Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -

Marjorie Taylor Greene mocked for appearing to claim that cancer is transmissible


Eldorado
 Share

Recommended Posts

Will you people stop voting republican already? Every time you do, the country nearly crashes and the incoming democrats have to devote most of their time to un****ing the mess they made. Throw in the whole 'FYI we're blatantly fascist now and tried to overthrow the government a year ago', and it's just unforgivable. Say what you will about liberals, but we're neither fascist, NOR this bloody stupid. 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Autochthon1990 said:

Will you people stop voting republican already? Every time you do, the country nearly crashes and the incoming democrats have to devote most of their time to un****ing the mess they made. Throw in the whole 'FYI we're blatantly fascist now and tried to overthrow the government a year ago', and it's just unforgivable. Say what you will about liberals, but we're neither fascist, NOR this bloody stupid. 

To be fair- she moved to a region where she ran unopposed. 

That's how she got elected.

Edited by Gromdor
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Autochthon1990 said:

Say what you will about liberals, but we're neither fascist, NOR this bloody stupid. 

C'mon Man!

You really want me to go find all the stupid Democrat quotes? Rep Waters is a gold mine of saying stupid stuff.

I'll say this though, I think Greene is not even the dullest tool in the shed.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Greene is the most toxic, malicious, aggresive, complacent and stupid person I`ve ever seen in US politics. I cannot understand why people vote/d for her, maybe its because these people are of the same mindset. Likely, most likely.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, toast said:

Greene is the most toxic, malicious, aggresive, complacent and stupid person I`ve ever seen in US politics. I cannot understand why people vote/d for her, maybe its because these people are of the same mindset. Likely, most likely.

Gromdor said it was because she ran unopposed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is there a competition in the USA for the dumbest comment?  Do you, like, win a years worth of MacDonald "burgers" if you can prove you are less intelligent than a dead slug?

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Essan said:

Is there a competition in the USA for the dumbest comment?  Do you, like, win a years worth of MacDonald "burgers" if you can prove you are less intelligent than a dead slug?

Why, yes.  We call it, "elections".

  • Haha 2
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, DieChecker said:

I'll say this though, I think Greene is not even the dullest tool in the shed.

Wow. Big call. I don't think many would go that far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, toast said:

Greene is the most toxic, malicious, aggresive, complacent and stupid person I`ve ever seen in US politics. 

AOC says "hold my beer".

  • Like 1
  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Autochthon1990 said:

Will you people stop voting republican already? Every time you do, the country nearly crashes and the incoming democrats have to devote most of their time to un****ing the mess they made. Throw in the whole 'FYI we're blatantly fascist now and tried to overthrow the government a year ago', and it's just unforgivable. Say what you will about liberals, but we're neither fascist, NOR this bloody stupid. 

Yep, all the Democrat run regions and cities are doing great!

Politicians are almost all scoundrels who look out only for themselves.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, acidhead said:

She tweeted this on purpose.  There's 4 more tweets under this one.

:D   

 

 

 

 

None of which has to do with cancer...or insinuate that this tweet was satire.  But hey, if you would rather roll with she was making a joking tweet about cancer...then that might be worse.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can argue that it’s a false comparison because cancer isn’t transmissible like covid. I think that’s a perfectly valid and rational position. However, it’s  pretty clear her intent was to compare deaths resulting from from the two, not infer the two shared specific and unmentioned common traits. That is what the MSM is “appearing” to have done. Accusing her of “appearing to” claim cancer is transmissible requires some creative license with her words, Utilizing this same creative license with her words you could just as well claimed MTG was “appearing” to claim cancer is a Chinese developed bioweapon.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, el midgetron said:

You can argue that it’s a false comparison because cancer isn’t transmissible like covid. I think that’s a perfectly valid and rational position. However, it’s  pretty clear her intent was to compare deaths resulting from from the two, not infer the two shared specific and unmentioned common traits. That is what the MSM is “appearing” to have done. Accusing her of “appearing to” claim cancer is transmissible requires some creative license with her words, Utilizing this same creative license with her words you could just as well claimed MTG was “appearing” to claim cancer is a Chinese developed bioweapon.

It's not a rational position and MTG has a history of saying incredibly stupid things. This is just another one. 

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, psyche101 said:

It's not a rational position and MTG has a history of saying incredibly stupid things. This is just another one. 

It’s not a rational position to say her comparison was false? 
 

Sorry, but what the MSM is telling you she “appeared” to say, she didn’t say.

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seriously, they put “appearing to” in the headline because they know it’s not #$&@%! True. You guys will swear it’s 100% true but the people who told you about it will choose their words to avoid litigation. What you are claiming is there isn’t there.

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, el midgetron said:

It’s not a rational position to say her comparison was false? 
 

Are you saying you agree with her or not? I read your post as saying you feel her claim is rational. Ate you saying that is not the case?

31 minutes ago, el midgetron said:

Sorry, but what the MSM is telling you she “appeared” to say, she didn’t say.

MSM not required. You Breitbart junkies don't seem to realise there's a lot of sources recording things these days.

Lol, she is dumb as dog doodoo. If you think she is smart, well that's just hilarious. MTG makes Paris Hilton look like a top physics professor.

Edited by psyche101
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

You can argue that it’s a false comparison because cancer isn’t transmissible like covid. I think that’s a perfectly valid and rational position.

 

“that”

1. 

used to identify a specific person or thing observed by the speaker.

"that's his wife over there"

2. 

referring to a specific thing previously mentioned, known, or understood.

"that's a good idea"

***Edit****

ha, ok. I can see how my comment could be confusing. My bad,

The “that” in the second sentence quoted in this post, references what I argue is logical to conclude as a false conclusion in the first,

 

 

Edited by el midgetron
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, el midgetron said:

 

“that”

1. 

used to identify a specific person or thing observed by the speaker.

"that's his wife over there"

2. 

referring to a specific thing previously mentioned, known, or understood.

"that's a good idea"

***Edit****

ha, ok. I can see how my comment could be confusing. My bad,

The “that” in the second sentence quoted in this post, references what I argue is logical to conclude as a false conclusion in the first,

 

 

If you agree that her comparison is false then we are in agreement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, psyche101 said:

If you agree that her comparison is false then we are in agreement.

I already explained how our opinions are different., re-read #17. 
 

Do you guys speak good English? You believe a fake headline about the contents of a 40 word tweet which you apparently can’t read on your own. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.