Ryan Graves: subcommittee revelations were just 'tip of the iceberg'

[skyeagle409]

On 1/3/2024 at 4:02 AM, Trelane said:

Over months 5 later.....still nothing new or groundbreaking. All we get is the same regurgitated stories. 

Actually, additional government officials have been coming forward and revealing what they know about UFOs.

[Hazzard]

22 minutes ago, skyeagle409 said:

Actually, additional government officials have been coming forward and revealing what they know about UFOs.

...and they all have something in common.

All talk. Zero substance.

[skyeagle409]

42 minutes ago, Hazzard said:

...and they all have something in common.

All talk. Zero substance.

Since you missed it, here's the reference.

Dozens Of Government UFO Whistleblowers Have Given Testimony To Congress, Pentagon, And Inspectors General, Say Sources (substack.com)

As Mick West, a prominent skeptic of UFOs, said, “It'd be very interesting. You know, more people saying the same thing independently makes it more likely to be true.”

 

Edited January 7 by skyeagle409

[Hazzard]

2 minutes ago, skyeagle409 said:

 

As Mick West, a prominent skeptic of UFOs, said, “It'd be very interesting. You know, more people saying the same thing independently makes it more likely to be true.”

 

Not necessarily. 

May I remind you of the time when everyone believed in witches... did that make them real?

(Not even to mention religion!)

[skyeagle409]

Just now, Hazzard said:

Not necessarily. 

Those were his words.

Just now, Hazzard said:

May I remind you of the time when everyone believed in witches... did that make them real?

(Not even to mention religion!)

May I remind you we are also talking data and documentation to backs up what they say.

[Hazzard]

5 minutes ago, skyeagle409 said:

 

May I remind you we are also talking data and documentation to backs up what they say.

To bad they all fall really short of even resembling good evidence. 

 

[skyeagle409]

1 minute ago, Hazzard said:

To bad they all fall really short of even resembling good evidence. 

 

Considering the data was scientifically analyzed and verified by experts and documented, and in many cases, corroborated by reliable eyewitnesses, what more is there to say?!

[Resume]

1 hour ago, skyeagle409 said:

what more is there to say?!

But you keep saying it over and over.  If you're so confident in your hypothesis, why don't you put it all in a paper and submit it to reputable relevant  journal rather than vomiting it relentlessly in obscure corners of the interweb?

[skyeagle409]

6 hours ago, Resume said:

But you keep saying it over and over.  If you're so confident in your hypothesis, why don't you put it all in a paper and submit it to reputable relevant  journal rather than vomiting it relentlessly in obscure corners of the interweb?

My hypothesis? How about firsthand experience and knowledge?!

[Hazzard]

14 hours ago, Resume said:

But you keep saying it over and over.  If you're so confident in your hypothesis, why don't you put it all in a paper and submit it to reputable relevant  journal rather than vomiting it relentlessly in obscure corners of the interweb?

Skyeagle going public with his nonsense is something I would pay big money to see.    

 

Edited January 8 by Hazzard

[Resume]

9 hours ago, skyeagle409 said:

My hypothesis? How about firsthand experience and knowledge?!

You're quite right, calling the turds you attempt to polish and deposit here are a far cry from a scientific hypothesis.

What I mean is to assemble all the stories, anecdotes, claims, interpretations of other's sightings and "data," roll it into a paper worthy of publication in periodicals like the Journal of Aerospace Engineering or AIAA Journal  or Acta Astronautica; see what the experts there have so say about your claim that AliEnzz is here.

Let us know how you fare.

[Resume]

2 hours ago, Hazzard said:

Skyeagle going public with his nonsense is something I would pay big money to see.    

 

I don't think he can, if you know what I mean.*

 

*nudge, nudge.

[astrobeing]

11 hours ago, skyeagle409 said:

My hypothesis? How about firsthand experience and knowledge?!

The last time I bothered to listen to your firsthand experience you concluded that something you saw in the sky in Vietnam was a flying saucer from outer space simply because it didn't shoot at you.

That's when I stopped listening to you.

[Antigonos]

1 hour ago, astrobeing said:

The last time I bothered to listen to your firsthand experience you concluded that something you saw in the sky in Vietnam was a flying saucer from outer space simply because it didn't shoot at you.

That's when I stopped listening to you.

 

[skyeagle409]

2 hours ago, astrobeing said:

The last time I bothered to listen to your firsthand experience you concluded that something you saw in the sky in Vietnam was a flying saucer from outer space simply because it didn't shoot at you.

That's when I stopped listening to you.

 It couldn't have been a helicopter because the communist did not have helicopters where I was stationed, and it was visually obvious the object was not a helicopter. UFOs were seen across Vietnam during the war that had nothing to do with enemy helicopters. In case you missed it, check out these links.

UFOs during the Vietnam War - Openminds.tv

1966 UFO incident in Nha Trang, South Vietnam (thinkaboutitdocs.com)