el midgetron Posted January 19 #1 Share Posted January 19 VERNON JONES, A FORMER Democratic state representative-turned Trump Republican, has been ordered by a federal judge to pay $45,000 to a man he blocked on Facebook, according to The Atlanta Journal-Constitution. Jones blocked Tomas Miko, a DeKalb County resident from Georgia, from his social media page after they swapped political opinions online in March 2020 while Jones was serving in the state legislature. After the testy exchange, which the outlet says included comments on proposed immigration legislation sponsored by the former state lawmaker, Jones deleted Miko’s contrary posts. A few months later, Miko filed a federal lawsuit against Jones, alleging Jones deleted his comments to silence his criticism. U.S. District Judge Steven Grimberg stated that when public figures block constituents from their social media profiles to stop them from expressing conflicting opinions, that constitutes “viewpoint discrimination.” The judge also found that Miko’s claims were enough to prove liability and issued a judgement against Jones, who did not respond to the lawsuit. Miko was awarded $8000 in compensatory damages on Tuesday, which Grimberg said “is sufficent to deter Jones and other public officials from engaging in similar misconduct.” Jones was also ordered to pay $37,652 in costs and legal fees to Miko’s attorneys. https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/vernon-jones-ordered-pay-45000-facebook-blocking-man-1234662741/ 1 Top Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+and-then Posted January 19 #2 Share Posted January 19 Free speech doesn't seem to appeal to those on the Left, nearly as much as it once did. Shouting down opposing opinions is the sign of weak minds with weak arguments and DC seems to be onboard with this movement. The potentially negative thing about refusing to allow speech you disagree with is that it never really disappears... it just operates under the radar until some critical mass is achieved. NO American should want to silence others for disagreeing. 1 Top Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gromdor Posted January 19 #3 Share Posted January 19 So you agree with the judge that blocking someone is denying them free speech? 1 Top Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the13bats Posted January 19 #4 Share Posted January 19 2 hours ago, Gromdor said: So you agree with the judge that blocking someone is denying them free speech? This is a complicated situation we will be seeing more and more of. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now