Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -

New group of GOP lawmakers file articles of impeachment against Biden


OverSword

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, RavenHawk said:

We didn’t elect them to run this country into the ground.  Anything to distract them from that is worth it.

 

 

Actually, the President got a lot done.  It would have been better if Congress had backed him.  The bullsh***t was exclusively a Socialist and Rino thing.  Although, at this point, I think we can pull away from using ‘Socialist’ in the general sense and start using ‘Marxist’ or even ‘Maoist’.  It is becoming clear as to what the Progressives want.

 

 

For a free people and free nation, yes, it is.  But for the Maoists, the more chaos they can create the better.  But see, two can play at that game.

 

 

I have no argument with that.

 

 

That won’t change a thing, because there would still be two ideologies.  The dominate ideology needs to be in line with fiscal responsibility and protecting individual rights.  It’s not that we have two parties always in deadlock.  That is how it was designed.  Gridlock is the rule, then when both sides agree on something, it happens and for the betterment of our prosperity.

 

 

Again, it is not about the parties.  At one time, the parties had different ideas on how to run the country, but both had the best interests of this nation at heart.  We don’t have that now.  One party is only interested in its best interests.  We have a third ideology that has infiltrated our system and has completely poisoned one party and working to take the other.  To fight that, we need to vote in Conservatives and then vote them out at the next cycle.  And keep that up, until the will of the people out last the will of corruption.  If politicians find out that it is not profitable in being elected, then they aren’t an easy target for lobbyists.

 

You are confused.  I said nothing about whether the president got anything done or not.  You make  no sense.  We elected congresspeople and senators to work for us, not take us down with their distracting useless partisan maneuvering.   You are so polarized you can't even understand what you read if it refers to what you think is a republican or democrat.   

And you constantly contradict yourself.  Of course it is not about the parties, I have been saying that for a long time.   The parties are really one designed to keep us at each other's throats so we won't notice the theft of our rights and our money.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, aztek said:

why would you think a woman with a dark skin would not be as good of a potus than any other race\gender? and why would you ask us if we thought it was the case? that reeks of racist instigation,  keep that racism alive, right? smh

It is what the left loves to do.   Create racism in everything.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Myles said:

It is what the left loves to do.   Create racism in everything.

Are you calling yourself a leftist?  You bring it up more than anyone else on this forum.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Desertrat56 said:

Are you calling yourself a leftist?  You bring it up more than anyone else on this forum.

Odd you would say this when it was YOU who brought it up in the thread.   

"Is it because she has dark skin".    

It's the left's go to move,  cry racism.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Myles said:

Odd you would say this when it was YOU who brought it up in the thread.   

"Is it because she has dark skin".    

It's the left's go to move,  cry racism.

I was responding to @OverSword's idiotic comment about Harris becoming president if Biden was impeached.   Context is key to understanding what people are saying.   And I was asking him personally what his problem with her was, I was not accusing anyone of anything like you constantly do.  And I don't know why anyone resonds to that sociopathic, flame baiter aztek.   

Edited by Desertrat56
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Desertrat56 said:

I was responding to @OverSword's idiotic comment about Harris becoming president if Biden was impeached.   Context is key to understanding what people are saying.   And I was asking him personally what his problem with her was, I was not accusing anyone of anything like you constantly do.  And I don't know why anyone resonds to that sociopathic, flame baiter aztek.   

Why would you go to race as the reason he doesn't want her to become president?   It's the go to move for you.    

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Myles said:

Why would you go to race as the reason he doesn't want her to become president?   It's the go to move for you.    

Notice I mentioned female first and I went to skin color as those were the only two reasons I could think of.  Can you think of other reasons?   Being democrat couldn't be in the list because Biden is a democrat too.  So what list would you have used?   {You know there is only one human race on planet earth, right?]

Edited by Desertrat56
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Desertrat56 said:

Notice I mentioned female first and I went to race as those were the only two reasons I could think of.  Can you think of other reasons?   Being democrat couldn't be in the list because Biden is a democrat too.  So what list would you have used?   

Really?   The only reason to dislike her is because your sexist or racist.   Thanks for proving my point.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Myles said:

Really?   The only reason to dislike her is because your sexist or racist.   Thanks for proving my point.

What point?   That you call out everyone every time you think they have said something inappropriate.  You are the one who brought up race.   I mentioned skin tone.  There is only one race and you bring it up more than anyone, as if there are multiple races.  Maybe practice changing the words you use to describe people and you might find that you can accept that we are all human and noticing other's issues with skin tone is not helpful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Desertrat56 said:

What point?   That you call out everyone every time you think they have said something inappropriate.  You are the one who brought up race.   I mentioned skin tone.  There is only one race and you bring it up more than anyone, as if there are multiple races.  Maybe practice changing the words you use to describe people and you might find that you can accept that we are all human and noticing other's issues with skin tone is not helpful.

Nice try.   You brought up race and doubled down on sexism or racism being the only reason not to like her.   Like I said, it's your go to move to call a person racist all the time.  

 

" I mentioned female first and I went to race as those were the only two reasons I could think of.  "

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Myles said:

Nice try.   You brought up race and doubled down on sexism or racism being the only reason not to like her.   Like I said, it's your go to move to call a person racist all the time.  

 

" I mentioned female first and I went to race as those were the only two reasons I could think of.  "

Nope, I did not use the word "race" until you started thrashing about over it.     I am done with you.  Have a nice life, I hope you resolve your fears over what ever .

  • Haha 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Desertrat56 said:

Nope, I did not use the word "race" until you started thrashing about over it.     I am done with you.  Have a nice life, I hope you resolve your fears over what ever .

Take a nap.   People are not as bad as you want them to be.  

