cormac mac airt Posted August 26, 2022 #951 Share Posted August 26, 2022 3 minutes ago, larryp said: YHWH You must remember that YHWH told the coupe to be fruitful and fill the earth, and that's what he meant.. Since human genetics DOESN’T support that conclusion we can dismiss it for lack of evidence. cormac 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
larryp Posted August 26, 2022 #952 Share Posted August 26, 2022 10 minutes ago, cormac mac airt said: Since that particular method WASN’T used it’s completely irrelevant. And since another method was used and determined that the sites I mentioned were older than your Adam we can put your fantasy to bed. cormac YHWH Wrong: Radiometric dating is unreliable, Period. Now follow my lips closely; it's unreliable. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cormac mac airt Posted August 26, 2022 #953 Share Posted August 26, 2022 11 minutes ago, larryp said: YHWH Wrong: Radiometric dating is unreliable, Period. Now follow my lips closely; it's unreliable. Try again as radiocarbon AND uranium thorium dating ARE BOTH types of radiometric dating and in the post you used THEY BOTH confirmed the same date. If ignorance is bliss you’re in Nirvana. cormac 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
larryp Posted August 26, 2022 #954 Share Posted August 26, 2022 1 minute ago, cormac mac airt said: Since human genetics DOESN’T support that conclusion we can dismiss it for lack of evidence. cormac YHWH Geology, archeology, history, historians, and especially YHWH word testify to the above conclusion; hands down, pal. You are in denial, in cahoots with your billions-and-billions of years of "fantasy club." 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cormac mac airt Posted August 26, 2022 #955 Share Posted August 26, 2022 3 minutes ago, larryp said: YHWH Geology, archeology, history, historians, and especially YHWH word testify to the above conclusion; hands down, pal. You are in denial, in cahoots with your billions-and-billions of years of "fantasy club." None of the bold is true and you’ve never provided evidence to suggest otherwise. You do however lie like a politician. And just like a politician you and used TP share the same defect, you’re both full of ****e and should be flushed down the toilet. cormac 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jmccr8 Posted August 26, 2022 #956 Share Posted August 26, 2022 35 minutes ago, larryp said: YHWH You must remember that YHWH told the coupe to be fruitful and fill the earth, and that's what he meant.. Hi Larry Working in construction one hears lots of guys crying about not getting any and pulling 12-16 hour shifts for months on end so no wonder eh. it’s only in the last couple of hundred years with better housing, sanitation and medicine/science that mortality rates changed. The point is it is impossible for that type of population growth and dispersion in 6000 years. If you have verifiable documentation that shows this is possible to support your position then add them for review and discussion . Other than that you are just making baseless opinions that do not make any significant point unless your aim is to be aimless . 5 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
larryp Posted August 26, 2022 #957 Share Posted August 26, 2022 49 minutes ago, cormac mac airt said: Try again as radiocarbon AND uranium thorium dating ARE BOTH types of radiometric dating and in the post you used THEY BOTH confirmed the same date. If ignorance is bliss you’re in Nirvana. cormac YHWH It's unreliable. Period. Sorry!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cormac mac airt Posted August 26, 2022 #958 Share Posted August 26, 2022 (edited) 32 minutes ago, larryp said: YHWH It's unreliable. Period. Sorry!! The only thing unreliable is your knowledge base, PERIOD! BTW Uranium-Helium IS NOT Uranium-Thorium. cormac Edited August 26, 2022 by cormac mac airt 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
larryp Posted August 26, 2022 #959 Share Posted August 26, 2022 35 minutes ago, jmccr8 said: Hi Larry it’s only in the last couple of hundred years with better housing, sanitation and medicine/science that mortality rates changed. The point is it is impossible for that type of population growth and dispersion in 6000 years. YHWH I know you think it's impossible for YHWH to part the Red Sea, feed five thousand with only five loaves and two fish, and he definitely couldn't cause the eath to tilt on its axial at 23.5 degrees every year, just like clockwork, which provides us with four seasons. LOL, take your head out of the sand, man. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
larryp Posted August 26, 2022 #960 Share Posted August 26, 2022 (edited) 24 minutes ago, cormac mac airt said: The only thing unreliable is your knowledge base, PERIOD! BTW Uranium-Helium IS NOT Uranium-Thorium. cormac YHWH Don't flatter yourself!! Edited August 26, 2022 by larryp the details!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jmccr8 Posted August 26, 2022 #961 Share Posted August 26, 2022 4 minutes ago, larryp said: YHWH I know you think it's impossible for YHWH to part the Red Sea, feed five thousand with only five loaves and two fish, and he definitely couldn't cause the eath to tilt on its axial at 23.5 degrees every year, just like clockwork, which provides us with four seasons. LOL, take your head out of the sand, man. Hi Larry Whether I think something is impossible is irrelevant. Make a rebuttal on the scientific evidence and show with documentation that supports your conclusions. I have no expectations of a having a productive exchange of ideas with someone that have no interest in an intelligent manner. Basically the only thing that can transpire is you pizzing off people or being the brunt of a joke. Show me where science is in error on the dating of Gobekli Tepe backed up with credible, testable, verified data. Your opinion needs to be proved beyond smoke and mirrors if you want to claim it as facts. Others have given links to support their position because that is the norm, that you deny them and give nothing that could be considered a well reasoned rebuttal to counter or support your claims. 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
