Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -

Pro-Trump Former Lawmaker Ordered to Pay $45,000 for Blocking Man on Facebook


el midgetron

Recommended Posts

VERNON JONES, A FORMER Democratic state representative-turned Trump Republican, has been ordered by a federal judge to pay $45,000 to a man he blocked on Facebook, according to The Atlanta Journal-Constitution.

Jones blocked Tomas Miko, a DeKalb County resident from Georgia, from his social media page after they swapped political opinions online in March 2020 while Jones was serving in the state legislature.

After the testy exchange, which the outlet says included comments on proposed immigration legislation sponsored by the former state lawmaker, Jones deleted Miko’s contrary posts.

A few months later, Miko filed a federal lawsuit against Jones, alleging Jones deleted his comments to silence his criticism. U.S. District Judge Steven Grimberg stated that when public figures block constituents from their social media profiles to stop them from expressing conflicting opinions, that constitutes “viewpoint discrimination.” The judge also found that Miko’s claims were enough to prove liability and issued a judgement against Jones, who did not respond to the lawsuit.

Miko was awarded $8000 in compensatory damages on Tuesday, which Grimberg said “is sufficent to deter Jones and other public officials from engaging in similar misconduct.” Jones was also ordered to pay $37,652 in costs and legal fees to Miko’s attorneys.

https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/vernon-jones-ordered-pay-45000-facebook-blocking-man-1234662741/

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Free speech doesn't seem to appeal to those on the Left, nearly as much as it once did.  Shouting down opposing opinions is the sign of weak minds with weak arguments and DC seems to be onboard with this movement.  The potentially negative thing about refusing to allow speech you disagree with is that it never really disappears... it just operates under the radar until some critical mass is achieved.  NO American should want to silence others for disagreeing.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Gromdor said:

So you agree with the judge that blocking someone is denying them free speech?

This is a complicated situation we will be seeing more and more of.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.