Hunter Biden threatened to withhold cash-strapped assistant's pay if she didn't FaceTime him naked

[el midgetron]

Hunter Biden threatened one of his cash-strapped young female staffers with withholding her pay if she didn't FaceTime him for sex.

Shocking texts between the President's son, 52, and his young assistant, who was 29 at the time, show Hunter asking for video sex sessions and sending her cash via Apple Pay after she pleaded that she was struggling to make rent.

The woman, who DailyMail.com has chosen not to identify, worked as an assistant at Hunter's law firm, Owasco, in 2018 and 2019. She is the fourth employee he is known to have had a sexual relationship with….

….Days later he texted her saying he would pay her but that she had to video chat with him.

'I will [m]ake up for back pay. You have to make up for back work. By FTiming me and/or going to our next-club party,' Hunter wrote to his young employee.

'When can you face time? If we FT the rule has to be no talk of anything but sex and we must be naked and we have to do whatever the other person asks within reason.'

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11625173/Hunter-Biden-threatened-female-assistant-withholding-pay-didnt-FaceTime-sex.html

 

[+OverSword]

Dude is a piece of work.  And also the smartest man Joe Biden knows   Which is probably true

Edited January 31, 2023 by OverSword

[spartan max2]

Jesus christ

[tcgram]

Ew, gross.   

[the13bats]

Well then i do hope evidence is gathered and charges are brought up, the dailymail is an upstanding outlet perhaps they could assist these abused women get hunter prosecuted.

 

[+DanL]

If that was my daughter I would tell her to invite him over and then after she let him in go to her bedroom and let me "TALK" to him.

[Gromdor]

Phew, I'm glad we dodged a bullet by not electing him President!

To think there are perverts out there that pay for sex- and hush money to cover it up.

Takes a real low values person to vote for the likes of that!

[+DanL]

We elected his father and you know the old saying that the acorn doesn't fall far from the tree.

[+Link of Hyrule]

27 minutes ago, Gromdor said:

Phew, I'm glad we dodged a bullet by not electing him President!

To think there are perverts out there that pay for sex- and hush money to cover it up.

Takes a real low values person to vote for the likes of that!

The "paying for sex" thing isn't the real issue. It's the "withholding legally earned funds from an employee until they acquiesce to your demands" thing that is of real concern. 

I don't really care if someone pays for sex, or hush money to cover it up. Prostitution is literally one of the oldest professions in the history of humanity. What I DO care about is consent! It's not possible to consent to sex when you are literally having your money stolen from you until you do (even if Hunter throws in some extra money on top of what she's owed for her services, it doesn't suddenly become a consensual act). 

There's a scene in A Song of Ice and Fire series (Game of Thrones), I'm pretty sure it's the fourth book, in which Ser Gregor Clegane (The Mountain) rapes a barmaid while her dad is forced to watch, then tosses the dad a coin and says he's paid for the sex (IIRC, he said he paid too much for it and demands the father give him change from the coin he tossed) - it didn't make it into the tv show, and though it's been years since I've read it, I have never forgotten the scene. Gregor could get away with it because Game of Thrones doesn't have rape laws. This situation is fundamentally the same (if true, there's always the possibility that she's lying about this) - it's non-consensual sex. And comparing consensual prostitution with rape is pretty gross, in my opinion. 

Edited February 1, 2023 by Paranoid Android

[psyche101]

24 minutes ago, DanL said:

We elected his father and you know the old saying that the acorn doesn't fall far from the tree.

Hadn't he fallen as far as he could?

He won't ever see the white house. If this is proven true all he will see is a jail house isn't it? 

He will never get as far as his father did. Not going by this. 

[psyche101]

2 minutes ago, Paranoid Android said:

The "paying for sex" thing isn't the real issue. It's the "withholding legally earned funds from an employee until they acquiesce to your demands" thing that is of real concern. 

I don't really care if someone pays for sex, or hush money to cover it up. Prostitution is literally one of the oldest professions in the history of humanity. What I DO care about is consent! It's not possible to consent to sex when you are literally having your money stolen from you until you do (even if Hunter throws in some extra money on top of what she's owed for her services, it doesn't suddenly become a consensual act). 

There's a scene in A Song of Ice and Fire (Game of Thrones), I'm pretty sure it's the fourth book, in which Ser Gregor Clegane (The Mountain) rapes a barmaid while her dad is forced to watch, then tosses the dad a coin and says he's paid for the sex (he actually says he paid too much for it and demands the father give him change for the coin he tossed) - it didn't make it into the tv show, but I have never forgotten the scene. Gregor could get away with it because Game of Thrones doesn't have rape laws. This situation is fundamentally the same (if true, there's always the possibility that she's lying about this) - it's non-consensual sex. And comparing consensual prostitution with rape is pretty gross, in my opinion. 

