Eldorado Posted September 17, 2021 #1 Share Posted September 17, 2021 Prehistoric Japan underwent rapid transformations in the past 3000 years, first from foraging to wet rice farming and then to state formation. A long-standing hypothesis posits that mainland Japanese populations derive dual ancestry from indigenous Jomon hunter-gatherer-fishers and succeeding Yayoi farmers. However, the genomic impact of agricultural migration and subsequent sociocultural changes remains unclear. We report 12 ancient Japanese genomes from pre- and postfarming periods. Our analysis finds that the Jomon maintained a small effective population size of ~1000 over several millennia, with a deep divergence from continental populations dated to 20,000 to 15,000 years ago, a period that saw the insularization of Japan through rising sea levels. Rice cultivation was introduced by people with Northeast Asian ancestry. Unexpectedly, we identify a later influx of East Asian ancestry during the imperial Kofun period. These three ancestral components continue to characterize present-day populations, supporting a tripartite model of Japanese genomic origins. Science Advances 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Piney Posted September 17, 2021 #2 Share Posted September 17, 2021 6 minutes ago, Eldorado said: Unexpectedly, we identify a later influx of East Asian ancestry during the imperial Kofun period. These three ancestral components continue to characterize present-day populations, supporting a tripartite model of Japanese genomic origins. From the Korean Peninsula, a connection they tried to erase for nearly a century. 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tatetopa Posted September 18, 2021 #3 Share Posted September 18, 2021 In a Tokyo museum, I saw some artifacts that if I remember correctly were Jomon. Among everything else, there were some bead-like objects that were about the size and shape of a cashew nut. I suggested to my guide they looked a bit like animal claws and wondered if that was the inspiration for the shape. I was immediately told emphatically no. At the time I wondered why that would be so out of line for a hunting people, but let it drop. I can accept being wrong, but the idea seemed to really put the museum, guide off and I wondered why. Did I step over a cultural line and become rude? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now