UFO attack left US guards "screaming and babbling"

[skyeagle409]

33 minutes ago, Trelane said:

Posting more fakes does not make them true. Clearly you have no idea the construction of memos and correspondence within the DoD. 

I have never disputed that the videos Elizondo acquired without authorization or clearance were real. I simply have stated they are not videos of extraterrestrial craft. 

It's getting to be a bit tired to say this so many times through so many threads. I refuse to waste any more intellectual calories on such stupidity.

 

 I will simply say the videos do in fact, depict alien craft. The grainy videos that were revealed to the public do not match the crystal-clear images observed by the aircrews and sailors aboard the ships via data link and I might add those crystal-clear images remain classified to this very day. The reason why the videos are grainy is because they were copied over on multiple occasions and it has been revealed that the UFOs were observed in low Earth orbit before descending to 80,000 feet.

In addition, there was nothing faked in those documents, which is understandable considering those authenticated documents are also available under FOIA. 

 

 

Edited May 21, 2023 by skyeagle409

[Dejarma]

15 minutes ago, skyeagle409 said:

I will simply say the videos do in fact, depict alien craft

NO, <in fact> they do not! Are these objects alien spacecraft?== yes, they could be. It's quite possible, why wouldn't it be? But it is not a fact, Sir, please my friend...

I will show you respect for not throwing in links & quotes from other people for a nice change regarding your reply to @Trelane & using your own words. Thanks for that 

Peace..

Dej...

[skyeagle409]

3 hours ago, Dejarma said:

NO, <in fact> they do not! Are these objects alien spacecraft?== yes, they could be. It's quite possible, why wouldn't it be? But it is not a fact, Sir, please my friend...

I will show you respect for not throwing in links & quotes from other people for a nice change regarding your reply to @Trelane & using your own words. Thanks for that 

Peace..

Dej...

 

Prove me wrong by posting man-made evidence those UAPs are those of mankind. I might further add that failing to provide such evidence that proves me wrong will once again confirm my claim the videos depict alien craft. 

 

Navy Pilot Says UFO He Saw Off California Was ‘Not of This World’

A former Navy pilot has opened up about an otherworldly experience he says he experienced in 2004. His testimony comes just days after the Pentagon officially revealed the existence of a secret office investigating the existence of UFOs.

https://time.com/5070962/navy-pilot-ufo-california-not-from-this-world/

 

Notice reference in the following report to March 24, 1967, which clearly indicates there were two UFO-related incidence's involving multiple missile flights at Malmstrom AFB and in case you missed it, Lt. Col. Lewis D. Chase was the pilot of a RB-47 that was chased by a UFO over multiple states and now, he's providing information related to Malmstrom AFB.

 

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
HEADQUARTERS 341ST COMBAT SUPPORT GROUP (SAC)
MALMSTROM AIR FORCE BASE, MT 590402

REPLY TO
ATTN OF: BO 3 July 1967
SUBJECT: UFO Observations, Malmstrom AFB Area

to: Colonel James C. Manatt (lettered TDET/UFO)
HQ Foreign Technology Division (AFSC)
Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio 45433

1. Reference TDET/UFO letter dated 30 June 1967 on above subject.

2. This office has no knowledge of equipment malfunctions and abnormalities in equipment during the period of reported UFO sightings. No validity can be established to the statement that a classified government experiment was in progress or that military and civilian personnel were requested not to discuss what they had seen.

3. A written report on the events that transpired during the alleged UFO reported landing on 24 March 1967, fully documents all findings by the investigating officer. A copy of this report was forwarded to your office on 3 April 1967.

4. If we can be of further assistance to you, please do not hesitate to write.

FOR THE COMMANDER

 

LEWIS D. CHASE, Lt Colonel, USAF
Chief, Operations Division

http://www.nicap.org/babylon/missile_incidents.htm

 

Now, let's take a look at what occurred at Malmstrom AFB on March 16, 1967.

 

Colonel Walter Figel

On March 16, 1967, 10 Minuteman-I nuclear missiles operated by Malmstrom Air Force Base, Montana, suddenly malfunctioned one after the other, just as a “large round object” was reported to be hovering “directly over” one of them—according to retired USAF Col. Walter Figel, one of two launch officers on duty at Echo Flight during the incident.

Figel received the startling news while in the flight’s underground launch control center, via a two-way radio call from an Air Force security guard posted at the missile silo in question. Although skeptical, then-Lt. Figel dispatched a couple of two-man Security Alert Teams to the field to investigate. They subsequently confirmed the presence of the UFO.

