Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -

Has the Loch Ness Monster moved to North Carolina?


Commander CMG
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Bizarre footage showed the huge beast pop its head out water off Atlantic Beach
  • Witnesses left horrified by the animal, with some asking if it's Loch Ness Monster
  • But others claimed that it could have been a baby whale, an eel or an alligator

This is the ominous moment a giant snake-like creature surfaced in a North Carolina port - with some claiming it looks like the Loch Ness Monster.

Bizarre footage showed the huge beast pop its head out the water off Atlantic Beach before its body breached and it dipped back underwater.

Witnesses were left horrified what the animal was, with some questioning if it was the mythical Scottish monster and others claiming it was a baby whale or a gator.

Source

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Awesome.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Commander CMG said:
  • Bizarre footage showed the huge beast pop its head out water off Atlantic Beach
  • Witnesses left horrified by the animal, with some asking if it's Loch Ness Monster
  • But others claimed that it could have been a baby whale, an eel or an alligator

This is the ominous moment a giant snake-like creature surfaced in a North Carolina port - with some claiming it looks like the Loch Ness Monster.

Bizarre footage showed the huge beast pop its head out the water off Atlantic Beach before its body breached and it dipped back underwater.

Witnesses were left horrified what the animal was, with some questioning if it was the mythical Scottish monster and others claiming it was a baby whale or a gator.

Source

This is likely a nonsense report, but sea serpents exist, whether they are the Loch Ness Monster or not is debateable: Oarfish: harmless fish or deadly sea serpent? - National Maritime Historical Society (seahistory.org)

There are reports that the 'Nessie' stuff is just to generate tourism, but there are also more authentic reports.Loch Ness monster 'might be real' after scientists make 'surprising' discovery - CBBC Newsround

Edited by pellinore
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Amanda Evans said:

This is certainly intriguing 

It looks serpentine for sure 

…yes but it’s movement seems to be up and down like a dolphin as opposed to a sideways alligator, snake or eel. But it has no dorsal fins and makes a lot of bubbles which suggests it can easily breathe on land. No enough footage to call it either way

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's very obviously a seal in the video

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Commander CMG said:
  • Bizarre footage showed the huge beast pop its head out water off Atlantic Beach
  • Witnesses left horrified by the animal, with some asking if it's Loch Ness Monster
  • But others claimed that it could have been a baby whale, an eel or an alligator

This is the ominous moment a giant snake-like creature surfaced in a North Carolina port - with some claiming it looks like the Loch Ness Monster.

Bizarre footage showed the huge beast pop its head out the water off Atlantic Beach before its body breached and it dipped back underwater.

Witnesses were left horrified what the animal was, with some questioning if it was the mythical Scottish monster and others claiming it was a baby whale or a gator.

Source 

5 hours ago, Commander CMG said:
  • Bizarre footage showed the huge beast pop its head out water off Atlantic Beach
  • Witnesses left horrified by the animal, with some asking if it's Loch Ness Monster
  • But others claimed that it could have been a baby whale, an eel or an alligator

This is the ominous moment a giant snake-like creature surfaced in a North Carolina port - with some claiming it looks like the Loch Ness Monster.

Bizarre footage showed the huge beast pop its head out the water off Atlantic Beach before its body breached and it dipped back underwater.

Witnesses were left horrified what the animal was, with some questioning if it was the mythical Scottish monster and others claiming it was a baby whale or a gator.

Source

 

Hey my brother, that’s not Nessie Ha!. It’s a Whale don’t know the exact species but it’s certainly and the only that the source said that’s accurate is that you don’t see things like that every day. That’s true because they don’t come that close to inhabited ares normally, but there are 8 species of Whales that pass North Carolina waters during migrations.

This photo taken off the coast of North Carolina it’s a mother Whale with a calf. Looks pretty similar doesn’t it!

Take care my brother great thread!

