Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -

Russia Masses Military Equipment Near Ukraine Borders: A Prologue to WWIII?


Grim Reaper 6
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, Grim Reaper 6 said:

Even Russia’s friends are getting upset over its war

Throughout the annual gathering, world leader after world leader had expressed deep discomfort if not outright condemnation over Russia’s war in Ukraine. Even some countries that have stayed friendly with the Kremlin called for a cease-fire or other ways to end the crisis. Few offered words of comfort to Russia. And Russian President Vladimir Putin, who did not attend UNGA, did himself no favors when he announced mid-week that he was escalating the battle and might even use nuclear weapons.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/even-russia-s-friends-are-getting-upset-over-its-war/ar-AA12ctiN?ocid=Peregrine&cvid=0a3fedd20b374d57b1a7f68427f8fafe

More to that, ODKB went to extinct.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Hankenhunter said:

Russians are sending untrained troops to the front.

 

Wonder how long will Russia take to notify the families of the deceased.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Cookie Monster said:

The locals helped them with upside down sunbathing.

Hanging upsidedown ain't the best way to sunbathe...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Democrats divided over whether to send Ukraine long-range weapons to use against Russia

Democrats on Capitol Hill are divided on whether it’s time to start providing Ukraine with more advanced weapons systems as Kyiv proves itself capable with its recent counteroffensive. 

Rep. Gregory Meeks (D-N.Y.), chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, said now is the time to make sure Ukraine can adequately defend itself in the winter months. He didn’t offer support for providing longer-range systems.

“I think that the systems that we’re giving them — and that we need to look at — are the systems that may be able to knock some of the incoming missiles from Russia coming in which is killing innocent Ukrainians … or to try to make sure that they have what they need to defend themselves from those kinds of missiles,” Meeks said.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/democrats-divided-over-whether-to-send-ukraine-long-range-weapons-to-use-against-russia/ar-AA12ebzZ?ocid=EMMX&cvid=1a9f145b2bd54b7783a7efcf95552056

  • Like 1
  • Sad 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Grim Reaper 6 said:

Democrats divided over whether to send Ukraine long-range weapons to use against Russia

Democrats on Capitol Hill are divided on whether it’s time to start providing Ukraine with more advanced weapons systems as Kyiv proves itself capable with its recent counteroffensive. 

Rep. Gregory Meeks (D-N.Y.), chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, said now is the time to make sure Ukraine can adequately defend itself in the winter months. He didn’t offer support for providing longer-range systems.

[...]

Isn't lend-lease implements whatever weoponry deliverance? WTF?

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Grim Reaper 6 said:

Democrats divided over whether to send Ukraine long-range weapons to use against Russia

Democrats on Capitol Hill are divided on whether it’s time to start providing Ukraine with more advanced weapons systems as Kyiv proves itself capable with its recent counteroffensive. 

Rep. Gregory Meeks (D-N.Y.), chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, said now is the time to make sure Ukraine can adequately defend itself in the winter months. He didn’t offer support for providing longer-range systems.

“I think that the systems that we’re giving them — and that we need to look at — are the systems that may be able to knock some of the incoming missiles from Russia coming in which is killing innocent Ukrainians … or to try to make sure that they have what they need to defend themselves from those kinds of missiles,” Meeks said.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/democrats-divided-over-whether-to-send-ukraine-long-range-weapons-to-use-against-russia/ar-AA12ebzZ?ocid=EMMX&cvid=1a9f145b2bd54b7783a7efcf95552056

Well if they want Ukraine to win the war they should give it to them.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, bmk1245 said:

Isn't lend-lease implements whatever weoponry deliverance? WTF?

No it is not, otherwise the US would make available nuclear and other non conventional weapons 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ThereWeAreThen said:

Cause smokings bad mkay.

I wonder if it was the same careless smoker that blew up huge ammo dumps?:whistle:

  • Like 5
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, ThereWeAreThen said:

Well if they want Ukraine to win the war they should give it to them.

I don’t disagree I am just providing current information. Their point of view is pretty simple they do not want NATO and US Troops to enter the conflict at this point I think they are waiting to see what Russia does next. In my opinion the US is going to become involved in this conflict no matter what, so I agree we should give them the Weapons they want because the more damaged the Russian Military is the better for the Western Powers when they are pulled into the conflict.

If Vladimir Putin does use WMDs then we should respond in the same manner, but I am certain my opinion is not a popular one with most people. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, bmk1245 said:

Isn't lend-lease implements whatever weoponry deliverance? WTF?

No lend-Lease means they will be required to pay for the Weapons in the future it has nothing to do with giving them any weapon they want. That’s why at the end of WWII all the Allied Nations were paying the United States for the equipment supplied during the war throughout the 1950s. 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Hankenhunter said:

fark_KPnD6zjo6s1KqBUZMsVAWC0uDTI.jpg

Training made simple.  Send the recruits in on an assault mission, one rifle every ten.  The one that come out alive with the rifle is fully trained and qualified, the ones that come back without a rifle are shot as traitors and the ones that don't come back at all failed their training. 

  • Like 3
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Black Red Devil said:

Training made simple.  Send the recruits in on an assault mission, one rifle every ten.  The one that come out alive with the rifle is fully trained and qualified, the ones that come back without a rifle are shot as traitors and the ones that don't come back at all failed their training. 

Ukraine should leave crap loads of vodka along the fronts. With LSD in it.

Then have someone shout "ZOMBIES!!!". 

 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Siberian Enlistment Officer Shot as Recruitment Offices Torched Across Russia

Gruesome footage from an Irkutsk region military recruitment office showed a man in fatigues shooting another man point-blank and sending others scattering from the assembly hall.

The shooting marks one of the most dramatic instances of outrage over Putin’s draft of around 300,000 reservists for battle in Ukraine. 

Since Putin made the surprise announcement Wednesday, at least 20 recruitment offices were torched across Russia’s 11 time zones, according to the independent news website Mediazona and The Moscow Times' Russian service.

https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2022/09/26/siberian-enlistment-officer-shot-as-recruitment-offices-torched-across-russia-a78886

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Black Red Devil said:

Training made simple.  Send the recruits in on an assault mission, one rifle every ten.  The one that come out alive with the rifle is fully trained and qualified, the ones that come back without a rifle are shot as traitors and the ones that don't come back at all failed their training. 

Sounds very similar to the Iran - Iraq war the Iranians were losing because at that time the US was supporting the Iraqis. In some Cases the Iranians used young children on bicycles to charge Iraqi lines, these kids were armed only with grenades and they started to use civilians in mass swarm attacks basically unarmed needless to say the Iranian dead piled up so high they could be used as fighting positions. My comments here are not inaccurate or an exaggeration it must have been a horrible sight!

https://www.historynet.com/the-iran-iraq-war-a-bloody-stalemate/

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Hankenhunter said:

Ukraine should leave crap loads of vodka along the fronts. With LSD in it.

Then have someone shout "ZOMBIES!!!". 

 

The United States developed a Chemical Agent called BZ in the 1950s it was designed as a incapacitating agent that would actually cause many of the effects of LSD. The agent was delivered as a gas and would take effect in an hour or less, once affected Soldiers would become combat ineffective for 12 hours or more. I don’t believe it was ever used by the US in a conflict however, it was tested on US Soldiers in the 1950s.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK201480/

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • The topic was locked
  • The topic was unlocked

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   1 member

    • jules99