 

Colonel Walter Figel Interview

WF: Then when the first [missile] went down, and I talked to the security [team] out there, they reported this UFO hovering over the site. I said, “Yeah, right. What have you guys been drinking out there?” And we [sent] Strike teams to both of the sites that had been occupied.

WF: These Strike Teams—I didn’t tell them what we had heard [about the UFO]—you know, via the LF radio, and I told them to go get within a mile of the site there and call back in on the VHF (Very High Frequency telephone). And they both reported that we had two maintenance crews, two security troops on-site, and two Strike Teams all reporting it.

 

 

Edited May 21, 2023 by skyeagle409

[Tom1200]

1 hour ago, skyeagle409 said:

Prove me wrong by posting man-made evidence those UAPs are those of mankind. I might further add that failing to provide such evidence that proves me wrong will once again confirm my claim the videos depict alien craft. 

How so?

It's the responsibility of the person making the exceptional claims to provide the evidence.  Otherwise everything that's never been properly debunked is real.  That's not logical.

Evidence might never exist to disprove a fantastic yarn, but that doesn't show the fable is real. 

What shape was King Arthur's table?  How would you attempt to prove or disprove any answer given?  According to your logic his table was every shape that hasn't been explicitly ruled out.  Do you see a problem with your approach?

It's entirely probable there have been incidents where operators have temporarily lost control of weapons systems.  What are some logical explanations for these events?

Human error.  Sabotage.  Mice eating cables.  Metal fatigue or corrosion jamming a switch.  New software malfunctioning.  Power cut.  Blurry aliens from a billion light-years away buzzing sensitive military sites to count missiles and accidentally temporarily disabling the controls. Coffee spilt on keyboard.  

Did you spot the odd-one-out?

[bmk1245]

11 hours ago, Trelane said:

The one Sky is using in his post.

The date/time group used is the most obvious one. Regardless of when this was allegedly published, it is wrong by doctrine. The letterhead is wrong too from what I can see. Not 100% certain about other errors I am observing without more comparison research. 

You mean "8 November 1975"? Now I think I remember something like that was raised way back ago in one of "Best evidence" threads.

I'm on the fence here, could have been a blunder by whoever printed that.

[Unusual Tournament]

1 hour ago, Tom1200 said:

How so?

It's the responsibility of the person making the exceptional claims to provide the evidence.  Otherwise everything that's never been properly debunked is real.  That's not logical.

Evidence might never exist to disprove a fantastic yarn, but that doesn't show the fable is real. 

What shape was King Arthur's table?  How would you attempt to prove or disprove any answer given?  According to your logic his table was every shape that hasn't been explicitly ruled out.  Do you see a problem with your approach?

It's entirely probable there have been incidents where operators have temporarily lost control of weapons systems.  What are some logical explanations for these events?

Human error.  Sabotage.  Mice eating cables.  Metal fatigue or corrosion jamming a switch.  New software malfunctioning.  Power cut.  Blurry aliens from a billion light-years away buzzing sensitive military sites to count missiles and accidentally temporarily disabling the controls. Coffee spilt on keyboard.  

Did you spot the odd-one-out?

Military pilots with a better understanding of aerodynamics and propulsion systems than you or I do not attribute these UAP/UFO’s to mice eating cables and loss weapons. 

[Unusual Tournament]

@skyeagle409 

Again thanks for sharing your experiences and excellent insights 

[Trelane]

4 hours ago, bmk1245 said:

You mean "8 November 1975"? Now I think I remember something like that was raised way back ago in one of "Best evidence" threads.

I'm on the fence here, could have been a blunder by whoever printed that.

That and more importantly how they used a time zone almost never used in any military memos or orders.

Items like these, if real, go through a production process where several eyes are on them before publication. Simple formatting errors would be caught by the lowest ranking admin specialist.

[bmk1245]

1 hour ago, Trelane said:

That and more importantly how they used a time zone almost never used in any military memos or orders.

Items like these, if real, go through a production process where several eyes are on them before publication. Simple formatting errors would be caught by the lowest ranking admin specialist.

OK, can't argue with that, its outside the scope of my expertise.

[Tom1200]

6 hours ago, Unusual Tournament said:

Military pilots with a better understanding of aerodynamics and propulsion systems than you or I do not attribute these UAP/UFO’s to mice eating cables and loss weapons. 

Maybe read my post next time before trying to dismiss it. 