29C13B23-9801-4AB5-B282-6C7B01F19B11.thumb.jpeg.b016ea09303350c98718a9363b9d6b87.jpeg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It isn't a huge creature, for a start. It's just an ordinary swimming snake. :hmm:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Nessie is not serpentine. He/she is more plesiosaur type, so it couldn't have been Nessie. And there really is no way out of the River Ness when you think about it. My guess is there is a very large eel or snake in North Carolina. 

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly who can really say what the Loch Ness Monster looks like?  Is anyone on a first name basis with the Loch Ness Monster?  Selfies as proof plz.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, jasmin_13 said:

Nessie is not serpentine. He/she is more plesiosaur type, so it couldn't have been Nessie. And there really is no way out of the River Ness when you think about it. My guess is there is a very large eel or snake in North Carolina. 

You might want to go look up the zillion reasons why nessis isnt a plesiosaur type creature.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Alchopwn said:

Honestly who can really say what the Loch Ness Monster looks like?  Is anyone on a first name basis with the Loch Ness Monster?  Selfies as proof plz.

 

28 minutes ago, the13bats said:

You might want to go look up the zillion reasons why nessis isnt a plesiosaur type creature.

I'm only saying that because of the descriptions that so many tourists and others have given of Nessie. It's always a match with the Plesiosaurs. And I've seen it many times, but I'm keeping that to myself. The author of this topic described the creature in North Carolina as being serpentine. 

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
48 minutes ago, jasmin_13 said:

 

I'm only saying that because of the descriptions that so many tourists and others have given of Nessie. It's always a match with the Plesiosaurs. And I've seen it many times, but I'm keeping that to myself. The author of this topic described the creature in North Carolina as being serpentine. 

 

50 minutes ago, jasmin_13 said:

I've seen it many times, but I'm keeping that to myself.

No you are not you just mentioned it.

People see what they want to see, I dont know what you saw or didnt see i wasnt there but its been well proven beyond debate that its not a plesiosaur, that whole farse about a long neck dino was a hoax started with the surgeons photo, havent you researched any of this?

The sightings in ness are many different things, ranging from waves to imagination to delusional to hoaxes and known creatures like eels and the wells catfish.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, the13bats said:

 

No you are not you just mentioned it.

People see what they want to see, I dont know what you saw or didnt see i wasnt there but its been well proven beyond debate that its not a plesiosaur, that whole farse about a long neck dino was a hoax started with the surgeons photo, havent you researched any of this?

The sightings in ness are many different things, ranging from waves to imagination to delusional to hoaxes and known creatures like eels and the wells catfish.

Lol. Silly. :D

  • Haha 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Alchopwn said:

Honestly who can really say what the Loch Ness Monster looks like?  Is anyone on a first name basis with the Loch Ness Monster?  Selfies as proof plz.

I actually met Messy once, I had a large bowl of Wild Mushroom Stew and then I went fishing. I got a little bite set the hook, and reeled in my catch, well it was Messy. She was really cool and after I removed the hook she said thanks mate I am very plesiosaur to meet you!:lol:

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Grim Reaper 6 said:

I actually met Messy once, I had a large bowl of Wild Mushroom Stew and then I went fishing. I got a little bite set the hook, and reeled in my catch, well it was Messy. She was really cool and after I removed the hook she said thanks mate I am very plesiosaur to meet you!:lol:

A trophy for, something. Lol. 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, jasmin_13 said:

A trophy for, something. Lol. 

Yes it certainly was, hope all is well!:tu:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, jasmin_13 said:

 It's always a match with the Plesiosaurs.

'Nessie' has been seen both in the water, and on the land. Whatever it is, it must be an amfibie animal. The amfibie animals live both in the water, and on the land. The frogs, toads, flatworms, salamanders....are examples of the amfibie animals. I believe the 'Loch Ness' monster may be the large salamander.

