taniwha Posted February 8, 2022 Author #376 Share Posted February 8, 2022 2 minutes ago, Arbenol said: Drunken waltz? You should read your last post again, it's a bit rambling. I've read it a few times and I still don't know what you're trying to say. The bottom line is you've made claims that I've doubted. Don't assume I haven't tried to verify your claims. I have.....and can't. And, apparently, neither can you. But that's because people are creeping into the internet and moving things when you're not looking. That's fine. You can believe what you like. But you can't expect me to believe the same when you can't show it to be true. It makes rational discussion very difficult if not impossible. For example, take this line you wrote: " You say the only people that used that figure was the media?? Really? Why not share your source of information proving that claim? Now, how would I go about proving that someone didn't say something? Wouldn't it be easier to prove that they did (if they did)? If you can't understand that basic point we've really nothing more to say. So, over to you. Thank you. Yet it's concise English. You just come across as hypocritical. That's the point, you say that the only people was the media that used that figure? That's a statement of fact not a hypothetical one. It clears the PM and suggests you know something I don't or your not sharing info. Otherwise it's just ramblings Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!Register a new account
Already have an account? Sign in here.Sign In Now