@skyeagle409's logic was wrong.  Where's the harm in pointing that out?

 

Edited May 21, 2023 by Tom1200

[bmk1245]

7 hours ago, Unusual Tournament said:

Military pilots with a better understanding of aerodynamics and propulsion systems than you or I do not attribute these UAP/UFO’s to mice eating cables and loss weapons. 

Yeah, but majority of incidents/accidents in aviation are due to human factor. Pilots (in military or civil aviation) are not supermen, they do make mistakes.

[Unusual Tournament]

1 hour ago, bmk1245 said:

Yeah, but majority of incidents/accidents in aviation are due to human factor. Pilots (in military or civil aviation) are not supermen, they do make mistakes.

Not arguing about the majority JUST the substantial number of documented cases involving military personnel and other professionals 

[skyeagle409]

10 hours ago, Tom1200 said:

How so?

It's the responsibility of the person making the exceptional claims to provide the evidence.  Otherwise everything that's never been properly debunked is real.  That's not logical.

Evidence might never exist to disprove a fantastic yarn, but that doesn't show the fable is real. 

What shape was King Arthur's table?  How would you attempt to prove or disprove any answer given?  According to your logic his table was every shape that hasn't been explicitly ruled out.  Do you see a problem with your approach?

It's entirely probable there have been incidents where operators have temporarily lost control of weapons systems.  What are some logical explanations for these events?

Human error.  Sabotage.  Mice eating cables.  Metal fatigue or corrosion jamming a switch.  New software malfunctioning.  Power cut.  Blurry aliens from a billion light-years away buzzing sensitive military sites to count missiles and accidentally temporarily disabling the controls. Coffee spilt on keyboard.  

Did you spot the odd-one-out?

 

It's all very simple. I have stated those UAPs are not those of mankind based on the performance capabilities alone as demonstrated on radar, satellites, and other tracking systems as well as eyewitness accounts that corroborated details as recorded by those tracking systems. Secondly, we don't have aircraft that can travel at supersonic speeds within the atmosphere and not generate a sonic boom and yet, that is exactly what has been recorded and that fact alone exclude UAPs as those of mankind. Thirdly, I know as a fact they are not military experimental aircraft because that is not the way we conduct business is our classified assets. The name of the game is to keep those classified assets a secret and you are not going to keep them a secret by parading them in broad daylight over cities and flying them in such a manner that they create flight safety issues with commercial and military aircraft. Here's another example why those UAPs are not those of mankind.

B-29 Encounters High-Speed Targets Over Gulf
December 6, 1952
Gulf of Mexico

This report is case #8, on the official clearance list of 41 formerly classified Air Technical Intelligence UFO reports cleared for Maj. Donald E. Keyhoe by Albert M. Chop, Air Force Press Desk.

Dec. 6, 1952. About 100 miles S of Louisiana coast in Gulf of Mexico (BBU)
5:25-5:35 [5:37?] a.m. (CST). USAF crew of B-29 bomber, based at 3510th Flight Training Wing (Medium Bomber), Randolph AFB, Texas, radar observer 1st Lt Norman Karas, radar observer/Instructor Navigator 1st Lt. William W. Naumann, Jr., Staff Sgt B. R. Purcell, Staff Sgt. William J. De Rause, 2nd Lt. Robert J. Eckert, Staff Sgt. Harry D. Shogren. B-29 flying at 20,000 ft, course 320° true ground track (315° heading with wind from 276° 24 knots), 186 knots (214 mph) ground speed, 204 knots true air speed, tracked on radar one or a few high speed targets at a time moving in a straight line at about 5,240 stat. mph, followed by more targets [one or one new group about every minute for 5 minutes] also moving SE [ESE] typically at about 5,000+ mph. Initial targets, about 4 small blips in a group, approached from 330° true on a SE [ESE] heading moving 12-14 NM per 2.25 sec radar sweep [about 22,000 to 26,000 mph] passed B-29 at 15-20 (naut.) miles range at 70° true azimuth when stopwatch timing began, and disappeared at true azimuth 150° at a timed speed of 5,240 mph [apparently slowed].

At 5:35 a.m. (CST) Naumann tracked several (5?) blips merging into a ½-inch arc about 30 nautical miles away (on 5-inch diameter radar scope set to 50 n.mi. radius thus about 10 nm arc) at 320° [true] bearing and crossed the scope moving out of range at 9,000+ mph.

 

And of course, we can't forget Malmstrom AFB.

