Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -

Hiker is stalked for several days by 'Bigfoot' in Oregon


UM-Bot

Recommended Posts

There's a chance Bigfoot sightings are just people getting a bad look at some of the world's shaggiest hobos.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/24/2021 at 2:27 PM, evalha said:

...perhaps one day everyone will have a small device capable of high-quality video or photos, then we'll be able to settle the Bigfoot question once and for all.

Well said. We can also solve that UFO mystery. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/26/2021 at 9:13 PM, DanL said:

AND if you identify it as some form of human related species it will be a minority and be TOTALLY untouchable and allowed as such to do whatever it wishes!!!

Haha, yes, it's best we don't find it. We'll owe it 'reparations'. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/26/2021 at 8:40 PM, Test Subject said:

There's a chance Bigfoot sightings are just people getting a bad look at some of the world's shaggiest hobos.

A poster on a bigfoot enthusiast forum once posted up a picture of small rock formation he insisted couldn't possibly be anything but bigfoot symbology, completely oblivious that hobos/homeless have an large lexicon of symbols; the one he posted meant safe camping here.

https://www.logodesignlove.com/hobo-signs-and-symbols

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

According to the story, an experienced hiker became fearful for their life after being followed by an unidentified creature, yet the enraged and exhausted hiker chased the creature away by running after it. Makes sense lol. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/28/2021 at 10:49 AM, Resume said:

A poster on a bigfoot enthusiast forum once posted up a picture of small rock formation he insisted couldn't possibly be anything but bigfoot symbology, completely oblivious that hobos/homeless have an large lexicon of symbols; the one he posted meant safe camping here.

https://www.logodesignlove.com/hobo-signs-and-symbols

Quite a few of those can be found in the forests of the PNW. I've seen them and scared some homeless folk that I encountered out in the woods. What's intriguing is when I asked if they had seen anything while camped out there they responded with "You mean like bigfoot? No, nothing like that." They would then have a good laugh at my expense.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 12/30/2021 at 1:42 PM, Trelane said:

Quite a few of those can be found in the forests of the PNW. I've seen them and scared some homeless folk that I encountered out in the woods. What's intriguing is when I asked if they had seen anything while camped out there they responded with "You mean like bigfoot? No, nothing like that." They would then have a good laugh at my expense.

The poster I'm referencing was indeed reporting from the PNW where "no one ever goes" despite the fact he was there, and others, quite obviously.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You shouldn’t be hiking in large mountain ranges and forests alone. Especially alone and unarmed. I’m assuming unarmed because it’s Oregon and the person telling the story never mentioned a gun…. Which if you truly believe you are being stalked by a wild animal you would at least pop a few into the sky as a warning.

 

I would say stalked by a bear but a bear doesn’t usually haulass away from a human like that. I would say they were not really deep in a forest and a local was screwing with them. But who knows. Not a lot to go on in this one.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/11/2022 at 3:01 PM, Nobu said:

You shouldn’t be hiking in large mountain ranges and forests alone. Especially alone and unarmed. I’m assuming unarmed because it’s Oregon and the person telling the story never mentioned a gun…. Which if you truly believe you are being stalked by a wild animal you would at least pop a few into the sky as a warning.

 

I would say stalked by a bear but a bear doesn’t usually haulass away from a human like that. I would say they were not really deep in a forest and a local was screwing with them. But who knows. Not a lot to go on in this one.

The majority of the world wouldn’t need you to be armed. Only a few places to protect yourself from some animals.

And it’s fine to hike alone.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Many people have claimed to been have been stalked by bigfoot, or sasquatch in not only Oregon, but also Washington, Northern California, and British Columbia, some of which occurred before bigfoot was even a name or a popular hoax.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/12/2022 at 8:50 PM, Guyver said:

Many people have claimed to been have been stalked by bigfoot, or sasquatch in not only Oregon, but also Washington, Northern California, and British Columbia, some of which occurred before bigfoot was even a name or a popular hoax.

I wholeheartedly agree with your claim here: People tell stories.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/12/2022 at 8:29 PM, Timothy said:

The majority of the world wouldn’t need you to be armed. Only a few places to protect yourself from some animals.

