Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -

Jesus. A man of peace?


Abramelin

Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, Piney said:

And you don't have a shred otherwise.

There is plenty of evidence to suggest that consciousness continues after the physical death.

See post #70.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Crazy Horse said:

There is plenty of evidence to suggest that consciousness continues after the physical death.

See post #70.

Meanwhile, in Kenya... 

Quote
5 days ago  Children were targeted as the first to be starved to death in the final days of a Christian doomsday cult in Kenya, according to fresh ...
 
 
 
 
 
6 days ago  Searchers for survivors and victims of a doomsday cult in Kenya's Shakahola forest discovered 22 more bodies on Saturday, according to a ...
 
 
 
 
6 days ago  The number of victims of a starvation cult in Kenya's Shakahola forest has risen to 201 after 22 more bodies were recovered, according to ...
 
 
 
 
 
1 day ago  Tipped off by defectors from the cult, Mr. Kaudo found emaciated believers who, though in the throes of death, cursed him as “an enemy of

~

 

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
  • Sad 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, cormac mac airt said:

I can’t prove a negative. The onus is on you that it DOESN’T stop. So far you’ve shown nothing. And as science has shown human consciousness requires a brain. :rolleyes:
 

cormac

I have already shown how consciousness is non-local to the brain, which means that it could continue after death.

Or perhaps you can explain how someone having a NDE, can come back and know certain things that were non-local.

For example, the man who saw and spoke to a dead relative, only the relative had died whilst the man was having his NDE, and could not possibly know this.

Explain that, and countless other examples too.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Crazy Horse said:

Do hallucinations and delusions give one information, for example, of where missing people are?

Because that would mean that consciousness is non-local to the brain.

Which in turn means that there is a good chance of consciousness going-on, after the physical body dies.

And the hilarious part is you have no takers.

On top of the fact you use the name of a deceased  Blotaa hunka Akicita and Dreamer, which is disrespectful to the Lakota in so many ways. 

 

  • Thanks 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Piney said:

And the hilarious part is you have no takers.

On top of the fact you use the name of a deceased  Blotaa hunka Akicita and Dreamer, which is disrespectful to the Lakota in so many ways. 

 

What is really hilarious is that you have no argument outside the usual insults.

And my name is a point of remembrance, to a great man.

So unless you can speak for all the Lakota..

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Crazy Horse said:

I have already shown how consciousness is non-local to the brain, which means that it could continue after death.

Or perhaps you can explain how someone having a NDE, can come back and know certain things that were non-local.

For example, the man who saw and spoke to a dead relative, only the relative had died whilst the man was having his NDE, and could not possibly know this.

Explain that, and countless other examples too.

 

Hi Crazy Horse

Near death is not death so consciousness never left the body

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Crazy Horse said:

If you don't understand this, you probably need some more milk..

Maybe you really need to read the OP.

  • Thanks 3
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, jmccr8 said:

Hi Crazy Horse

Near death is not death so consciousness never left the body

So, what's that got to do with my point.

Does a psychic "knowing" where a missing person is - did I say they were dead?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Crazy Horse said:

What is really hilarious is that you have no argument outside the usual insults.

And my name is a point of remembrance, to a great man.

So unless you can speak for all the Lakota..

I know their language, customs and know people get beaten up by their Akacita for using it.  So yes. 

And there is no insults, just the facts.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

And yet the truth remains that there doesn't need to be proof in order for something to be true.

But it sure can be denied.

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Crazy Horse said:

So, what's that got to do with my point.

Does a psychic "knowing" where a missing person is - did I say they were dead?

I have watched many "Disappeared" episodes on IDTV, but never was it said someone was found by following the directions of some psychic.

  • Like 4
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Piney said:

I know their language, customs and know people get beaten up by their Akacita for using it.  So yes. 

And there is no insults, just the facts.

But do you speak for every Lakota?

Because that seems to be a pretty insulting thing to claim.

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Crazy Horse said:

I have already shown how consciousness is non-local to the brain, which means that it could continue after death.

Or perhaps you can explain how someone having a NDE, can come back and know certain things that were non-local.

For example, the man who saw and spoke to a dead relative, only the relative had died whilst the man was having his NDE, and could not possibly know this.

Explain that, and countless other examples too.

 

Do you have a link for this claim?


Near death is not classified as biological death, they are not the same thing, you are not even clear on what you are talking about. 

 

Edited by Sherapy
  • Like 2
  • Thanks 3
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Will Due said:

 

And yet the truth remains that there doesn't need to be proof in order for something to be true.

But it sure can be denied.

 

It sure can, even when all the evidence suggests otherwise.

I wonder what the actual Crazy Horse had to say about the afterlife?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Crazy Horse said:

But do you speak for every Lakota?

Because that seems to be a pretty insulting thing to claim.

Their custom says you do not claim/ use the name of a respected person after they are deceased.

And Taashunkaa Wiitko, which is how you actually say his named hated all things Christian. 

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Crazy Horse said:

Yes, Christ is many things to many people.

