Eldorado Posted August 24, 2022 #1 Share Posted August 24, 2022 (edited) An eerie figure believed to be the ghost of a woman has been caught on camera at a historic coastal graveyard. Mandy Steel, a cleaner from Sunderland in Tyne and Wear, had travelled with her two adult children on Saturday, August 13 to Tynemouth Priory in North Tyneside, where she decided to take photos of the ruins. But it was not until later when the 45-year-old returned home and looked at her pictures that she said she spotted a ghostly figure of a woman in old-fashioned clothing standing behind a family. Photo: UK Mail Ms Steel added: 'It's really odd because my daughter was also taking photos of the same place at the same time, but her phone didn't pick anything up. LAD Bible Edited August 24, 2022 by Eldorado 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jethrofloyd Posted August 24, 2022 #2 Share Posted August 24, 2022 It's just a real woman. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orphalesion Posted August 24, 2022 #3 Share Posted August 24, 2022 Yeah she's not even wearing "old fashioned" clothing, I'd say. It can just be interpreted that way due to the distance and her being silhouetted against the sky. To me it just looks like a woman wearing an ordinary hat and long coat, just like some people do today when the weather is cool and there might be rain coming. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
papageorge1 Posted August 24, 2022 #4 Share Posted August 24, 2022 Papameter Reading 75% Paranormal 15% Natural (real person) 10% Hoax Factor: Looks like from a past generation 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the13bats Posted August 24, 2022 #5 Share Posted August 24, 2022 I guess this lady never heard of a photo bomb ( accidental ) The story says daughter took a pic same time same place with no ghost lady but thats meaningless, and she said she looked thru her days pics and didnt see that same hat...no, people never remove a hat, this is like a couple people already said, a real women not a ghost. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HollyDolly Posted August 24, 2022 #6 Share Posted August 24, 2022 I looked at the photo. If you scroll down the article, you see another photo with the woman standing, but also some other people as well. I just think it's a visitor. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moonman Posted August 24, 2022 #7 Share Posted August 24, 2022 (edited) She's literally with a group of people that were known to be there. Photographer is a complete idiot making such stupid claims. "Oh, I didn't notice that one person way off in the distance slightly apart from all those other people way off in the distance, must be a GhOsT since I keep specific location tabs on every single person I see at all times, especially while I'm absentmindedly snapping pictures of cluttered landscapes! Better call the daily rag and make some money!" Surprised the moron didn't try to say all of them were "ghosts". Edited August 24, 2022 by moonman 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jethrofloyd Posted August 24, 2022 #8 Share Posted August 24, 2022 A poor woman can now be offended and angry if she is declared a ghost. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stereologist Posted August 24, 2022 #9 Share Posted August 24, 2022 New and improved papameter 100% real woman 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
acute Posted August 24, 2022 #10 Share Posted August 24, 2022 1 hour ago, jethrofloyd said: A poor woman can now be offended and angry if she is declared a ghost. What if she identifies as a ghost? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moonman Posted August 24, 2022 #11 Share Posted August 24, 2022 (edited) How to take a ghost picture: 1. Take photo of public space with people in picture 2. Claim people photographed were not there when picture was taken 3. Send picture captioned "ghost" to daily rag 4. Profit and fool idiots with no critical thinking skills 5. Get laughed at by non-morons Edited August 24, 2022 by moonman 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThereWeAreThen Posted August 24, 2022 #12 Share Posted August 24, 2022 7 hours ago, papageorge1 said: Papameter Reading 75% Paranormal 15% Natural (real person) 10% Hoax Factor: Looks like from a past generation You do realise elderly people still wear old clothes right? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SecretSanta Posted August 24, 2022 #13 Share Posted August 24, 2022 7 hours ago, papageorge1 said: Papameter Reading 75% Paranormal 15% Natural (real person) 10% Hoax Factor: Looks like from a past generation There not enough detail in the clothing to say when it’s from. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
papageorge1 Posted August 24, 2022 #14 Share Posted August 24, 2022 38 minutes ago, ThereWeAreThen said: You do realise elderly people still wear old clothes right? Certainly something I considered in the reading. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
papageorge1 Posted August 24, 2022 #15 Share Posted August 24, 2022 16 minutes ago, SecretSanta said: There not enough detail in the clothing to say when it’s from. True, it suggests the 1940[s to 1950's to me but the stronger evidence is the claim that no one was there that looked like that. And I know no one's testimony is perfect, so I left in undecided and gave a percentage. My reading allows for the possibility of a living person too. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stereologist Posted August 24, 2022 #16 Share Posted August 24, 2022 The new and improved papameter still says 100% real woman Funny how some people try to pretend that the normal is paranormal. That must be due to the simple fact that no one can ever demonstrate that anything is paranormal. The fall back is to claim the prosaic is something other than what it actually is. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MGB Posted August 24, 2022 #17 Share Posted August 24, 2022 Lame. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThereWeAreThen Posted August 24, 2022 #18 Share Posted August 24, 2022 1 hour ago, MGB said: Lame. About 95% of these stories are. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Black Red Devil Posted August 24, 2022 #19 Share Posted August 24, 2022 Looks like the Queen. She still goes around in cloths from the 1940's. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the13bats Posted August 25, 2022 #20 Share Posted August 25, 2022 8 hours ago, papageorge1 said: True, it suggests the 1940[s to 1950's to me but the stronger evidence is the claim that no one was there that looked like that. And I know no one's testimony is perfect, so I left in undecided and gave a percentage. My reading allows for the possibility of a living person too. Quote I checked my full lot of photos to see if anyone was dressed like that but no one was wearing a hat. Well there we have it as we know people never remove a hat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the13bats Posted August 25, 2022 #21 Share Posted August 25, 2022 9 hours ago, moonman said: How to take a ghost picture: 1. Take photo of public space with people in picture 2. Claim people photographed were not there when picture was taken 3. Send picture captioned "ghost" to daily rag 4. Profit and fool idiots with no critical thinking skills 5. Get laughed at by non-morons Yep, so pretty much any pic of a person could be claimed to be a ghost and get a 75% paranormal on some asinine meter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
openozy Posted August 25, 2022 #22 Share Posted August 25, 2022 4 hours ago, Black Red Devil said: Looks like the Queen. She still goes around in cloths from the 1940's. It really does, lol. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
openozy Posted August 25, 2022 #23 Share Posted August 25, 2022 9 hours ago, moonman said: How to take a ghost picture: 1. Take photo of public space with people in picture 2. Claim people photographed were not there when picture was taken 3. Send picture captioned "ghost" to daily rag 4. Profit and fool idiots with no critical thinking skills 5. Get laughed at by non-morons You'd have to be a moron to believe anything paranormal can be captured on film. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SecretSanta Posted August 25, 2022 #24 Share Posted August 25, 2022 9 hours ago, papageorge1 said: True, it suggests the 1940[s to 1950's to me but the stronger evidence is the claim that no one was there that looked like that. And I know no one's testimony is perfect, so I left in undecided and gave a percentage. My reading allows for the possibility of a living person too. She didn’t even notice the figure until later so she wasn’t looking for someone that looked like that while she was there. When you’re out in public do you recall what everyone was wearing? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SecretSanta Posted August 25, 2022 #25 Share Posted August 25, 2022 In this photo it actually looks like 2 people. The person in the hat and a younger/shorter person next to him/her. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now