Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -

Russia Masses Military Equipment Near Ukraine Borders: A Prologue to WWIII?


Grim Reaper 6

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Helen of Annoy said:

It's not superhuman for pilots and maintenance crews to switch to a different type of plane in less than 2 and half years. 

So forgive me but I had enough of your weird insisting that Ukrainians are slow, or that Western equipment is just too complex for use by humans who were not born in your country. As if you don't have the same percentage of cretins like any other god given place on Earth. 

I'm not saying any of that, just that it takes time. You have a computer, check it out for yourself.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Slowly but steadily, pro-russians are learning that they made some bad choices :lol: 

Of course I'm kidding. pro-russians are incapable of learning.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Helen of Annoy said:

Pedal. You sure English is your first language?

Kidding :D Possibly. 

No English is not my first language. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Unusual Tournament said:

Ultimately someone has to put their foot on the gas peddle. 

Hi UT

Yes because it is a tool created to be used. Even when we have autonomous cars, jets or tanks that can operate independently they will still need humans to give it directions and programming. Weapons are not at war they are the tools of war.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Helen of Annoy said:

Slowly but steadily, pro-russians are learning that they made some bad choices :lol: 

Of course I'm kidding. pro-russians are incapable of learning.  

I think the stakes have been raised to such a point Russia cannot be allowed to win. Which is really dangerous for everyone. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, jmccr8 said:

Hi UT

Yes because it is a tool created to be used. Even when we have autonomous cars, jets or tanks that can operate independently they will still need humans to give it directions and programming. Weapons are not at war they are the tools of war.

Thank you my point exactly. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Hammerclaw said:

I'm not saying any of that, just that it takes time. You have a computer, check it out for yourself.

There's war in Ukraine, check it yourself, but not by listening to Tucker. He's a russian mouthpiece. 

Because there's war, training must be several times shorter than it usually takes (10 weeks instead of 10 months, for example), or else the war would be over by the time training is finished. Imagine if WWII crews were training for 2-3 years. Which is how the "genius" excuse for obstructing Ukrainian defence will not work. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Hammerclaw said:

I'm not saying any of that, just that it takes time. You have a computer, check it out for yourself.

The west is drip feeding Ukraine weapons so the war doesn’t escalate. NATO don’t want to war to go beyond a stalemate. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Unusual Tournament said:

Oh I love the A-10. Beast and a half. Bit worried it will be too slow to avoid extensive Russian SAM. Thou mopping up peripheral Russian units will be fun to watch. I’ve read the soldiers in A’stan loved this bird

I’m betting some will go with these radar searching missiles.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, godnodog said:

I’m betting some will go with these radar searching missiles.

Don’t really know mate. I know they’re really useful against isolated and soft targets in uncontested airspace. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Unusual Tournament said:

No English is not my first language. 

Tell Hammer how long it took for you to learn the basics. 

 

2 minutes ago, Unusual Tournament said:

The west is drip feeding Ukraine weapons so the war doesn’t escalate. NATO don’t want to war to go beyond a stalemate. 

Firstly, Ukraine is going into offensive in relatively near future.

Secondly, on top of Stoltenberg saying that the heavy weapons are going to Ukraine, also this: 

 

:D 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Unusual Tournament said:

Don’t really know mate. I know they’re really useful against isolated and soft targets in uncontested airspace. 

I didn’t made myself clear, they will be equipped with missiles that activity search enemy Sam and radar stations.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I`m going to predict by the end of this year Germany and Poland will have been nuked.

But hey, Britain is safe as it has nukes too, yippeeee!!!

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Helen of Annoy said:

Tell Hammer how long it took for you to learn the basics. 

 

Firstly, Ukraine is going into offensive in relatively near future.

Secondly, on top of Stoltenberg saying that the heavy weapons are going to Ukraine, also this: 

 

:D 

Who is hammer? Is it that the rap artist MC Hammer ? Cause if it is I do not know him. 

Ukraine isn’t going anywhere in a hurry. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Cookie Monster said:

I`m going to predict by the end of this year Germany and Poland will have been nuked.

But hey, Britain is safe as it has nukes too, yippeeee!!!

Well this is where this is headed. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, godnodog said:

I didn’t made myself clear, they will be equipped with missiles that activity search enemy Sam and radar stations.

I know what you meant. And I do not know. I guess they could. But I would think a fast jet like F-16 would do the job better. The war has gone on for 12 months Ukrainians should have been gifted those months ago. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Unusual Tournament said:

Who is hammer? Is it that the rap artist MC Hammer ? Cause if it is I do not know him. 

Ukraine isn’t going anywhere in a hurry. 

Hammerclaw. 

I was going to use you as an example of a non-native English speaker who is not slow, but, apparently, forget it.  

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Unusual Tournament said:

 

Ukraine isn’t going anywhere in a hurry. 

You sure? These look rather agile. 

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Helen of Annoy said:

Hammerclaw. 

I was going to use you as an example of a non-native English speaker who is not slow, but, apparently, forget it.  

…so it was a compliment after all and not a reference to a building hammer. Like UT got hit on the head with a hammer and is not cleaver for not supporting Ukraine as much as Helen would like. 
 

thanks for the clarification. I feel better about myself already

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Helen of Annoy said:

You sure? These look rather agile. 

 

America providing RV’s would be against the Geneva Conventions 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Unusual Tournament said:

…so it was a compliment after all and not a reference to a building hammer. Like UT got hit on the head with a hammer and is not cleaver for not supporting Ukraine as much as Helen would like. 
 

thanks for the clarification. I feel better about myself already

Not so fast. Don't feel better about yourself just yet. 

Because you just admitted you're not exactly committed to supporting Ukraine, while your narrative was that you support Ukraine fully, but you're only being "realistic" or at the same time "just playing devil's advocate". 

So which is it? (Rhetorical question.) 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Helen of Annoy said:

Not so fast. Don't feel better about yourself just yet. 

Because you just admitted you're not exactly committed to supporting Ukraine, while your narrative was that you support Ukraine fully, but you're only being "realistic" or at the same time "just playing devil's advocate". 

So which is it? (Rhetorical question.) 

I can be both. Yes I’m pretty amazing, I know. Being realistic by definition is taking in the facts. Playing devils advocate is a great way to accept facts. You should try it if only to show you’re not consumed with Ukraines war. Ukraine cannot win this war and no amount of postings military equipment and Twitter articles is gonna change that for them Helen. Russia has more nuclear bombs than the rest of the planet combined. America will not go nuclear for Ukraine. Russia can end this right now with one bomb dropped on Keiv. These are facts and dangerous times, Helen. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Unusual Tournament said:

I can be both. Yes I’m pretty amazing, I know. Being realistic by definition is taking in the facts. Playing devils advocate is a great way to accept facts. You should try it if only to show you’re not consumed with Ukraines war. Ukraine cannot win this war and no amount of postings military equipment and Twitter articles is gonna change that for them Helen. Russia has more nuclear bombs than the rest of the planet combined. America will not go nuclear for Ukraine. Russia can end this right now with one bomb dropped on Keiv. These are facts and dangerous times, Helen. 

:lol: 

Cut the amount of solovyov you're taking. Though it was kadyrov that said today, exactly that what you just posted :lol: 

 

'night now, here's something to drive you insane while I'm gone

 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • The topic was locked
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.