 

 

Do you consider grabbing married women on the privates, because you believe you can, consensual?

[Golden Duck]

38 minutes ago, DanL said:

We elected his father and you know the old saying that the acorn doesn't fall far from the tree.

Thanks Jong.  Your opinion is noted. 

Those of us outside DPRK don't agree Joe is guilty of rape, because Hunter may be.

[Michelle]

But, whatabout...whatabout...whatabout....TRUMP?

[the13bats]

29 minutes ago, Gromdor said:

Phew, I'm glad we dodged a bullet by not electing him President!

To think there are perverts out there that pay for sex- and hush money to cover it up.

Takes a real low values person to vote for the likes of that!

 

26 minutes ago, DanL said:

We elected his father and you know the old saying that the acorn doesn't fall far from the tree.

Well then do BOMs sons pay hush money to sex trade workers they have affairs with, i mean if nuts dont fall far from tree i guess they do.

Its a bit ironic BOM is far more like hunter than hunters own dad is.

[+Link of Hyrule]

18 minutes ago, psyche101 said:

 

 

Do you consider grabbing married women on the privates, because you believe you can, consensual?

If they consent to it, then it's consensual. If they don't, then it's not. Though you are referring to the Trump secret recordings, do you think everything someone says in a private recording should be held as fact? Genuine question, some people have argued that Trump was just boasting or talking like one the boys (locker room talk, is one phrase I've heard used to describe it). If it's just locker room talk, then it's an idle boast, it's not actually based in any fact. And like many idle boasts, they rarely have truth to back them up (when I used to hang out at the pub, the number of people who would boast about stuff that clearly never happened was phenomenal). 

Where do you sit in terms of boasts in private recordings? 

[the13bats]

40 minutes ago, psyche101 said:

 

 

Do you consider grabbing married women on the privates, because you believe you can, consensual?

All BOM subjects here who i asked if they had an expecting daughter and sil cheated on her will sex trade workers and paid them gift money to hush them up, none of the BOM supporters who did reply to me said they saw no issues with it.

Edited February 1, 2023 by the13bats

[psyche101]

22 minutes ago, Paranoid Android said:

If they consent to it, then it's consensual. If they don't, then it's not. Though you are referring to the Trump secret recordings, do you think everything someone says in a private recording should be held as fact? Genuine question, some people have argued that Trump was just boasting or talking like one the boys (locker room talk, is one phrase I've heard used to describe it). If it's just locker room talk, then it's an idle boast, it's not actually based in any fact. And like many idle boasts, they rarely have truth to back them up (when I used to hang out at the pub, the number of people who would boast about stuff that clearly never happened was phenomenal). 

Where do you sit in terms of boasts in private recordings? 

I didn't ask you about any of that 

Grabbing married women on the privates clearly isn't consensual. If you or I did that on the street we would be charged with assault yes? 

Do you think that is ok? That is what I'm asking. 

The rest is handwaving away terrible behaviour, but being a nice guy I will indulge you. 

Locker room talk is a deranged way of brushing what is assault under the rug. Private or not, if a violation is exposed, it exists and doesn't affect that the act happened. 

[+Link of Hyrule]

7 minutes ago, psyche101 said:

I didn't ask you about any of that 

Grabbing married women on the privates clearly isn't consensual. If you or I did that on the street we would be charged with assault yes? 

Do you think that is ok? That is what I'm asking. 

The rest is handwaving away terrible behaviour, but being a nice guy I will indulge you. 

Locker room talk is a deranged way of brushing what is assault under the rug. Private or not, if a violation is exposed, it exists and doesn't affect that the act happened. 

This thread is about Hunter Biden, as you seem to just want to argue about Trump, I choose not to answer your question! Alternatively, you could answer my question - do you think a secret recording is evidence that what the person said is true? 

Edited February 1, 2023 by Paranoid Android

[psyche101]

8 minutes ago, Paranoid Android said:

This thread is about Hunter Biden, as you seem to just want to argue about Trump,

I didn't bring it up. You brought in the paying for sex thing. 

I asked you a question about your post remember? 

8 minutes ago, Paranoid Android said:

I choose not to answer your question!

That comes as no surprise I'm sorry to say. 

Says a lot by saying nothing. 

8 minutes ago, Paranoid Android said:

Alternatively, you could answer my question - do you think a secret recording is evidence that what the person said is true? 

Of course. If a person is clearly identified what does the manner of recording have to do with it? 

