Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -

US must have only one religion


Eldorado

Recommended Posts

 
On 11/24/2021 at 11:21 PM, DieChecker said:

I think if someone wanted Trumps opinion on having only one religion, he'd be confused and not get what he was being asked. Because the idea is just so ridiculous.

Even Mao's China, and North Korea, had many practicing religion in secret. Theres no way a one religion mandate could work in the US.

Even the old Soviet Union had a provision in its constitution respecting the rights of citizens to their own forms of religious supersticion.

Doug

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/14/2021 at 5:23 PM, Eldorado said:

 

“If we are going to have one nation under God, which we must, we have to have one religion," he said.

"One nation under God, and one religion under God.”

 

Secular government cannot deliver a non-secular result, and the U.S. Constitution is a secular document.

Anyone who doesn’t understand this is simply ignorant and should be ignored.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/27/2021 at 4:03 AM, Raptor Witness said:

Secular government cannot deliver a non-secular result, and the U.S. Constitution is a secular document.

Anyone who doesn’t understand this is simply ignorant and should be ignored.

What if a secular result is what you're looking for?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, Doug1066 said:

What if a secular result is what you're looking for?

The freedom of religion also means the freedom to worship no one, except perhaps yourself.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/24/2021 at 6:51 PM, DieChecker said:

Yeah Antifa is a b****.

Antifa is mostly a figment of Trump's imagination and a few of his QAnon nut jobs; although there are a few around for real.  Antifa people have committed one murder since Charlottsville and may have committed a second.  Compare that with over 40 for the right-wingnuts.  https://theconversation.com/fact-check-us-is-there-an-antifa-threat-in-the-united-states-as-donald-trump-claims-150555

Antifa is a threat that isn't.

Doug

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Raptor Witness said:

The freedom of religion also means the freedom to worship no one, except perhaps yourself.

Or worship a figment of one's own imagination.

Doug

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Doug1066 said:

Or worship a figment of one's own imagination.

Doug

Perhaps, but who gets to decide the “figment?”  Freedom means “we the people” decide, not the state.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Doug1066 said:

Antifa is a threat that isn't.

Doug

I think all the downtown Portland businesses that have folded up, and the boarded up windows over ten plus blocks, would tend to disagree with you. Theres even a Portland Antifa Facebook page that they use to pre-setup brick piles, and shield and club caches before they go riot.

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Raptor Witness said:

Perhaps, but who gets to decide the “figment?”  Freedom means “we the people” decide, not the state.

The IRS already decides who's a church and who isn't.  Those who are a church don't have to pay income taxes.

Churches (profit-making businesses) are exempt from many local taxes.  They free-load on police, fire, street lighting, streets, water, sewer and other services without paying for their use.  The state you live in decides which of these is a church.

In Oklahoma, churches can have a savings account.  But atheists have to have a $1500 minimum balance.  "We the people" do not have a right to choose their own religion.  They already lost it.

Doug

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DieChecker said:

I think all the downtown Portland businesses that have folded up, and the boarded up windows over ten plus blocks, would tend to disagree with you. Theres even a Portland Antifa Facebook page that they use to pre-setup brick piles, and shield and club caches before they go riot.

Portland is better-organized than most.  But how many of those rumors you're reporting were the work of right-wing attack squads?

Doug

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Isn't this a suggestion to prevent any group of quacks setting up a Church calling themselves "Christians" then getting on with causing as much misery for other people as they can manage in direct contradiction to the teachings of the gospels.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
6 hours ago, ethereal_scout said:

Isn't this a suggestion to prevent any group of quacks setting up a Church calling themselves "Christians" then getting on with causing as much misery for other people as they can manage in direct contradiction to the teachings of the gospels.

Well…. Prosperity Gospel Churches already exist….

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/15/2021 at 9:07 AM, RavenHawk said:

It doesn’t really matter because it raised a good question.  Even though this nation is Christian dominated (and there is nothing wrong with that), this is still the most tolerant of religion in the world.  I think Flynn was referring to morals rather than a particular religion.  And hence, implying that this nation needs to be moral and not immoral.  As long as we remain a moral people, the full promise of the Constitution will be realized.  But once we travel down the immoral path, decay and destruction follows.

 

That has never been my experience that the christian religion is tolerant, nor even the  most tolerant.   I think Buddhism is tolerant, a major tenant of that religion, but nothing I have ever seen indicates tolerance is taught as part of the christian religion.

AND the foundation of this country (U.S.) is freedom of religion, which indicates that there is more than one religion allowed in this country.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Doug1066 said:

Portland is better-organized than most.  But how many of those rumors you're reporting were the work of right-wing attack squads?

Doug

Anifa is prone to violent battles with far-right groups.  As they say, it takes two to tango and without extreme-right hate groups to battle, there would be no Antifa.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rose_City_Antifa

Doug

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Doug1066 said:

Anifa is prone to violent battles with far-right groups.  As they say, it takes two to tango and without extreme-right hate groups to battle, there would be no Antifa.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rose_City_Antifa

Doug

That almost sounds like support for vigilantism.

Vigilantism /vɪdʒɪˈlæntɪzəm/ is the act of enforcement, investigation or punishment of perceived offenses without legal authority.[1]

Kind of like when a Far Right group gets a permit to demonstrate and Antifa shows up and a bsttle/riot ensues. One side git permission to be there and one didn't.

FYI, Portland doesn't give permits to far right organizations anymore, but back in Trump days it did happen, and the Left always showed up to fight.

Antifa are criminals, not heros. At least in Portland this is true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, DieChecker said:

Vigilantism /vɪdʒɪˈlæntɪzəm/ is the act of enforcement, investigation or punishment of perceived offenses without legal authority.[1]

You mean like Kyle Rittenhouse?

I agree that Antifa engages in criminal acts and should be held to account, the same as Proud Boys, MAGA rioters and others.

BUT:  If the police can't/won't protect demonstrators, then somebody has to do the job.

Doug

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.