Worded it "dark skin" instead of race to shield yourself from criticism.  :w00t:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Desertrat56 said:

I was responding to @OverSword's idiotic comment about Harris becoming president if Biden was impeached.

What's idiotic about that?  It's a fact.  She's the VP.  

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can the GOP just die off already? They've proven they have no interest in governing, and they're already actively killing off their voters, so lets just pick things up a bit BEFORE we go completely down the tubes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Desertrat56 said:

Notice I mentioned female first and I went to skin color as those were the only two reasons I could think of.  Can you think of other reasons?

Seriously?  How about she's unfit for the job?  One of the worst politicians serving and among the least popular of the democratic presidential candidates.  She came in last in her own state out of the 12 remaining candidates.  She was elected as a  senator and then foisted on the Biden ticket because of the political clout of Pelosi and I feel Pelosi is a power mad evil person.  She is Pelosi's creature and always has been.  I could probably think of more reasons that have nothing to do with race or gender but I feel I've already proven those aren't reasons I would object to her serving as president.  I would however welcome and approve Tulsi Gabbard or Nikki Haley, also not because of their gender or race but notably they are both female and brown.  So just please.....

Edited by OverSword
  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, OverSword said:

What's idiotic about that?  It's a fact.  She's the VP.  

It was the words you used, indicating we should worry about that.  Maybe I was triggered and misunderstood your intention.  But I have read your posts and don't think I misunderstood.   If I did misunderstand, let me know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Desertrat56 said:

It was the words you used, indicating we should worry about that.

IMO we should worry about that.  Not because she's a female or because of her skin color.

Edited by OverSword
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, OverSword said:

IMO we should worry about that.  Not because she's a female or because of her skin color.

You never answered my question (as clumsy as it was), why should we worry about it?

  • Confused 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Desertrat56 said:

You never answered my question (as clumsy as it was), why should we worry about it?

  

50 minutes ago, OverSword said:

Seriously?  How about she's unfit for the job?  One of the worst politicians serving and among the least popular of the democratic presidential candidates.  She came in last in her own state out of the 12 remaining candidates.  She was elected as a  senator and then foisted on the Biden ticket because of the political clout of Pelosi and I feel Pelosi is a power mad evil person.  She is Pelosi's creature and always has been.  I could probably think of more reasons that have nothing to do with race or gender but I feel I've already proven those aren't reasons I would object to her serving as president.  I would however welcome and approve Tulsi Gabbard or Nikki Haley, also not because of their gender or race but notably they are both female and brown.  So just please.....

 

Edited by OverSword
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, OverSword said:

  

Seriously?  How about she's unfit for the job?  One of the worst politicians serving and among the least popular of the democratic presidential candidates.  She came in last in her own state out of the 12 remaining candidates.  She was elected as a  senator and then foisted on the Biden ticket because of the political clout of Pelosi and I feel Pelosi is a power mad evil person.  She is Pelosi's creature and always has been.  I could probably think of more reasons that have nothing to do with race or gender but I feel I've already proven those aren't reasons I would object to her serving as president.  I would however welcome and approve Tulsi Gabbard or Nikki Haley, also not because of their gender or race but notably they are both female and brown.  So just please.....

I guess I missed that when Myles and I went into our triggers.   How can she be more unfit that Trump, Mrs. Clinton or Pence was?   We are not going to ever get a fit candidate for president until we get rid of the strangle hold the two parties have on our voting system and politicians.   They are all unfit, bought and paid for puppets.  The first thing we need to do is get rid of the dinosaurs in congress and the senate.   If Pelosi has so much clout with the democratic party, that is the problem, not Harris.  And like I said in an earlier post, it doesn't matter who is president, nothing changes and the damage that is done is not because of the puppet, but because of who owns the puppet.  So you are polarized instead of standing back and seeing how your polarization is manufactured to keep us at each other's throats instead of actually doing something to get rid of the puppet masters.  You are a puppet as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Something tells me that Putin, China and other "undesirables" are laughing their **** off as the United States of America implodes.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, pallidin said:

Something tells me that Putin, China and other "undesirables" are laughing their **** off as the United States of America implodes.

Well they can laugh their asses off into their graves because we will remain the most powerful country in the world for the next 100 years at least.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gender and skin color are never any reason to determine one's capabilities.  It's deeds and character.  We've seen her deeds and she has poor character.  She should not be President because of the content of her character, not because of the color of her skin.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, RavenHawk said:

Gender and skin color are never any reason to determine one's capabilities.  It's deeds and character.  We've seen her deeds and she has poor character.  She should not be President because of the content of her character, not because of the color of her skin.

Yet you love Trump, so why the double standard?

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know this sounds crazy, but here is a strategy the Republicans might try:  have a platform besides follow Trump.  Leave that in if you want, but it takes more to win 2022..

For example support infrastructure, instead of opposing, but do it in a Republican way with more focus on budgets and spending.  60% of citizens support it, but a lot more would if finances were more balanced.  We need it for competition.

If they want to say they are a party of the people, then be so.  support middle class agenda and not a contributing elite agenda.  Example drug prices.  The Democrats caved on drug prices because of their pharma dondors.. What an opening for the Republicans.  The list goes on.

Stop BSing about invading Afghanistan again as a fear tactic.  Blame Biden for the less than perfect withdrawal then refocus on fighting terrorism where it appears.  Most Americans want security but are tired of being the world's policeman

Reality check: Biden's approval rating has fallen to 47% after the Afghanistan and covid problems.  By golly, that is 2% lower than Trump's highest ever approval.  It is going to take a platform and policies that have positive appeal to get enough votes to win a majority even with the help of  core Trump supporters.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.