And it’s fine to hike alone.

You do you 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Resume said:

I wholeheartedly agree with your claim here: People tell stories.

Yep, and some people tell the truth, like I do.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Guyver said:

Yep, and some people tell the truth, like I do.

I like the retort :-)

Some people think that if you can theorize that an event is just a story that was told then that means for certain that the event was just a story. after all. 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Earl.Of.Trumps said:

I like the retort :-)

Some people think that if you can theorize that an event is just a story that was told then that means for certain that the event was just a story. after all. 

 

Right.  And that does happen.  It’s just that I’ve actually done this for myself and had no make up stories because my experience was real. And I was trained for it.  I was doing mountain climbing in Northern California.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Guyver said:

Right.  And that does happen.  It’s just that I’ve actually done this for myself and had no make up stories because my experience was real. And I was trained for it.  I was doing mountain climbing in Northern California.

What were you trained for?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Resume said:

What were you trained for?

Being able to navigate and survive in the woods for days or weeks at a time with only what I can carry in on my back.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Guyver said:

Being able to navigate and survive in the woods for days or weeks at a time with only what I can carry in on my back.

What does being trained in bushcraft have to do with people telling unverifiable, unfalsifiable stories?  I've spent a lifetime outdoors and never once have I attributed an unknown sound to a creature that has never been shown to exist.  No bigfoot anecdote has ever led to the discovery of a bigfoot.  Not a single one.  No bigfoot anecdote has ever led to the discovery of a habitat where one could reliably observe a bigfoot.  Not a single one.

What we possess are a number of stories that have led to exactly nothing.

Edited by Resume
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Earl.Of.Trumps said:

I like the retort :-)

Some people think that if you can theorize that an event is just a story that was told then that means for certain that the event was just a story. after all. 

 

Some people think that unverifiable, unfalsifiable anecdotes are good evidence.  Those people are not doing science, of course; they are doing playground pretend epistomology. 

Edited by Resume
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Guyver said:

Yep, and some people tell the truth, like I do.

Truth of a mythical creature? How does one tell truths of something that doesn't exist?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Resume said:

Some people think that unverifiable, unfalsifiable anecdotes are good evidence.  Those people are not doing science, of course; they are doing playground pretend epistomology. 

Well I am not one of those, but let's face it, we need speculations here, Resume. Otherwise all threads just close down. that's how I see it.

I can name scientific studies being done when all the project director had to go on was theory, such as the search for tachion particles.
nobody begrudges these researchers their right to do that.

Now look at what happens to someone that wants to study UFOs or BigFoot. 

Holy Jelloli! :o

 

 

 

Just to add: There is more evidence of the existence of BigFoot than there is of tachion particles.

Edited by Earl.Of.Trumps
to add
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/25/2021 at 2:26 AM, fred_mc said:

Wonder if you can arrest Bigfoot for burglary and stalking. Probably not, as long as Bigfoot is classified as an animal, it stands above the law.

Actually they can kill the creature without trial. At best they could try for some sort of protection such as being on the endangered species llist

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Earl.Of.Trumps said:

Well I am not one of those, but let's face it, we need speculations here, Resume. Otherwise all threads just close down. that's how I see it.

I can name scientific studies being done when all the project director had to go on was theory, such as the search for tachion particles.
nobody begrudges these researchers their right to do that.

Now look at what happens to someone that wants to study UFOs or BigFoot. 

Holy Jelloli! :o

 

 

 

Just to add: There is more evidence of the existence of BigFoot than there is of tachion particles.

If does a lot of heavy lifting in footie discussions, and that's fine for discussions.  Beyond the ifs, the what, where and why need to be demonstrated. I've never seen good bigfoot evidence; what I've seen are claims that can never be verified.  Good bigfoot evidence would be a bigfoot, or a piece of a bigfoot.  Or a particular habitat where footie-foo-foo can be reliably observed.  We don't have those things; bigfoot is all story, no monkey.

Edited by Resume
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/26/2021 at 9:40 PM, Test Subject said:

There's a chance Bigfoot sightings are just people getting a bad look at some of the world's shaggiest hobos.

Or they are are just some of the worst reports ever

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.