Grim Reaper 6 Posted September 22, 2021 #1 Share Posted September 22, 2021 A senior US state department official told the AP that the committee "would take some time to deliberate," suggesting that the Taliban's representative might not be able to speak at this current session. When the Taliban previously ruled Afghanistan from 1996 to 2001, the hardline Islamist group was not given a seat at the UN, and instead recognized the former government that controlled the country before them. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/the-taliban-wants-to-speak-at-the-un-general-assembly-in-new-york-as-the-official-government-of-afghanistan/ar-AAOGzso 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aztek Posted September 22, 2021 #2 Share Posted September 22, 2021 what is next, association of child rapist will want to have a seat in UN???? not that UN would mind..... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spartan max2 Posted September 22, 2021 #3 Share Posted September 22, 2021 How about no 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+OverSword Posted September 22, 2021 #4 Share Posted September 22, 2021 (edited) I disagree. We all but handed the country to them so lets set up a system of perks to encourage them to govern well. Not necessarily give them full membership or allow them to address the assembly at this time, more like a seat at the kiddie table and perhaps let their representative join a committee. It could help to discourage them from cooperating with foreign terror groups at the very least. Edited September 22, 2021 by OverSword 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Myles Posted September 22, 2021 #5 Share Posted September 22, 2021 3 minutes ago, OverSword said: I disagree. We all but handed the country to them so lets set up a system of perks to encourage them to govern well. No necessarily give them full membership or allow them to address the assembly at this time, more like a seat at the kiddie table and perhaps let their representative join a committee. It could help to discourage them from cooperating with foreign terror groups at the very least. I like your thoughts process on this. Definitely one of those decisions that needs to use the list of positives and list of negatives trick. It would be recognizing the Taliban as the ruling government. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aztek Posted September 22, 2021 #6 Share Posted September 22, 2021 lol, you guys seriously think they will govern any differently than Islamic fanatics have been ruling Muslim countries for thousands of years???? lol next thing you'll believe elections are fair, lol 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+OverSword Posted September 22, 2021 #7 Share Posted September 22, 2021 (edited) 9 minutes ago, aztek said: lol, you guys seriously think they will govern any differently than Islamic fanatics have been ruling Muslim countries for thousands of years???? lol next thing you'll believe elections are fair, lol We already know that not everyone in Afghanistan is a muslim extremist. And you never know, the leader may end up being someone with enough of an ego that he cares a little bit that the international community recognizes him. One way ensure the taliban rule with an iron fist and religious zealotry is to isolate and alienate them. Edited September 22, 2021 by OverSword 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+OverSword Posted September 22, 2021 #8 Share Posted September 22, 2021 38 minutes ago, Myles said: It would be recognizing the Taliban as the ruling government. They are the ruling government. If we can keep them from allowing foreign terrorists to set up shop by trying to work with them a bit then what's the harm? We're not going to be able to reinstall the puppet that ran away from the country with a ton of money and let them take over. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aztek Posted September 22, 2021 #9 Share Posted September 22, 2021 (edited) 18 minutes ago, OverSword said: We already know that not everyone in Afghanistan is a muslim extremist. And you never know, the leader may end up being someone with enough of an ego that he cares a little bit that the international community recognizes him. One way ensure the taliban rule with an iron fist and religious zealotry is to isolate and alienate them. i'm sure some in A -stan are not, but Taliban IS. of course we know, we have seen it for over 100 years at least. they never care what international community think. what do you think Taliban wants to talk about in the UN? they will blame the west for invasion and trying to turn its people from their only right path, which is Islam, and the culture they lived in for 1000s of years Edited September 22, 2021 by aztek Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+OverSword Posted September 22, 2021 #10 Share Posted September 22, 2021 1 minute ago, aztek said: i'm sure some in A -stan are not, but Taliban IS. of course we know, we have seen it for over 100 years at least. they never care what international community think. The world is shrinking. I was watching a BBC interview with the president of Pakistan who says this is a slightly different and more mature taliban than ran things 20 years ago that understands the benefit or cooperating with a larger community. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buzz_Light_Year Posted September 22, 2021 #11 Share Posted September 22, 2021 Anything is possible, after all China is on the U.N. Human Rights Council. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+OverSword Posted September 22, 2021 #12 Share Posted September 22, 2021 8 minutes ago, Buzz_Light_Year said: Anything is possible, after all China is on the U.N. Human Rights Council. And a lot of middle eastern countries as well, which shows why it's not a big deal to talk with the taliban. The UN is basically meh. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SHaYap Posted September 22, 2021 #13 Share Posted September 22, 2021 They were given an agreement deal and they signed on the dotted line... Quote www.factcheck.org Timeline of US Withdrawal from Afghanistan 17 Aug 2021 — The Trump administration in February 2020 negotiated a withdrawal agreement with the Taliban that excluded the Afghan government, ... www.statesman.com Mitt Romney is right. Trump negotiated for Taliban prisoner ... 1 Sep 2021 — A Feb. 29, 2020, agreement between the United States and the Taliban said that the U.S. and its allies would withdraw their military forces ... ~ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vorg Posted September 22, 2021 #14 Share Posted September 22, 2021 7 hours ago, Manwon Lender said: A senior US state department official told the AP that the committee "would take some time to deliberate," suggesting that the Taliban's representative might not be able to speak at this current session. When the Taliban previously ruled Afghanistan from 1996 to 2001, the hardline Islamist group was not given a seat at the UN, and instead recognized the former government that controlled the country before them. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/the-taliban-wants-to-speak-at-the-un-general-assembly-in-new-york-as-the-official-government-of-afghanistan/ar-AAOGzso But we are kinder and gentler beheaders now. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grim Reaper 6 Posted September 22, 2021 Author #15 Share Posted September 22, 2021 2 hours ago, South Alabam said: But we are kinder and gentler beheaders now. They were not given a seat at the UN in the past, it isn't going to happen now. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now