But, to me, those teaching that seem contradictory are simply given to help the individual, at that moment. Milk for babes, and meat for men, type of thing.

For example, to love and respect ones parents is normal, (in this mundane world) but the higher teaching would be that we are all one - GOD - but to realise THAT, one must let-go of all attachments, notions, ideas and thoughts in general.

If you don't understand this, you probably need some more milk..

Hi Crazy Horse

If you admit that you have only read parts of the new testsament then you have not stufied what is in the bible. What you have is an opinion that you have crafted into a belief system which is unsupported by the very bible you cherry picked rabbit raisins from.

Am heading out of town now so it may be several hours before I can read or respond again.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Crazy Horse said:

I have already shown how consciousness is non-local to the brain, which means that it could continue after death.

Or perhaps you can explain how someone having a NDE, can come back and know certain things that were non-local.

For example, the man who saw and spoke to a dead relative, only the relative had died whilst the man was having his NDE, and could not possibly know this.

Explain that, and countless other examples too.

 

Perhaps you can explain how an NDE IS DEATH? It isn’t. The rest of your post is anecdotal at best. 

cormac

  • Like 5
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, jmccr8 said:

Hi Crazy Horse

If you admit that you have only read parts of the new testsament then you have not stufied what is in the bible. What you have is an opinion that you have crafted into a belief system which is unsupported by the very bible you cherry picked rabbit raisins from.

Am heading out of town now so it may be several hours before I can read or respond again.

Have a safe trip.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Crazy Horse said:

It sure can, even when all the evidence suggests otherwise.

I wonder what the actual Crazy Horse had to say about the afterlife?

He believed in the reincarnation of his Skan Soul while his Earth Soul watched his people

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, the prophet Equinius states that self-centered selfishness and narcissistic self-love is the key to enlightenment, happiness and a world that smells of charbroiled cheeseburgers, evermore? Well, I'm sold!

Edited by Hammerclaw
  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, cormac mac airt said:

Perhaps you can explain how an NDE IS DEATH? It isn’t. The rest of your post is anecdotal at best. 

cormac

I didn't say a NDE is an actual death, (stop with the strawman).

What I claimed is that there is overwhelming evidence to show, how, many many people come back from a NDE with information concerning things that they could not possible know.

Therefore, it figures, (unless you have a different explanation), that ones consciousness can, and does work away from the brain. One may even suggest that all consciousness is one..

And you are at liberty to ignore all the evidence, but that's not a very scientific attitude, right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Piney said:

He believed in the reincarnation of his Skan Soul while his Earth Soul watched his people

Ok, thank you..

He believed in reincarnation, great.

Ones consciousness continuing after the physical body has died.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, cormac mac airt said:

Perhaps you can explain how an NDE IS DEATH? It isn’t. The rest of your post is anecdotal at best. 

cormac

 

14 minutes ago, cormac mac airt said:

Perhaps you can explain how an NDE IS DEATH? It isn’t. The rest of your post is anecdotal at best. 

cormac

Most if not the majority of NDE’s are due to serious injury to the brain or a whole lot of drugs keeping a person in an induced coma to heal physically. IMHO
 

Case in point, my middle son was riding his bicycle was hit by a car, he flew off his bike, hit his head on the fender of a parked car, he was knocked out cold, in a coma for 11 days when he came to he had all kinds of wild stories, sheesh, the doctor told him this was common in head injuries, it will pass. 
 

 

Edited by Sherapy
  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Crazy Horse said:

I didn't say a NDE is an actual death, (stop with the strawman).

What I claimed is that there is overwhelming evidence to show, how, many many people come back from a NDE with information concerning things that they could not possible know.

Therefore, it figures, (unless you have a different explanation), that ones consciousness can, and does work away from the brain. One may even suggest that all consciousness is one..

And you are at liberty to ignore all the evidence, but that's not a very scientific attitude, right?


IMG_0736.thumb.jpeg.cec1a862ded6d245b2422469f97d4282.jpeg

So you’re just an outright liar then as you’ve attempted to use Post 70 to mean exactly that? That not really unexpected. 
 

Btw, you don’t know how to use the scientific method so let’s not pretend you’re remotely competent in that regard. 
 

cormac

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 3
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Crazy Horse said:

I didn't say a NDE is an actual death, (stop with the strawman).

What I claimed is that there is overwhelming evidence to show, how, many many people come back from a NDE with information concerning things that they could not possible know.

Therefore, it figures, (unless you have a different explanation), that ones consciousness can, and does work away from the brain. One may even suggest that all consciousness is one..

And you are at liberty to ignore all the evidence, but that's not a very scientific attitude, right?

You have made the error, NDE and Death are not the same thing. And lots of stories is only evident of hear say or subjective narratives. This is an important point dude. :P The issue is your own gullibility, meaning you believe what ever you read or hear without evidence. This is on you to correct. The appropriate response is just to refine, learn something, and stand corrected. 

Edited by Sherapy
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • This topic was locked and unlocked

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.