NATIONAL SECURITY

During the events of that morning in 1967, UFOs were sighted by security personnel at the Oscar Flight LCC and at one O-Flight LF, and by other security and maintenance personnel at Echo-Flight LFs. These sightings were reported separately to the capsule crews at both LCCs at or about the same time Minuteman Strategic missiles shut down at both sites. USAF has confirmed that all of Echo flights' missiles shutdown within seconds of each other and that no cause for this could be found.

http://www.cufon.org/cufon/malmstrom/malm1.htm

 

 

[skyeagle409]

3 hours ago, Tom1200 said:

Maybe read my post next time before trying to dismiss it. 

@skyeagle409's logic was wrong.  Where's the harm in pointing that out?

 

 

Why do you think I have been requesting man-made evidence that refutes my ET statement? My logic is based on knowledge, experience, facts and connections with the U. S. military. In addition, I am a pilot who is well aware of what the performance data on UAPs reveal. I have repeatedly posted government documentation available under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and from military and intelligence sources along with government performance data on UAPs and based on what I know, I have stated for the record they represent vehicles of extraterrestrials.

[bmk1245]

3 hours ago, Unusual Tournament said:

Not arguing about the majority JUST the substantial number of documented cases involving military personnel and other professionals 

Ask military guys what is the shape (three blade, five blade, etc) of iris in their optical eqipment. 

[bmk1245]

1 hour ago, skyeagle409 said:

[...] I have stated for the record they represent vehicles of extraterrestrials.

Are you serious? Say you are joking.

[Tom1200]

1 hour ago, skyeagle409 said:

Why do you think I have been requesting man-made evidence that refutes my ET statement? 

Of over 12,600 UFO incidents reported to Project Blue Book (1952-1969) just 5% could not be explained: there was insufficient evidence to reach any satisfactory conclusion. 

That means 95% of all UFO incidents reported had simple terrestrial explanations.  I submit that counts towards the considerable body of evidence that UFO sightings are not extraterrestrial in origin.

Of course that does leave 700 reports with no immediate and obvious explanation, but I suspect human error or instrument failure could account for most.  60+ years on I rather doubt that any new evidence will arise to clear up any of these cases, so go ahead and believe whatever you want.

6 minutes ago, bmk1245 said:

Ask military guys what is the shape (three blade, five blade, etc) of iris in their optical eqipment. 

Please explain the significance of that?  Thanks.

 

[bmk1245]

16 minutes ago, Tom1200 said:

Please explain the significance of that?  Thanks.

Triangle UFO in "Pentagon leaked video" (first 15 secs)

Knowing pecularities of your equipment is essential.

Edited May 21, 2023 by bmk1245

[skyeagle409]

5 hours ago, bmk1245 said:

Are you serious? Say you are joking.

 

I am serious!! After all, documentation and data have backed up what I have stated for the record, which explains why no one has been able to post man-made evidence that refutes what I have said and don't think for a second that I haven't noticed.

Edited May 22, 2023 by skyeagle409

[skyeagle409]

5 hours ago, Tom1200 said:

Of over 12,600 UFO incidents reported to Project Blue Book (1952-1969) just 5% could not be explained: there was insufficient evidence to reach any satisfactory conclusion. 

That means 95% of all UFO incidents reported had simple terrestrial explanations.  I submit that counts towards the considerable body of evidence that UFO sightings are not extraterrestrial in origin.

Of course that does leave 700 reports with no immediate and obvious explanation, but I suspect human error or instrument failure could account for most.  60+ years on I rather doubt that any new evidence will arise to clear up any of these cases, so go ahead and believe whatever you want.

Please explain the significance of that?  Thanks.

 

About Project Blue. It is a joke. Case in point, was the RB-47 UFO encounter that I recently brought up. The pilot of that RB-47 was Lt. Col. Lewis D. Chase, the same Air Force officer who wrote a report on the Malmstrom AFB UFO incident.

Project Blue Book explained away that incident in the most ridicule conclusion to say the least. Project Blue Book concluded that the UFO that chased and maneuvered around the jet bomber over multiple states was a DC-6 propeller-driven commercial airliner that was hundreds of miles away from the encounter.   The ELINT equipment aboard this aircraft detected the UFO during the encounter and was confirmed by ground-based radar, code named; "Utah. Project Blue Book referred this encounter as a near-collision of two DC-6 American Airliners near Salt Flats, Texas, 50 mi. from El Paso at 14,000 ft at 3:30 a.m. of this day. The case is now carried in the official Blue Book files as "Identified as American Airlines Flight 655."  Typical of the way Project Blue Book explained away UFO cases, so let's do comparisons between the RB-47 and a DC-6, keeping in mind the DC-6 is outmatched by the RB-47 and was hundreds of miles away from the encounter, yet Project Blue Book concluded that airliner was the UFO that chased the jet bomber. Common sense would have determined without question that Project Blue Book attempted to cover-up that encounter.
 

