Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -

One-legged Stone Age skeleton may show oldest amputation


Still Waters

Recommended Posts

 
46 minutes ago, Still Waters said:

The prehistoric surgery could show that humans were making medical advances much earlier than previously thought,

They also knew everything about use of the anesthesia.

Funny Medical Caveman Anesthesiologist Cartoon Art" Photographic Print for  Sale by abbottoons | Redbubble

  • Haha 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/7/2022 at 9:26 PM, docyabut2 said:

Could it mean that  skeleton was born that way ?

 

no it could not

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I highly doubt it was "surgical" - unless you call getting your leg chopped off by someone trying to kill you "surgical".

Some weird sacrificial limb thing or an attack I would guess.

Edited by moonman
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The term is from Ancient Greek φώκη phōkē, "seal (animal)" + -o- interfix + μέλος melos, "limb" + English suffix -ia). Phocomelia is an extremely rare congenital disorder involving malformation of the limbs (dysmelia). Étienne Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire coined the term in 1836.[1]

 from genetic inheritance.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phocomelia

Edited by docyabut2
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We don’t know what the original injury was to start with , that said humans have been carving up meat for a long time even with bone tools so it is not surprising that someone took a chance on what they knew and it worked. Maybe when a child it was mauled or broken in a fall and had gang green set in. Humans observe things and learn from them and isolated incidents of constructive thinking in earlier archaic humans is worth study. We have no idea what humans in their time’s knew but there is sufficient evidence of archaic humans caring for others that are disabled 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
28 minutes ago, Tatetopa said:

I believe the article describes cut marks and several years worth of healing as a teen.  

I understand the cut marks and the years of healing.

I also understand that the 'surgery' most probably wasn't a nice event.

So yes, it wasn't a birth defect.

But no doubt some people were born that way back then, like they still are.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Abramelin said:

But no doubt some people were born that way back then, like they still are.

One would assume so. It would be rare good fortune indeed for us to find such a skeleton buried with some love or reverence.  It seems as likely to me that these early people did the same thing as our early Greek ancestors, expose infants that could not survive .  I don't mean to imply the Greeks were the only ones doing that, just an example. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Abramelin said:

I'm glad to say those Greeks weren't MY ancestors.

Speaking of Greeks, maybe Herodotus was right about those one-eyed one -legged humans hopping around in terra incognita.  (Opps, mixed metaphor, I don't know Greek for unknown lands.)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.