larryp Posted August 26, 2022 #962 Share Posted August 26, 2022 (edited) 30 minutes ago, jmccr8 said: Hi Larry Show me where science is in error on the dating of Gobekli Tepe backed up with credible, testable, verified data. Your opinion needs to be proved beyond smoke and mirrors if you want to claim it as facts. I dont know what you're talking about. Edited August 26, 2022 by larryp 1 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Piney Posted August 26, 2022 #963 Share Posted August 26, 2022 6 hours ago, larryp said: ^^^ Hey man, the point was Radiometric dating is unreliable. Got it? By the way, the post was for Piney, not you. What does that have to do with verifying the historical accuracy of the Bible? 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThereWeAreThen Posted August 26, 2022 #964 Share Posted August 26, 2022 5 hours ago, cormac mac airt said: The only thing unreliable is your knowledge base, PERIOD! BTW Uranium-Helium IS NOT Uranium-Thorium. cormac Hes basically doing tbe same thing most conspiracy theorists do: "I don't understand science therefore it's wrong." 4 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rlyeh Posted August 26, 2022 #965 Share Posted August 26, 2022 11 hours ago, larryp said: Wrong: The Sumerians were around way before the Greeks with archeological fossils to prove it, and we're not talking about your thousand-and-thousands of years "fantasy club" either. archeological fossils? 3 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
newbloodmoon Posted August 26, 2022 #966 Share Posted August 26, 2022 6 hours ago, larryp said: I dont know what I’m talking about. There I fixed it. Your welcome Larry. Time and time again, multiple people on this thread have shown to you the evidence of their claims. As our understanding of science, archaeology, cosmology etc expands than we as a collective can change any possible errors in our current understanding. Arguing for the inerrancy of the bible because well the book said so as well as it’s alleged inspiration amounts to bunkus. Please for the sake of sky daddy will you just site something legitimate to support your claims. 2 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Piney Posted August 26, 2022 #967 Share Posted August 26, 2022 2 hours ago, Rlyeh said: archeological fossils? @Hanslune is one of those. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saru Posted August 26, 2022 #968 Share Posted August 26, 2022 On 8/17/2022 at 8:06 PM, larryp said: Geologists and archeologists say humans are no older than six thousand years. Can you provide a source for this ? Who, specifically, is saying that ? 1 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
acute Posted August 26, 2022 #969 Share Posted August 26, 2022 20 minutes ago, Saru said: Who, specifically, is saying that ? Some guy in a frock told him at church. 8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cormac mac airt Posted August 26, 2022 #970 Share Posted August 26, 2022 6 hours ago, Saru said: Can you provide a source for this ? Who, specifically, is saying that ? If he answers at all Saru he’s likely to tell you to “look it up” so he doesn’t have to eat crow. cormac 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanslune Posted August 27, 2022 #971 Share Posted August 27, 2022 1 hour ago, cormac mac airt said: If he answers at all Saru he’s likely to tell you to “look it up” so he doesn’t have to eat crow. cormac Crow? Nah, larger, more in the size of a hard to find flying blue whale. 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+Desertrat56 Posted August 27, 2022 #972 Share Posted August 27, 2022 On 8/25/2022 at 5:23 PM, Piney said: @cormac mac airt and every other 21st Century historian knows it to be 19th Century American fiction too. So who are these historians, archeologists and geologists who agree with you? Because I have a college background in history, archaeology, geology and ethnobotany and worked for several museums and might know them. If he hasn't answered that question yet, he won't because he is making it all up. 3 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jmccr8 Posted August 27, 2022 #973 Share Posted August 27, 2022 (edited) On 8/25/2022 at 10:07 PM, larryp said: YHWH I know you think it's impossible for YHWH to part the Red Sea, feed five thousand with only five loaves and two fish, and he definitely couldn't cause the eath to tilt on its axial at 23.5 degrees every year, just like clockwork, which provides us with four seasons. LOL, take your head out of the sand, man. Hi Larry Yes, absolutely correct he couldn’t do that. Where I live there is no sand so not likely my head is buried in it. May I suggest visiting a professional like Dr. Inur Butt phd that specializes in proctlogical thinking , he is at the forefront of science leading to the way of interpretive asstrolgogical premises specifically regarding social impacting of asinine guppies into mainstream delusions Edited August 27, 2022 by jmccr8 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lightly Posted August 27, 2022 #974 Share Posted August 27, 2022 (edited) On 8/26/2022 at 12:07 AM, larryp said: YHWH I know you think it's impossible for YHWH to part the Red Sea, feed five thousand with only five loaves and two fish, and he definitely couldn't cause the eath to tilt on its axial at 23.5 degrees every year, just like clockwork, which provides us with four seasons. LOL, take your head out of the sand, man. Matthew 8:1-5 «He asked them, «How many loaves do you have?» And they said «Seven» but, I too find all of creation ,including the four seasons, rather miraculous!* somehow Edited August 27, 2022 by lightly 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
newbloodmoon Posted August 27, 2022 #975 Share Posted August 27, 2022 Just so everyone is clear, by me posting this GIF doesn’t make the fish and loaves story true. 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now