Phantom309 Posted May 23 #1 Share Posted May 23 Quite the story - and this study was done way back in the early 60's: 2 Top Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dejarma Posted May 23 #2 Share Posted May 23 cosmic top secret yet we're hearing about it.. oh so secret= cosmic in fact 1 1 2 Top Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hankenhunter Posted May 24 #3 Share Posted May 24 55 minutes ago, Dejarma said: cosmic top secret yet we're hearing about it.. oh so secret= cosmic in fact Trolling again eh? Talk about reaching for low hanging fruit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phantom309 Posted May 24 Author #4 Share Posted May 24 13 hours ago, Hankenhunter said: Trolling again eh? Talk about reaching for low hanging fruit. Heya Harken- he's one of the clowns I dumped into my "ignore" category quite some time ago - now I only see his drivel if someone quotes him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trelane Posted May 24 #5 Share Posted May 24 (edited) How does one apply for a "Cosmic Top Secret " clearance? Which office has oversight responsibility? Bob Dean again huh? This should be amusing. Edited May 24 by Trelane 2 1 1 Top Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dejarma Posted May 24 #6 Share Posted May 24 1 hour ago, Trelane said: Bob Dean again huh? This should be amusing. yep, oh joy- spiffing 1 Top Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dejarma Posted May 25 #7 Share Posted May 25 14 hours ago, Phantom309 said: Heya Harken- he's one of the clowns I dumped into my "ignore" category quite some time ago - now I only see his drivel if someone quotes him. show conviction in your course & never reply or mention even indirectly to me again!!! don't try to be clever with me silly boy-do you get it?? now fek off you weak individual. you won't see this will ya.. cuz i'm on ignore 1 Top Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trelane Posted May 26 #8 Share Posted May 26 Funny how no one does the smallest of following up on subjects. Just more "seagull posting". "THE TRUTH ABOUT AN ALLEGED 1960S REPORT BY SHAPE ON THE THREAT POSED BY UFOS?" https://shape.nato.int/page2148213115 "We have analyzed these claims in detail, including a photograph alleged to be of the front cover of the assessment, and have concluded that the cover page is a forgery and that SHAPE prepared no report on UFOs during the 1960s. While some will no doubt dismiss this conclusion as part of some sort of long-standing cover-up of the existence of UFOs, we would like to point out that in the 1960s – like today - SHAPE was confronted by much more pressing threats than UFOS and did not have the time and resources to spend 2½ years studying them, as Sergeant Major Dean alleges. We are not saying that UFOs do or do not exist but simply that SHAPE did not prepare a report on them." 2 Top Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now