US military has been observing ‘metallic orbs’ making extraordinary ‘maneuvers’

[Unusual Tournament]

US military has been observing ‘metallic orbs’ making extraordinary ‘maneuvers’
 

a key Defense Department official made a striking disclosure. Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick, director of a new UAP analysis office, stated that U.S. military personnel are observing “metallic orbs” “all over the world.” 

 

https://thehill.com/opinion/national-security/4030026-us-military-has-been-observing-metallic-orbs-making-extraordinary-maneuvers/

[Trelane]

Oh thank God! I was getting worried we weren't going to get another thread referring to the "gimbal" and "go fast" videos. 

[Unusual Tournament]

Interesting article and I recommend all serious readers who follow the frequent occurrences of these UAP/UFO and their stalking of military assets to read the article on full.
 

…and that’s the real issue here, unidentified objects in restricted airspace. Natural phenomena just doesn’t purposefully target highly sensitive military sites. 
 

 

[Dejarma]

so now UAP stands for 'unidentified anomalous phenomena' not 'unidentified aerial phenomena' 

[Golden Duck]

1 hour ago, Unusual Tournament said:

Interesting article and I recommend all serious readers who follow the frequent occurrences of these UAP/UFO and their stalking of military assets to read the article on full.
 

…and that’s the real issue here, unidentified objects in restricted airspace. Natural phenomena just doesn’t purposefully target highly sensitive military sites. 
 

 

You're trying to compare observations of UAP in areas under surveillance, with observations of UAP in areas NOT under surveillance.  Do you see the logical fallacy in your reasoning?

[Dejarma]

2 hours ago, Unusual Tournament said:

Interesting article and I recommend all serious readers who follow the frequent occurrences of these UAP/UFO and their stalking of military assets to read the article on full.
 

…and that’s the real issue here, unidentified objects in restricted airspace. Natural phenomena just doesn’t purposefully target highly sensitive military sites. 
 

 

do you believe everything you read? i asked you this a while back but no reply- your cohort did. maybe you should PM him for advice on how to respond 

[Unusual Tournament]

8 minutes ago, Golden Duck said:

You're trying to compare observations of UAP in areas under surveillance, with observations of UAP in areas NOT under surveillance.  Do you see the logical fallacy in your reasoning?

Not really, since I’ve clearly stated multiple times that not all UFO/UAP sightings are not necessarily UFO’s. I’m referencing those that have been discussed and recognised as possible examples of UFO’s

[Dejarma]

Just now, Unusual Tournament said:

Not really, since I’ve clearly stated multiple times that not all UFO/UAP sightings are not necessarily UFO’s.

what one's do you feel are not then? give us an example

[skyeagle409]

2 hours ago, Dejarma said:

so now UAP stands for 'unidentified anomalous phenomena' not 'unidentified aerial phenomena' 

 More like intelligently controlled flying objects whose performance capabilities have been verified by radar, infrared, and other tracking sensors including satellites.

 

 

[Dejarma]

1 minute ago, skyeagle409 said:

 More like intelligently controlled flying objects whose performance capabilities have been verified by radar, infrared, and other tracking sensors including satellites.

 

 

what? so not UAP's then? what is your point? 

[skyeagle409]

16 hours ago, Unusual Tournament said:

US military has been observing ‘metallic orbs’ making extraordinary ‘maneuvers’
 

a key Defense Department official made a striking disclosure. Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick, director of a new UAP analysis office, stated that U.S. military personnel are observing “metallic orbs” “all over the world.” 

 

https://thehill.com/opinion/national-security/4030026-us-military-has-been-observing-metallic-orbs-making-extraordinary-maneuvers/

I find the following accounts from that link very interesting because I have said there have been encounters where the objects have been considered hazardous to flight operations of commercial and military aircraft around the world. I have also said the manner in which they operate is not indicative of the way the military conducts flight operations with its valuable classified aircraft..

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"To be sure, rigorous scientific analysis may ultimately identify a prosaic explanation for such observations. In the meantime, however, such “metallic orbs” are prima facie evidence of extraordinary technology. After all, how would spheres, lacking wings or apparent forms of propulsion, execute “maneuvers” of any kind?" 

"Intriguingly, this profile includes small (3 to 13 feet in diameter) “spherical” objects capable of flight at a range of velocities, from “stationary” to twice the speed of sound, despite a perplexing absence of “thermal exhaust” such as heat from an engine. Of particular note, as Kirkpatrick made clear, some of these highly anomalous characteristics are observed via multiple sensors." 

"While training off the U.S. east coast in 2014-15, Graves and at least 50-60 fellow naval aviators observed unknown objects, frequently via multiple sensors, that remained stationary over the ground even in hurricane-force winds, or traveled at speeds faster than sound."

"According to one such document, Graves’s squadron considered the spheres, which flew with impunity in tightly-controlled training airspace, a “critical risk” and “a severe threat to Naval Aviation.” 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[skyeagle409]

37 minutes ago, Dejarma said:

what? so not UAP's then? what is your point? 

 

My point is, the objects exhibit advanced technology and performance capabilities as confirmed by multiple sensors including satellites, that exclude mankind as the owners of UAPs and let's remember, Congress have referred to UAPs as objects that are not man-made.

 

 

INTELLIGENCE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023

’ Temporary nonattributed objects, or those that are positively identified as man-made after analysis, will be passed to appropriate offices and should not be considered under the definition as unidentified aerospace-undersea phenomena.

https://www.congress.gov/117/crpt/srpt132/CRPT-117srpt132.pdf#page=12

[Dejarma]

12 minutes ago, skyeagle409 said:

My point is,

yeah wonderful, great, fascinating, riveting in fact 

[Golden Duck]

You think you're stating things clearly?

3 hours ago, Unusual Tournament said:

... not all UFO/UAP sightings are not necessarily UFO’s. ...

[skyeagle409]

33 minutes ago, Dejarma said:

yeah wonderful, great, fascinating, riveting in fact 

 Facts are facts, and you can't change that.

[astrobeing]

14 hours ago, skyeagle409 said:

 Facts are facts, and you can't change that.

And facts are what you say they are, right Mr. Sky Eagle?

[preacherman76]

2 hours ago, astrobeing said:

And facts are what you say they are, right Mr. Sky Eagle?

It’s one thing when someone comes in here and tells a personal ufo story. How it ends up on the same par with pentagon officials seems odd. Heck seems worse. 
You guys seem even more aggressive in your response. 

Odder still is accusing sky of, well, I’m not sure exactly what you are insinuating here. It’s almost like you folks get mad because he is using a source that would be credible to many here, if it were any other subject. 
 

 

[skyeagle409]

10 hours ago, astrobeing said:

And facts are what you say they are, right Mr. Sky Eagle?

 

Let's just say that I know enough to differentiate between facts and fantasy. I still remember when the Air Force explained away our UFO sightings over Vietnam in 1968  as enemy helicopters, which we knew was false and the Air Force knew was false as well. 

 

[astrobeing]

9 hours ago, skyeagle409 said:

Let's just say that I know enough to differentiate between facts and fantasy. 

Why would we say that?

9 hours ago, skyeagle409 said:

I still remember when the Air Force explained away our UFO sightings over Vietnam in 1968  as enemy helicopters, which we knew was false and the Air Force knew was false as well.

Obviously the aliens were working for the V.C.

[skyeagle409]

15 hours ago, astrobeing said:

Why would we say that?

Obviously the aliens were working for the V.C.

 

Apparently, not, because the object approached our base from over the sea and did not drop any bombs. However, what better way to convert a UFO skeptic into a believer than to have them witness firsthand what we did in1968. 

 

Edited June 5 by skyeagle409

[Golden Duck]

11 hours ago, skyeagle409 said:

 

Apparently, not, because the object approached our base from over the sea and did not drop any bombs. However, what better way to convert a UFO skeptic into a believer than to have them witness firsthand what we did in1968. 

 

They did it to anoint you as the one chosen to spread the word.

Pretty much cult like doctrine.

[Zebra3]

The orbs are real, that's done, I just want to know what they are.

[astrobeing]

On 6/5/2023 at 12:19 AM, skyeagle409 said:

Apparently, not, because the object approached our base from over the sea and did not drop any bombs.

So they didn't teach you about reconnaissance planes when you were in the military? Well, that's as believable as anything else you say.

[skyeagle409]

23 hours ago, Golden Duck said:

They did it to anoint you as the one chosen to spread the word.

Pretty much cult like doctrine.

 

It presented a pattern that highlights the Air Force's campaign of UFO coverups.