RB-47
http://www.fas.org/irp/program/collect/rb-47-side-s.jpg

Performance

Manufacturer: Boeing Aircraft Company (primary), Douglas and Lockheed

Nickname: Stratojet

Crew: 3 - Pilot, Copilot, Navigator

Gross Weight: 206,700 lbs

No. of Engines: 6

Powerplant: General Electric J-47-GE-25 turbojet engines; JATO (Jet Assisted Take-Off) using auxiliary rocket motors that are jettisoned after take-off.

Thrust (each): 7,200 lbs

Combat Speed: 557 mph at 38,500 ft

Max Speed: 600 mph

Service Ceiling: 40,500 ft

Range: 4,000 mi

------------------------------------------------------------------

DC-6

Performance

Cruise speed: 274 knots (315 mph, 507 km/h)

Range: 2,610 nm (3,010 mi, 4,840 km)

Service ceiling: 25,000 ft (7,600 m)

Rate of climb: 1,070 ft/min (5.44 m/s)

Powerplant: 4× radial engine, 2,500 hp (1,700 kW) with water injection each

Propellers: Hamilton Standard 43E60 "Hydromatic" constant speed props with autofeather and reverse thrust

 

On the other note:

 

Pentagon confirms recently released video of pyramid-shaped UFOs near San Diego is authentic

SAN DIEGO, Calif. - Government officials have confirmed that a recently released video showing triangular objects flying off the coast of San Diego is real, prompting a plethora of questions. "Who are they, where are they from, and what is their intent?" asked LA-based investigative filmmaker Jeremy Corbell, who published the video online. It was captured by the Navy in July 2019, and shows the pyramid-shaped aircraft flying over the U.S. warship USS Russell. 

 https://www.foxla.com/news/pyramid-shaped-ufos-spotted-by-navy-may-be-the-best-the-world-has-ever-seen-filmmaker-says

Pyramid-shaped UFOs spotted by Navy may be the best 'the world has ever seen,' filmmaker says

An 18-second video shows what is described as three pyramid-shaped UFOs hovering over the warship USS Russell at night in July of 2019 off the San Diego coast. At one point, the pyramid-shaped crafts reportedly hovered 700 feet over the tail of the Russell.

https://www.foxla.com/news/pyramid-shaped-ufos-spotted-by-navy-may-be-the-best-the-world-has-ever-seen-filmmaker-says

Edited May 22, 2023 by skyeagle409

[skyeagle409]

5 hours ago, bmk1245 said:

Ask military guys what is the shape (three blade, five blade, etc) of iris in their optical eqipment. 

 

Regarding descriptions by military personnel, let's take a look at a few of the typical descriptions as described by the military for many years.here. Considering that mankind did not have supersonic flying saucers or discs when these reports were made simply means the flying saucers in the following reports could not have been those of mankind by that very fact, hence my request for folks to post evidence that proves UAPs as those of mankind. In case you missed it before, here they are:

 

 

 

 

 Pentagon confirms leaked images and videos of UFOs buzzing over US Navy warships are genuine

Official tells Telegraph unexplained images of pyramid-shaped were taken by navy personnel off the coast of California

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2021/04/13/pentagon-investigates-pulsating-pyramid-shaped-ufos-california/

 

INTRODUCTORY SPACE SCIENCE - VOLUME II
CHAPTER XXXIII 
UNIDENTIFIED FLYING OBJECTS 
DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICS - USAF 
UNITED STATES AIR FORCE ACADEMY 

About ten o'clock one morning, a radar site near a fighter base picked up a UFO doing 700 mph. The UFO then slowed to 100 mph, and two F-86's were scrambled to intercept. Eventually one F-86 closed on the UFO at about 3,000 feet altitude.  The UFO began to accelerate away but the pilot still managed to get within 500 yards of the target for a short period of time.  It was definitely saucer-shaped.  As the pilot pushed the F-86 at top speed, the UFO began to pull away.  When the range reached 1,000 yards, the pilot armed his guns and fired in an attempt to down the saucer.  He failed, and the UFO pulled away rapidly, vanishing in the distance. 