[+Link of Hyrule]

9 minutes ago, psyche101 said:

I didn't bring it up. You brought in the paying for sex thing. 

I asked you a question about your post remember? 

You brought up a hypothetical example that just so happens to mirror a specific incident involving Donald Trump boasting! Don't lie and pretend that this isn't about trying to bring Donald Trump into this! 

 

9 minutes ago, psyche101 said:

Of course. If a person is clearly identified what does the manner of recording have to do with it? 

I'll remember you said that. 

Edited February 1, 2023 by Paranoid Android

[psyche101]

1 minute ago, Paranoid Android said:

You brought up a hypothetical example that just so happens to mirror a specific incident involving Donald Trump boasting! Don't lie and pretend that this isn't about trying to bring Donald Trump into this! 

Go back and read the posts 

You brought Trump into this. Post #9.

1 minute ago, Paranoid Android said:

I'll remember you said that. It should come in handy one day. 

Go right ahead

Are you seriously trying to say it wasn't Trump? He admitted to it and offered a Clinton whataboutism.

[+Link of Hyrule]

52 minutes ago, psyche101 said:

Go back and read the posts 

You brought Trump into this. Post #9.

You brought up an example that just happened to be an example that Donald Trump was recorded saying. Your are being dishonest pretending you didn't want Trump's name in this,  you brought it up knowing exactly what would happen, and now playing innocent when you got called out on it!

Your disingenuity knows no bounds!

52 minutes ago, psyche101 said:

Go right ahead

Are you seriously trying to say it wasn't Trump? He admitted to it and offered a Clinton whataboutism.

Not what I'm saying at all.  I'm not putting doubt on who said it. 

Edited February 1, 2023 by Paranoid Android

[psyche101]

18 minutes ago, Paranoid Android said:

You brought up an example that just happened to be an example that Donald Trump was recorded saying. Your are being dishonest pretending you didn't want Trump's name in this,  you brought it up knowing exactly what would happen, and now playing innocent when you got called out on it!

Get real 

You brought up Trump cheating on his wife with a porn star hooker. Post nine. You appear to condone it. You got called out and don't like it. 

You didn't have to. If the text is proven hunter has no defence. He should go to jail. 

18 minutes ago, Paranoid Android said:

Your disingenuity knows no bounds!

I'm not the one defending a known cheater. I feel your hypocrisy is where boundaries disappear. It just goes on forever. 

18 minutes ago, Paranoid Android said:

Not what I'm saying at all.  I'm not putting doubt on who said it. 

Then there's nothing to add really is there. He said it, it's utterly disgusting and it shows what regard he holds other people in. Lecherous creep. Case closed. 

Edited February 1, 2023 by psyche101

[+Link of Hyrule]

27 minutes ago, psyche101 said:

Get real 

You brought up Trump cheating on his wife with a porn star hooker. Post nine. You appear to condone it. You got called out and don't like it. 

You didn't have to. If the text is proven hunter has no defence. He should go to jail. 

1- I didn't mention Trump in post #9! The first time I mentioned Trump was in post #15, in reply to you!

2- I was replying to @Gromdor, from post #7, who (like you) seemed to try to bring Trump into it (also without using Trump's name). Gromdor's issue happened to be comparing an alleged rape to consensual prostitution, I think it's very fair to point out how they are not the same thing! I was able to reply to Gromdor without bringing Trump's name into it, just like he did, unfortunately I wasn't able to do it for your post as your post required more nuance, as you are stating a quote from a secret recording of Trump, not an allegation from a woman or a report from a police incident. 

Do you not agree that comparing consensual prostitution to rape is gross? There's an objective difference between them, right? 

27 minutes ago, psyche101 said:

I'm not the one defending a known cheater. I feel your hypocrisy is where boundaries disappear. It just goes on forever. 

Then there's nothing to add really is there. He said it, it's utterly disgusting and it shows what regard he holds other people in. Lecherous creep. Case closed. 

Being a cheater might be frowned upon, but it's not illegal. Grabbing someone by the privates without their consent IS illegal, though it's interesting that no women have come forward to claim that Trump went and grabbed their privates without consent. Which suggests either 1- Trump is boasting and there is no truth to what he said, or 2- he was right and women really do let rich people like Trump grab them by the privates (which is consensual)! Without people coming forward, it's a non-issue to me! If Hunter Biden boasted that he could grab women by the privates as a rich person I'd also assume he was just using locker room talk, unless someone came forward to allege something, precisely like this woman did! 

If the allegations are true I hope Hunter Biden goes to prison for a very long time. 

Edited February 1, 2023 by Paranoid Android

[Grim Reaper 6]

8 hours ago, spartan max2 said:

Jesus christ

Super Star