Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -

'Bigfoot' photographed in Bernard, Iowa


UM-Bot

Recommended Posts

On 7/30/2021 at 7:09 PM, Dejarma said:

more like BS claims  are becoming social media stars. but nothing new there= just look at one of the many ufo documentaries coming out regarding the so called tic-tac etc rubish ;)

How is the Tic-Tac video rubbish?  Is there no pleasing you at all?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Guyver said:

How is the Tic-Tac video rubbish?  Is there no pleasing you at all?

When someones starting point is extreme skeptic,even if a spacecraft landed in his garden ,took him for a fly around the galaxy then dropped him back home after a thorough probing.he would still put the whole experience and sore butt down to hallucinations caused by an extra spicy lamb vindaloo.:yes:

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Snoozer.

Where's the pics of the footprints? Doh. When I see a vid of a suspected beast do something like leap 20 feet, that a human can't do, that will get my attention.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, diddyman68 said:

When someones starting point is extreme skeptic,even if a spacecraft landed in his garden ,took him for a fly around the galaxy then dropped him back home after a thorough probing.he would still put the whole experience and sore butt down to hallucinations caused by an extra spicy lamb vindaloo.:yes:

if this happened I'd have no reason not to believe, would I.. I'd have proof. Butt (excuse the pun) if I were to post in here this 'absolutely true' story; no one would believe me. Some would- what happens then? An 'absolutely true' story or not= nothing will change! Will it ;)

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Dejarma said:

if this happened I'd have no reason not to believe, would I.. I'd have proof. Butt (excuse the pun) if I were to post in here this 'absolutely true' story; no one would believe me. Some would- what happens then? An 'absolutely true' story or not= nothing will change! Will it ;)

I mean, that is just such fatalism.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Guyver said:

I mean, that is just such fatalism.

No, it's demonstrating the weakness of personal anecdotes as evidence.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Dejarma said:

if this happened I'd have no reason not to believe, would I.. I'd have proof. Butt (excuse the pun) if I were to post in here this 'absolutely true' story; no one would believe me. Some would- what happens then? An 'absolutely true' story or not= nothing will change! Will it ;)

And if that happened,and you filmed the whole thing then posted it here,sceptics would still accuse you of faking the footage.so you're right,nothing would change.

No amount of evidence is good enough to be called proof for some.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, diddyman68 said:

And if that happened,and you filmed the whole thing then posted it here,sceptics would still accuse you of faking the footage.so you're right,nothing would change.

No amount of evidence is good enough to be called proof for some.

You don't undertstand skepticism.

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Resume said:

You don't undertstand skepticism.

Or comedy.

Harte

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, diddyman68 said:

And if that happened,and you filmed the whole thing then posted it here,sceptics would still accuse you of faking the footage.so you're right,nothing would change.

No amount of evidence is good enough to be called proof for some.

 

712FB6C0-FE91-4F12-A419-9A1EE5DF5660.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/2/2021 at 7:07 PM, Dejarma said:

if this happened I'd have no reason not to believe, would I.. I'd have proof. Butt (excuse the pun) if I were to post in here this 'absolutely true' story; no one would believe me. Some would- what happens then? An 'absolutely true' story or not= nothing will change! Will it ;)

Maybe, maybe not.   If you had video that wasn't blurry.   If you admitted that you went to where you seen it and gathered some fur to be sent for analysis.   Some would be very skeptical but others would wait for the results.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Myles said:

Some would be very skeptical but others would wait for the results.

no need for scepticism if you're a  rational thinker because they know bigfood does not exist IMO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Dejarma said:

no need for scepticism if you're a  rational thinker because they know bigfood does not exist IMO

Yeah, but many "skeptics"  still hold out a little hope.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Myles said:

Yeah, but many "skeptics"  still hold out a little hope.

hope that they are proved real? only to be captured / killed etc... i hope not

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Dejarma said:

hope that they are proved real? only to be captured / killed etc... i hope not

Yep.   Not sure about hoping they are captured and killed.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Myles said:

Yep.   Not sure about hoping they are captured and killed.  

You mean the "witness," or the "Bigfoot?"

Harte

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/4/2021 at 4:13 PM, Dejarma said:

hope that they are proved real? only to be captured / killed etc... i hope not

No worries then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So there is three pics. Are they all the same pic? If not, then why does bigfoot stand completely still? Even holding his head at the same angle for all pics.

Looks like a stump to me.

Edited by DieChecker
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, DieChecker said:

So there is three pics. Are they all the same pic? If not, then why does bigfoot stand completely still? Even holding his head at the same angle for all pics.

Looks like a stump to me.

1568652287863_img_2004.jpg

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/2/2021 at 7:04 PM, Resume said:

No, it's demonstrating the weakness of personal anecdotes as evidence.

Dude, I literally showed a 3D scan of a sasquatch footprint using the latest in modern science technology and you just laughed it off.  As if such a thing could be faked by a *******.  Seriously?  You dismiss science when it contradicts your beliefs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Guyver said:

Dude, I literally showed a 3D scan of a sasquatch footprint using the latest in modern science technology and you just laughed it off.  As if such a thing could be faked by a *******.  Seriously?  You dismiss science when it contradicts your beliefs.

Dude, you posted a photo of a scan of something someone claims is a sasquatch footprint.  You have no idea of what can be faked; you have no idea of what a footie footprint looks like; you've just made a great big fat argument from personal incredulity: "I don't know how it could be faked, so it must be real."

Want to prove footie exists, get a footie.  Or part of one.  

Again, care to make a bigfoot wager?  

Edited by Resume
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Resume said:

Dude, you posted a photo of a scan of something someone claims is a sasquatch footprint.  You have no idea of what can be faked; you have no idea of what a footie footprint looks like; you've just made a great big fat argument from personal incredulity: "I don't know how it could be faked, so it must be real."

Want to prove footie exists, get a footie.  Or part of one.  

Again, care to make a bigfoot wager?  

Any wager would have to have a date attached.   

Bigfoot will be found and documented in science journals by August 2022.

I used to hold out some hope for it being real.   Then about 20 years ago I thought to myself - With all the camera's and people out there, if it is not found in the next 10 years, I don't think it exists.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Myles said:

Any wager would have to have a date attached.   

Bigfoot will be found and documented in science journals by August 2022.

I used to hold out some hope for it being real.   Then about 20 years ago I thought to myself - With all the camera's and people out there, if it is not found in the next 10 years, I don't think it exists.

Well sure.  We'd have to agree to certain protocols, which would of course include a date. If Guyver "won," I'd contribute an agreed to amount to the charity of his choice; If I "won," all he'd have to do would be admit it doesn't look good for the existence of ole foo.

Edited by Resume
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/30/2021 at 9:07 AM, Myles said:

What?    An alleged bigfoot pitcher that is not clear.    That never happens.    

I assume that they did not go to the spot and get some fur.  They never do.

Bigfoot pitcher? Is there an expansion team I didn't know about?

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Photo in Blurvision--by Blamo!

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.