Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -
Sign in to follow this  
OverSword

New group of GOP lawmakers file articles of impeachment against Biden

73 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

OverSword
Quote

 

A group of four GOP lawmakers on Tuesday filed articles of impeachment against President Biden, saying he should be removed from office for not securing the border, for the way U.S. troops were removed from Afghanistan and for seeking to impose a ban on evictions even when he said it might not pass constitutional muster.

Ohio Rep. Bob Gibbs (R) is leading the effort, and is joined by fellow GOP Reps. Andy Biggs (Ariz.), Brian Babin (Texas) and Randy Weber (Texas). 

This is the second time articles of impeachment have been introduced pertaining to Biden. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) filed articles of impeachment the day after Biden was sworn into office.

Neither effort will go far in a House where Democrats hold a slim majority, but the latest effort shows how the introduction of articles of impeachment is becoming more common in today's polarized House. 

Former President Trump was impeached twice during his four-year presidency, but was not convicted either time by the Senate. 

Republicans are hoping to win back the House majority in next year's midterms, however, and GOP leaders could face pressure in such a scenario to move impeachment articles backed by some of their most conservative members. 

 

Link

  • Like 3
  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Doug1066
6 minutes ago, OverSword said:

More Bull Durham

Doug

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Myles

Surprised it took this long.  

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
OverSword

Keep in mind though, that if he were impeached the VP would take his place........

  • Haha 1
  • Sad 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Buzz_Light_Year
10 minutes ago, OverSword said:

Keep in mind though, that if he were impeached the VP would take his place........

I always thought that would be enough incentive to not bring impeachment articles against Biden.

 

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
OverSword
3 minutes ago, Buzz_Light_Year said:

I always thought that would be enough incentive to not bring impeachment articles against Biden.

 

Maybe they think having Harris in office would guarantee two terms for the next republican president?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Robotic Jew
11 minutes ago, OverSword said:

Keep in mind though, that if he were impeached the VP would take his place........

Nothing to worry about. They've probably already have articles of impeachment written up for her as well.

They'll impeach for being a woman, not protecting the former VP when he was attacked by the fly at the debate, and lastly for having the nerve to wear pants. 

  • Haha 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
itsnotoutthere
17 minutes ago, OverSword said:

Keep in mind though, that if he were impeached the VP would take his place........

Giggler!! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
OverSword
Just now, Robotic Jew said:

Nothing to worry about. They've probably already have articles of impeachment written up for her as well.

They'll impeach for being a woman, not protecting the former VP when he was attacked by the fly at the debate, and lastly for having the nerve to wear pants. 

And then Pelosi is next in line. :passifier:

  • Like 1
  • Sad 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
aztek
54 minutes ago, OverSword said:

Keep in mind though, that if he were impeached the VP would take his place........

well our potus is a barely talking veggie, so he  is definitely not in charge,  the VP is an awol, she does nothing, she is a puppet too. so n o matter who is officially in charge things will not change, i see no point in the impeachment in this particular case, let the veggie stay, after him, anything will be better, lol same for pelosi, she does what she wants now, nothing will change,

they need to file for impeachment for all 3 of them, just for the hell of it.  nothing will come out anyway, and if something does, things will go the same route they go now

Edited by aztek
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Desertrat56
56 minutes ago, OverSword said:

Keep in mind though, that if he were impeached the VP would take his place........

Oh give it up.  What politician is better than any other at that level, or worse for that matter?   It doesn't matter because he is not going to be impeached, just like Trump wasn't impeached.  But a lot of time was wasted on attempts, though I don't think they were genuine since they didn't result in anything but wasted time and money and a lot of distracting media.   That is what is going on now.   You think the democratic party and the republican party are two separate entities, and they have seemed like that but there are indications that they move to a similar purpose and may be owned by the same people.    Keeping us divided over idiotic nonsense serves the purpose of the owners and the puppets do a great job of keeping us distracted.  

Now that I finished my diatribe, I want to know what you think would be worse if Kamala were president.  Is it because she is a woman?  because she has darker skin?  What??? 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Buzz_Light_Year
27 minutes ago, Desertrat56 said:

Now that I finished my diatribe, I want to know what you think would be worse if Kamala were president.  Is it because she is a woman?  because she has darker skin?  What??? 

Just a tanned version of Cankles Hillary. :st

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
aztek
37 minutes ago, Desertrat56 said:

 

Now that I finished my diatribe, I want to know what you think would be worse if Kamala were president.  Is it because she is a woman?  because she has darker skin?  What??? 

why would you think a woman with a dark skin would not be as good of a potus than any other race\gender? and why would you ask us if we thought it was the case? that reeks of racist instigation,  keep that racism alive, right? smh

Edited by aztek
  • Like 3
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Desertrat56
6 minutes ago, Buzz_Light_Year said:

Just a tanned version of Cankles Hillary. :st

You really do try too hard to get my attention answering questions I ask others.   Why?   

