Georgia grand jury in Trump interference probe found no fraud in 2020 election

[+Grim Reaper 6]

The partial release of a Georgia grand jury report evaluating former President Trump’s election interference in the state determined that there was no widespread fraud in the 2020 contest and encouraged prosecution of witnesses who may have lied to the panel. The limited details gleaned from the report come after a judge allowed the release of just three sections from a document expected to include charging recommendations. Jurors involved in crafting the report had previously determined it should be released to the public in its entirety, prompting a warning from Fulton Co. District Attorney Fani Willisthat doing so could compromise the right for “multiple” future defendants in a case where charging decisions are “imminent.”

Fulton County Superior Court Judge Robert McBurney largely sided with Willis, determining that only the introduction and conclusion of the report should be released, along with one section discussing potential perjury that did not name any witnesses who appeared before the grand jury. “A majority of the witnesses believes that perjury may have been committed by one or more witnesses testifying before it. The Grand Jury recommends that the District Attorney seeks appropriate indictments for such crimes where the evidence is compelling,” the report states. Critics, including Donald Trump and others, will be able to attack the findings and poke holes in what they believe the findings to be. Fulton County prosecutors and the DA’s office will be unable to respond, and the evidence supporting their conclusions will be unknown,” Noah Bookbinder, president of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington and a former prosecutor, wrote on Twitter.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/georgia-grand-jury-in-trump-interference-probe-found-no-fraud-in-2020-election/ar-AA17y9Nt?cvid=841a4940bc4e44c7a6068b8df3d5da43

[Gromdor]

1 hour ago, Grim Reaper 6 said:

The partial release of a Georgia grand jury report evaluating former President Trump’s election interference in the state determined that there was no widespread fraud in the 2020 contest and encouraged prosecution of witnesses who may have lied to the panel. The limited details gleaned from the report come after a judge allowed the release of just three sections from a document expected to include charging recommendations. Jurors involved in crafting the report had previously determined it should be released to the public in its entirety, prompting a warning from Fulton Co. District Attorney Fani Willisthat doing so could compromise the right for “multiple” future defendants in a case where charging decisions are “imminent.”

Fulton County Superior Court Judge Robert McBurney largely sided with Willis, determining that only the introduction and conclusion of the report should be released, along with one section discussing potential perjury that did not name any witnesses who appeared before the grand jury. “A majority of the witnesses believes that perjury may have been committed by one or more witnesses testifying before it. The Grand Jury recommends that the District Attorney seeks appropriate indictments for such crimes where the evidence is compelling,” the report states. Critics, including Donald Trump and others, will be able to attack the findings and poke holes in what they believe the findings to be. Fulton County prosecutors and the DA’s office will be unable to respond, and the evidence supporting their conclusions will be unknown,” Noah Bookbinder, president of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington and a former prosecutor, wrote on Twitter.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/georgia-grand-jury-in-trump-interference-probe-found-no-fraud-in-2020-election/ar-AA17y9Nt?cvid=841a4940bc4e44c7a6068b8df3d5da43

I think the title is a bit of a misstatement.  They found no fraud in the intial 2020 election results but Trump and his associates actions are also construed as a form of election fraud which they did find evidence of.  

[HSlim]

No ****.  How many times are we going to have to keep proving this?

[spartan max2]

14 minutes ago, HSlim said:

No ****.  How many times are we going to have to keep proving this?

No amount of trials or investigations will be enough for most of them. Its a cult.

[Sir Wearer of Hats]

4 minutes ago, spartan max2 said:

No amount of trials or investigations will be enough for most of them. Its a cult.

You will see soon, people questioning the way the data was collected, allusions to how the fraud was done in such a way that any data collected would naturally be fraud sign free, repeated use of the word “obviously” and some whataboutism.

[HSlim]

8 minutes ago, Sir Wearer of Hats said:

You will see soon, people questioning the way the data was collected, allusions to how the fraud was done in such a way that any data collected would naturally be fraud sign free, repeated use of the word “obviously” and some whataboutism.

Followed by a "but they'll find out." 

[quiXilver]

Their narrative of fraud is reminiscent of Sasquatch sightings evidence.