 
 
 
 

 

 

 

has been seen both in water and on land.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, flying squid said:

'Nessie' has been seen both in the water, and on the land. Whatever it is, it must be an amfibie animal. The amfibie animals live both in the water, and on the land. The frogs, toads, flatworms, salamanders....are examples of the amfibie animals. I believe the 'Loch Ness' monster may be the large salamander.

 
 
 
 

 

 

 

has been seen both in water and on land.

Seen? Do we have,any evidence at all to support claims it was on land?

The only people who make claims nessie is a Plesiosaur are those who have basically no knowledge of the Plesiosaurs, it couldnt lumber out on land and couldnt hold its head and neck up out of the water it simply wasnt built that way in addition it was an air breather it would be popping up turtle style to get a breathe a lot,

A large salamander? Maybe but we would still need a breeding population and we dont seem to have that.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, the13bats said:

Seen? Do we have,any evidence at all to support claims it was on land?

Just a couple of quick examples of the Loch Ness monster on the land:

''The fact that ‘Nessie’ occasionally appeared on land was not fully known about by the wider public until 1933. That year on 22nd of July it was spotted by Mr and Mrs George Spicer, a London couple returning from a Scottish holiday.

They were travelling along the Dores to Foyers road when 200 yards in front of them they noticed an unusual grey object crossing the road. First they saw what appeared to be a trunk like object, which was then followed by a large body. Mr Spicer later claimed it looked like a “scenic railway.” The couple realised that whatever it was it was a living being, and watched in fascinated horror as it jerked across the road and vanished into the water. The vegetation the creature had passed through was flattened; locals later stated that large patches of crushed bracken and weeds were commonly associated with the monster.

The Spicer’s sighting was met with both fascination and ridicule. It was one thing to have the monster appear in the water, but quite another for it to be crossing the road!.''

https://www.historic-uk.com/HistoryUK/HistoryofScotland/Loch-Ness-Monster-Sightings-On-Land/

  • Like 2
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is some creature, what it is, is unknown. The sad case recently when the best experts failed to find a body in the River Wyre shows that modern science is fallible. It is probably a creature left from the Jurassic period. 

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, flying squid said:

Just a couple of quick examples of the Loch Ness monster on the land:

''The fact that ‘Nessie’ occasionally appeared on land was not fully known about by the wider public until 1933. That year on 22nd of July it was spotted by Mr and Mrs George Spicer, a London couple returning from a Scottish holiday.

They were travelling along the Dores to Foyers road when 200 yards in front of them they noticed an unusual grey object crossing the road. First they saw what appeared to be a trunk like object, which was then followed by a large body. Mr Spicer later claimed it looked like a “scenic railway.” The couple realised that whatever it was it was a living being, and watched in fascinated horror as it jerked across the road and vanished into the water. The vegetation the creature had passed through was flattened; locals later stated that large patches of crushed bracken and weeds were commonly associated with the monster.

The Spicer’s sighting was met with both fascination and ridicule. It was one thing to have the monster appear in the water, but quite another for it to be crossing the road!.''

https://www.historic-uk.com/HistoryUK/HistoryofScotland/Loch-Ness-Monster-Sightings-On-Land/

Stories are fun but not evidence in these such cases, im not saying these people didnt see anything but im not using tgeir stiries,as evidence some unknown creature lives in the loch.

2 hours ago, pellinore said:

There is some creature, what it is, is unknown. The sad case recently when the best experts failed to find a body in the River Wyre shows that modern science is fallible. It is probably a creature left from the Jurassic period. 

We have creatures like that but they do need a few conditions to survive, food, habitats breeding population, we have nothing in the loch like that it couldnt hide it would seen 1000s go there cameras in hand we would have whole galleries full for crisp clear pictures and we dont, we have crap blurry messes and stories, the claims fall short.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 1/7/2023 at 9:20 PM, ouija ouija said:

It isn't a huge creature, for a start. It's just an ordinary swimming snake. :hmm:

Snakes swim the same way they move on land, laterally (side to side). This isn’t a snake.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.