F-16 to Ukraine means NATO involvement in conflict, says Russia

[DarkHunter]

1 hour ago, Unusual Tournament said:

Certain roads and highways, yes. But not all. 

They need to be paved, more or less level, and mostly straight which Ukraine has or are you now going to push the Russian propaganda that Ukraine is a third world country lacking basic infrastructure through most of the country and having few paved roads and highways

[Unusual Tournament]

21 minutes ago, DarkHunter said:

They need to be paved, more or less level, and mostly straight which Ukraine has or are you now going to push the Russian propaganda that Ukraine is a third world country lacking basic infrastructure through most of the country and having few paved roads and highways

It’s a little more complicated than a concrete highway. You need clearance on either side, a very flat camber on the road. You need support services to refuel, rearm and change pilots. Saying a fighter can land on a highway works but to what purpose?

[Stiff]

4 hours ago, Unusual Tournament said:

It’s a little more complicated than a concrete highway. You need clearance on either side, a very flat camber on the road. You need support services to refuel, rearm and change pilots. Saying a fighter can land on a highway works but to what purpose?

You're just overly complicating things for no reason except to argue in desperation and sheer frustration. He didn't claim they could take off or land from any or every highway, just that they weren't necessarily restricted to high maintenance, high cost runways. It's that simple.