Amita Posted May 30 #1 Share Posted May 30 https://brownstone.org/articles/cheat-sheet-for-legislators-regarding-who-health-emergencies/ Five points about WHO that are not popular. 2 1 Top Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pellinore Posted May 30 #2 Share Posted May 30 (edited) 44 minutes ago, Amita said: https://brownstone.org/articles/cheat-sheet-for-legislators-regarding-who-health-emergencies/ Five points about WHO that are not popular. Some points about Brownstone:New Institute Has Ties to the Great Barrington Declaration | MedPage Today Edited May 30 by pellinore 2 Top Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+and-then Posted May 31 #3 Share Posted May 31 7 hours ago, pellinore said: Some points about Brownstone:New Institute Has Ties to the Great Barrington Declaration | MedPage Today Do you have anything to dispute the claims made in the article? The source should hardly be more important than the content. Feel free to dispute any of the points made in the OP's article. I seem to recall that the WHO bent over backward to support any assertion made by Beijing, early in the pandemic. 1 Top Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pellinore Posted May 31 #4 Share Posted May 31 40 minutes ago, and-then said: Do you have anything to dispute the claims made in the article? The source should hardly be more important than the content. Feel free to dispute any of the points made in the OP's article. I seem to recall that the WHO bent over backward to support any assertion made by Beijing, early in the pandemic. Of course the source is important: Breibart, Fox News and GBNews, for example, are always reporting factually incorrect stuff. And if someone refuses to believe the judgements of "experts" and prefers the views of people "educated in the University of Life" or who use "common sense" and "do their own research on Facebook" then what is the point of disputing the article? But here goes anyway: Covid-19: The history of pandemics - BBC Future 2 1 1 Top Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Essan Posted June 2 #5 Share Posted June 2 "Foreign based" Obviously written by a xenophobic American Amazingly, most people on the planet are "foreigners" and not every global organisation is run by the USA ...... btw with regards WHO "wanting new powers to enforce lockdowns etc in event of a future pandemic" (the main reason xenophobic Americans - and Britons - are now opposed to the organisation) - that's a lie. It's democratic African countries that have petitioned for WHO to amend that particular wording in the International Health Regulations (2005). 3 Top Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amita Posted June 2 Author #6 Share Posted June 2 Latest gathering WHA is over for now: https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/world-health-assembly-personal-liberties-emergency-powers/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amita Posted June 7 Author #7 Share Posted June 7 https://resistancepress.com/article/who-govern-health-world Controlling every aspect of human life - who could object - what could go wrong. 1 Top Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psyche101 Posted June 7 #8 Share Posted June 7 1 hour ago, Amita said: https://resistancepress.com/article/who-govern-health-world Controlling every aspect of human life - who could object - what could go wrong. Less could go wrong than did with stupid leaders who think conspiracy theories are fact. There is a lot of blood on their hands Not sure why so many are opposed to proven more competent organisations placed where they belong to provide an improved outcome. Why do people think less competent leaders are even worth the time of day considering track records of America or Brazil? 5 Top Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emma_Acid Posted July 10 #9 Share Posted July 10 On 5/31/2023 at 5:46 AM, and-then said: The source should hardly be more important than the content. Which is a hugely hypocritical thing to say when most conspiracists are the first to shoot something down based solely on the messenger rather than the message. You did this exact thing on the Jane Fonda / climate change thread. 4 Top Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SHaYap Posted July 10 #10 Share Posted July 10 If WHO asks why... Quote Always ask, the Pillow Guy... ~ 1 Top Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scholar4Truth Posted July 20 #11 Share Posted July 20 On 7/10/2023 at 6:26 AM, SHaYap said: If WHO asks why... Always ask, the Pillow Guy... ~ Well sadly Mr Pillow Guy had an auction that flopped which lost him $100 Million Dollars https://www.newsweek.com/mike-lindell-auction-flops-multiple-mypillow-products-fail-sell-1813941 1 2 Top Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SHaYap Posted July 20 #12 Share Posted July 20 Just now, Scholar4Truth said: Well sadly Mr Pillow Guy had an auction that flopped which lost him $100 Million Dollars https://www.newsweek.com/mike-lindell-auction-flops-multiple-mypillow-products-fail-sell-1813941 I must have slept through it... ~ 1 Top Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now