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Buzz_Light_Year
5 minutes ago, Desertrat56 said:

You really do try too hard to get my attention answering questions I ask others.   Why?   

Me thinks you think way too much. It's not about you nor ever will be.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Desertrat56
5 minutes ago, Buzz_Light_Year said:

Me thinks you think way too much. It's not about you nor ever will be.

No, It seems to be all about you.   

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
RavenHawk
1 hour ago, OverSword said:

Keep in mind though, that if he were impeached the VP would take his place........

Dan Quayle on steroids!

Edited by RavenHawk
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
OverSword
51 minutes ago, Desertrat56 said:

Now that I finished my diatribe, I want to know what you think would be worse if Kamala were president.  Is it because she is a woman?  because she has darker skin?  What??? 

I didn't say it would be worse, although it probably would.  I remember all the democrats throwing the word racist at anyone who disagreed with Obama about anything and if kamala were president they would no doubt yell misogynist.  What a victory for womankind that would be :rolleyes:  But you are correct, in fact neither of them is really a bigger POS than the other.

  • Like 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Doug1066
1 hour ago, OverSword said:

Keep in mind though, that if he were impeached the VP would take his place........

That's the universal strategy:  pick a VP that nobody wants to become President.  Then nobody will dare to kill you.

Doug

  • Haha 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Desertrat56
1 minute ago, OverSword said:

I didn't say it would be worse, although it probably would.  I remember all the democrats throwing the word racist at anyone who disagreed with Obama about anything and if kamala were president they would no doubt yell misogynist.  What a victory for womankind that would be :rolleyes:  But you are correct, in fact neither of them is really a bigger POS than the other.

The reason I asked, and what triggered my diatribe was the way you worded it indicating that you thought it would be worse than Biden.  At least neither Biden or Harris is carrying a bible in their pocket to beat people with like Pence seemed to have.  If Trump had to step down Pence would have been no better or worse.  That kind thinking needs to change because since Johnson and Nixon, nothing changes no matter who is president.   There was a big difference when Johnson took over for Kennedy and there was some difference when Ford took over for Nixon, but you won't see that any more.   The press will make sure we think there are differences but it is all divisive distraction.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
RavenHawk

Very unlikely that an impeachment will occur, but every Republican Law maker needs to file impeachment charges.  For one, to show unity.  And two, this will show that something is very wrong here.  I certainly hope for a typical midterm.  If nothing else gets done in the next Congress, the one thing will be they should go through each and every impeachment.  Just load the Senate with impeachment trials.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
OverSword
3 minutes ago, Desertrat56 said:

At least neither Biden or Harris is carrying a bible in their pocket to beat people with

Harris carries the social justice hypocrites bible.

  • Like 2
  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Michelle

If the "border czar" job is any indication I wouldn't hire Harris to wash dishes.

  • Like 4
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
RavenHawk
2 hours ago, Desertrat56 said:

Good lord, instead of doing what we elected them to do they will waste time and money on this,

We didn’t elect them to run this country into the ground.  Anything to distract them from that is worth it.

 

just like the last 4 years when things that needed to get done didn't because everyone was fixated on bullsh***t.  

Actually, the President got a lot done.  It would have been better if Congress had backed him.  The bullsh***t was exclusively a Socialist and Rino thing.  Although, at this point, I think we can pull away from using ‘Socialist’ in the general sense and start using ‘Marxist’ or even ‘Maoist’.  It is becoming clear as to what the Progressives want.

 

It is distraction and waste.  

For a free people and free nation, yes, it is.  But for the Maoists, the more chaos they can create the better.  But see, two can play at that game.

 

We should vote them all out when they are up for re-election,

I have no argument with that.

 

vote non Democrat, AND non-Republican.  Get some independents in there, even a couple of Libertarians would be better

That won’t change a thing, because there would still be two ideologies.  The dominate ideology needs to be in line with fiscal responsibility and protecting individual rights.  It’s not that we have two parties always in deadlock.  That is how it was designed.  Gridlock is the rule, then when both sides agree on something, it happens and for the betterment of our prosperity.

 

than what we have now to break the strangle hold those two parties have on our government!

Again, it is not about the parties.  At one time, the parties had different ideas on how to run the country, but both had the best interests of this nation at heart.  We don’t have that now.  One party is only interested in its best interests.  We have a third ideology that has infiltrated our system and has completely poisoned one party and working to take the other.  To fight that, we need to vote in Conservatives and then vote them out at the next cycle.  And keep that up, until the will of the people out last the will of corruption.  If politicians find out that it is not profitable in being elected, then they aren’t an easy target for lobbyists.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.