CONFIDENTIAL

HEADQUARTERS MUROC ARMY AIR FIELD
OFFICE OF THE COMMANDING OFFICER
MUROC, CALIFORNIA
                                                                                   

 SUBJECT: Evaluation of "Flying Discs"

 http://www.nicap.org/murocdoc.htm

 

HOW SCIENTISTS TRACKED A FLYING SAUCER
by
Commander Robert B. McLaughlin, USN

http://www.nicap.org/true-mc.htm  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited May 22, 2023 by skyeagle409

[skyeagle409]

14 hours ago, Trelane said:

That and more importantly how they used a time zone almost never used in any military memos or orders.

Items like these, if real, go through a production process where several eyes are on them before publication. Simple formatting errors would be caught by the lowest ranking admin specialist.

 

Correct me if  I am wrong and for the record, are you claiming the documents I've posted are fakes? 

[bmk1245]

4 hours ago, skyeagle409 said:

 

I am serious!! After all, documentation and data have backed up what I have stated for the record, which explains why no one has been able to post man-made evidence that refutes what I have said and don't think for a second that I haven't noticed.

OK, tell me what you see in the following photos (hint, mirror lense)

[bmk1245]

3 hours ago, skyeagle409 said:

 

Regarding descriptions by military personnel, let's take a look at a few of the typical descriptions as described by the military for many years.here. Considering that mankind did not have supersonic flying saucers or discs when these reports were made simply means the flying saucers in the following reports could not have been those of mankind by that very fact, hence my request for folks to post evidence that proves UAPs as those of mankind. In case you missed it before, here they are:

 

 

 

 

 Pentagon confirms leaked images and videos of UFOs buzzing over US Navy warships are genuine

Official tells Telegraph unexplained images of pyramid-shaped were taken by navy personnel off the coast of California

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2021/04/13/pentagon-investigates-pulsating-pyramid-shaped-ufos-california/

 

INTRODUCTORY SPACE SCIENCE - VOLUME II
CHAPTER XXXIII 
UNIDENTIFIED FLYING OBJECTS 
DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICS - USAF 
UNITED STATES AIR FORCE ACADEMY 

About ten o'clock one morning, a radar site near a fighter base picked up a UFO doing 700 mph. The UFO then slowed to 100 mph, and two F-86's were scrambled to intercept. Eventually one F-86 closed on the UFO at about 3,000 feet altitude.  The UFO began to accelerate away but the pilot still managed to get within 500 yards of the target for a short period of time.  It was definitely saucer-shaped.  As the pilot pushed the F-86 at top speed, the UFO began to pull away.  When the range reached 1,000 yards, the pilot armed his guns and fired in an attempt to down the saucer.  He failed, and the UFO pulled away rapidly, vanishing in the distance. 

CONFIDENTIAL

HEADQUARTERS MUROC ARMY AIR FIELD
OFFICE OF THE COMMANDING OFFICER
MUROC, CALIFORNIA
                                                                                   

 SUBJECT: Evaluation of "Flying Discs"

 http://www.nicap.org/murocdoc.htm

 

HOW SCIENTISTS TRACKED A FLYING SAUCER
by
Commander Robert B. McLaughlin, USN

http://www.nicap.org/true-mc.htm  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yeah, yeah, yeah... Flying saucer

[Tom1200]

5 hours ago, bmk1245 said:

OK, tell me what you see in the following photos (hint, mirror lense)

Top two - an owl.

Bottom two - a sleepy owl.

9 hours ago, skyeagle409 said:

https://www.foxla.com/news/pyramid-shaped-ufos-spotted-by-navy-may-be-the-best-the-world-has-ever-seen-filmmaker-says

That's seriously the best evidence available?

Any sarcastic comment I now make would be completely wasted.  So go ahead: believe that the ONLY possible explanation for these inconspicuous blips is aliens dunnit.

9 hours ago, skyeagle409 said:

About Project Blue. It is a joke.

If so, if its only purpose was to discredit alleged sightings, why did they leave over 700 as unexplained?  

Perhaps not every case was investigated as thoroughly as we might hope.  I can imagine they got rather bored and blasé after the first several thousands nonsense reports.  Possibly it was late on a Friday and they just wanted to clock off early, so rubber-stamped a few folders "just another effing balloon"? Maybe someone with sufficient time and paranoia can dig through the caseload and pick holes in enough to fuel a conspiracy theory.  But me? I'll look for simpler explanations.