have seen the same goofy claims that you’re touting, being made by companies trying to sell ridiculous speed reading products/courses. Get over yourself. No. I also learned, and taught, skimming techniques, which is very different to true speed reading, and has a different purpose. The way it worked for me was that I looked a t a page for a second or two. I saw every word and punctuation mark on that page in one glance, and memorised it. Later, I could rewrite the page exactly, with the same words and punctuation. I used this technique in exams at uni., where i could recall every page of notes taken in lectures over the full year, (about 30-5000 words) if i read through them before an exam This was the extreme. More usually i could do this and have a 90% accurate recall. I've slowed down a bit as I've stopped needing the skill and got older, but last week I did an online test. This maxed out at 700 words in a minute. I completed 700 words in about 50 seconds In the test given afterwards, I got 80% recall/accuracy, which is about the same for most people reading at an average speed. I did 3 separate tests including JFK's inaugural address, and got similar speeds and results There are two techniques involved 1. Being able to see a whole page in the same way a beginning reader sees and identifies one word, then a sentence. Thus, reading page by page, not word by word. 2. The abilty to memorise that all, and recall it, like an actor learning their lines The eidetic memory will decay over time but if you transfer it to long term memory, you will remember the basics, 50 years later. I cant speak for companies seeking money. I taught myself back in the 60s, after reading how JFK learned to speed read and getting a scholarship to complete my high school education I'd been reading since age 3 and was always a fast reader (same for all my siblings and their own children ) Ps 700 words is my recreational reading speed. If i really concentrate, and give myself a headache, I can double that but this will reduce comprehension. eg one lunch time at school I sat down and read ,"T he English Patient "'cover to cover in 40 minutes. That's over 80000 words in 40 mins or 2000 words a minute I had a headache and a dry throat when I finished, but i could understand it all, and tell you about the characters, storyline etc. with as much accuracy as a person who took many hours to read it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Walker Posted October 19, 2021 #521 Share Posted October 19, 2021 2 hours ago, Sherapy said: It is an excellent point, I noted this too. Babies also aren’t self aware until 18 months old, either. And, we don’t need language to be fully human, try telling a family member that their loved one is not fully human now that they have Alzheimer’s a disease that wipes them out cognitively. Well the y are not, and thus they have certain rights and responsibilities removed from them, because they are no longer fully human. ie the y cant function as a normal adult human is expected to function. This is the logical/rational response not one based on emotion . Hence, of course, those of us who do possess full functionality have a responsibility to care for those of us who do not, including babies and the mentally infirm There are a number of animals who are similar in cognitive function to an infant We do, or at least should, treat them as we might a human infant, but they will never grow further in abilty, while a human child normally will Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SHaYap Posted October 19, 2021 #522 Share Posted October 19, 2021 48 minutes ago, Mr Walker said: I was responding to 3rd eyes poorly constructed link between speed reading and typing skills . Why do you lie so much? I pointed out that you said that you don't read what you type, which was what you said, which was also more lies nested among your many lies. ~ 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Freez1 Posted October 19, 2021 #523 Share Posted October 19, 2021 Here’s the down side of it in a nut shell. Don’t believe and it’s going to be real hot in you’re afterlife. Have a little faith and either way you can’t go wrong. Once you leave this life there is no backing up. We are here to live by a simple set of rules that betters humanity. Unfortunately not everyone thinks along the same line. So we have prisons to house some and the electric chair for others. And even these people can find their way into Heaven. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jmccr8 Posted October 19, 2021 #524 Share Posted October 19, 2021 1 hour ago, Mr Walker said: Back then I was a person who didn't believe in the existence of "gods." Now I know that such beings exist Of course a god is alien (unless it happens to be human) "god" is just a name/ label which humans attach to a certain class of being. Humans have had thousands of gods Jehovah is an alien. Thor is an alien. Ra is an alien. Kali is an alien.(I think) Hi Walker So either you are lying to yourself or us about being an atheist and in all the years of reading your posts you have yet to demonstrate that you are an atheist as you preach your belief in a god. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jmccr8 Posted October 19, 2021 #525 Share Posted October 19, 2021 1 hour ago, Mr Walker said: You have no obligation to do anything including using logic or the rules of debate. 1 hour ago, Mr Walker said: I have no religious faith or beliefs. 1 hour ago, Mr Walker said: Given that I have no religious beliefs or drivers, Hi Walker What logic have you applied as you have a god and claim to be an atheist? 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts