Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -

UFOs 'took control of Russian nukes' and 'entered launch codes'


pellinore

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, Piney said:

That's hypothetical. It doesn't mean technological humanoid aliens exist. Because humanoid aliens are biologically impossible unless Earth has a twin that went through the exact same environmental changes.

It sends a message as to what could happen to civilization as we know it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
21 hours ago, Golden Duck said:

Why should I speculate on your motivation to lie? All the audience needs to know is that "topple" did not come from The Brookings Report being discussed.

Sorry, but your debunking efforts don't work. Now, explain to us the original source as to who wrote "Topple" and what it meant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, skyeagle409 said:

It sends a message as to what could happen to civilization as we know it. 

It certainly does. :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Essan said:


There's a very VERY obvious reason (assuming such images really exist in the first place)

Just not the one you want it to be ;) 

The images exist and anyone who knows how the pod that was attached to the aircraft work, they would know why such images exist. So, what we have are active and passive sensors all focusing on a single target and confirming the object as an intelligently controlled craft. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Trelane said:

Bottom line, that isn't what i had proposed initially and you know it. Go ahead back in the thread to see what I had challenged. You failed and now are trying to change the parameters to save face.(again)

Same old Earl, full of laughs.

And  you can tell some real whoppers.

Here's what you said:
"I'd like examples where there are verifiable and non-hoaxed photos that corroborate statements. Not videos or anything. Photos."

I showed you a PHOTO verified by USAF (Project Bluebook). I told you there were many eyewitnesses, my father included. 

Have a nice day 

Edited by Earl.Of.Trumps
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Earl.Of.Trumps said:

I showed you a PHOTO verified by USAF (Project Bluebook)

verified as what? it was never verified as being <not of this world> what the fek are you talking about!?!

your flawed ridiculous childish logic is really starting to p*** me off now!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Trelane said:

The doom loop continues. 

Let's just say extraterrestrial reality. A multitude of verifiable documentation and data from various credible sources as corroborated by a number of eyewitness accounts, are straight-to-the-point.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Dejarma said:

verified as what? it was never verified as being <not of this world> what the fek are you talking about!?!

your flawed ridiculous childish logic is really starting to p*** me off now!!!

verified as a legit photo.

stay out of this with me, dejarma. your attitude leaves a lot to be desired. 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Earl.Of.Trumps said:

And  you can tell some real whoppers.

Here's what you said:
"I'd like examples where there are verifiable and non-hoaxed photos that corroborate statements. Not videos or anything. Photos."

I showed you a PHOTO verified by USAF (Project Bluebook). I told you there were many eyewitnesses, my father included. 

Have a nice day 

No Earl, you showed a photo that you believed was corroborated by statements. Statements from the person taking the photo. When checked the chap that actually took the photo stated it wasn't.  Swing and a miss Earl.

Where are these alleged statements that correspond to this specific photo? I said statements, that would imply officially documented ones. Maybe I should have been more specific as people think implied is type of plastic bag these days. Also, please spare me the "my daddy saw something." talk. It's pathetic.

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Trelane said:

No Earl, you showed a photo that you believed was corroborated by statements. Statements from the person taking the photo. When checked the chap that actually took the photo stated it wasn't.  Swing and a miss Earl.

I'm tired of repeating this. If the objects in the photo are unidentified, then they are UFO's. Do you know what they are?? 

I win the point.

57 minutes ago, Trelane said:

Where are these alleged statements that correspond to this specific photo? I said statements, that would imply officially documented ones. Maybe I should have been more specific as people think implied is type of plastic bag these days. Also, please spare me the "my daddy saw something." talk. It's pathetic.

You're moving the goal posts dude. 

I am sure you will reword it so that NO photo qualifies. the chicken scrit way out of it. 

nice knowing ya. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Earl.Of.Trumps said:

I'm tired of repeating this. If the objects in the photo are unidentified, then they are UFO's. Do you know what they are?? 

I win the point.

yeah & we're tired of your responses;) unidentified yes! (if the lights were really in the sky flying around of course) ...you DO NOT KNOW THAT for sure, do ya!

BUT= every time you talk in here you ARE deep down suggesting you feel unidentified means <probably aliens> - so NAFF OFF & grow up mate! zzzzzzzzzzz:sleepy:

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.