Could extraterrestrial visitors try to contact an artificial intelligence ?

[Golden Duck]

1 hour ago, Earl.Of.Trumps said:

You misconstrued. I'm really concerned about what was  happening in the universe before our solar system was created. I use our recent emergence is a marker.

The universe was 9.3 billion years old before our solar system was created. What was going on in the universe up until that point in time? 
I think the answer is obvious. Planets had been growing living organisms all the while, some, with intelligent life. How many...? All I can say is, not zero.
You'll be happy to know that scientists now think that there are 300,000,000 planets in the Milky Way galaxy that can support life. Amazing, huh?

In those 9.3 billion years you could say the elements that form solar systems were being formed.

Time and gravity is needed to make lighter element fuse into heavier elements.

Edited September 10 by Golden Duck

[skyeagle409]

On 9/9/2023 at 1:28 PM, Phantom309 said:

New information from an Air Force General.

Looks like those objects can blink in/out of our existence at will...and they posulate these "creatures" are synthetic bio based with a high AI component:

 

 

 High-ranking military and intelligence officials, scientist, engineers, pilots and radar operators around the world have stated for decades that UFOs are not of this earth.

[skyeagle409]

On 9/5/2023 at 7:28 PM, joc said:

UFOs in the atmosphere?  There isn't any evidence of that either.    

I have noticed that you have ignored the documented and verifiable collection of official data evidence and government documentation from military and intelligence sources around the world that proves you are incorrect.

Edited September 11 by skyeagle409

[Trelane]

On 9/10/2023 at 10:17 PM, skyeagle409 said:

 High-ranking military and intelligence officials, scientist, engineers, pilots and radar operators around the world have stated for decades that UFOs are not of this earth.

Name one "high ranking" flag officer who was or currently is in position to make such a claim. Oh, that's right, what am I thinking? You can't. 

[Trelane]

On 9/10/2023 at 10:24 PM, skyeagle409 said:

I have noticed that you have ignored the documented and verifiable collection of official data evidence and government documentation from military and intelligence sources around the world that proves you are incorrect.

I have noticed that you don't actually have access to the documents and collected data that was verified to make such a claim. Military and government sources have explained what you've alluded to. Swing and a miss. 

[skyeagle409]

17 minutes ago, Trelane said:

Name one "high ranking" flag officer who was or currently is in position to make such a claim. Oh, that's right, what am I thinking? You can't. 

Let's take at least two, beginning with Arthur E. Exon, former commander of Wright-Patterson AFB. He said:

What Roswell Was

(RUCU) (C&S, p. 191, 194)

"...They knew they had something new in their hands.  The metal and material was unknown to anyone I talked to.  Whatever they found, I never heard what the results were.  A couple of guys thought it might be Russian, but the overall consensus was that the pieces were from space.  Everyone from the White House on down knew that what we had found was not of this world within 24 hours of our finding it.  ...Roswell was the recovery of a craft from space."

 

 

Rear Adm. D.S. Fahrney
Former Navy missile chief (circa 1956):

WASHINGTON AP - Retired Rear Adm. Delmer S. Fahrney, once head of the Navy's guided missile program, said Wednesday reliable reports indicate that "there are objects coming into our atmosphere at very high speeds. Fahrney told a news conference that "no agency in this country or Russia is able to duplicate at this time the speeds and accelerations which radar and observers indicate these flying objects are able to achieve."]

 

Edited September 12 by skyeagle409

[skyeagle409]

15 minutes ago, Trelane said:

I have noticed that you don't actually have access to the documents and collected data that was verified to make such a claim. Military and government sources have explained what you've alluded to. Swing and a miss. 

Just to let you know that I am aware that you are aware the documents I have been posting are available to anyone under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), and from the websites of the CIA, FBI, NSA, and DoD.

[Trelane]

1 hour ago, skyeagle409 said:

Let's take at least two, beginning with Arthur E. Exon, former commander of Wright-Patterson AFB. He said:

What Roswell Was

(RUCU) (C&S, p. 191, 194)

"...They knew they had something new in their hands.  The metal and material was unknown to anyone I talked to.  Whatever they found, I never heard what the results were.  A couple of guys thought it might be Russian, but the overall consensus was that the pieces were from space.  Everyone from the White House on down knew that what we had found was not of this world within 24 hours of our finding it.  ...Roswell was the recovery of a craft from space."

 

 

Rear Adm. D.S. Fahrney
Former Navy missile chief (circa 1956):

WASHINGTON AP - Retired Rear Adm. Delmer S. Fahrney, once head of the Navy's guided missile program, said Wednesday reliable reports indicate that "there are objects coming into our atmosphere at very high speeds. Fahrney told a news conference that "no agency in this country or Russia is able to duplicate at this time the speeds and accelerations which radar and observers indicate these flying objects are able to achieve."]

 

 A quote from a retiree isn't what I asked for Sky and you know that, nice try I guess. Something from someone that was in the office and rank at the time of the comment or currently serving. Don't bother, there aren't any.

[Trelane]

1 hour ago, skyeagle409 said:

Just to let you know that I am aware that you are aware the documents I have been posting are available to anyone under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), and from the websites of the CIA, FBI, NSA, and DoD.

not everything you copy and pasted was released under FOIA and you know that. Quotes alluding to FOIA documents are NOT FOIA documents. You continue to mislead and lie and further discredit yourself to others. I on the other hand, have dismissed you as a liar and fraud months ago. Back to the land of ignore with you.

[Hankenhunter]

9 hours ago, skyeagle409 said:

Just to let you know that I am aware that you are aware the documents I have been posting are available to anyone under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), and from the websites of the CIA, FBI, NSA, and DoD.

I'm starting to believe that the majority of sightings are drones. The big ones though are another matter.

I also believe it's possible that building, and setting off a nukes on earth, and in space is what attracted them. Perhaps they'll announce themselves when we can prove that humans aren't a lunatic species. 

[skyeagle409]

10 hours ago, Trelane said:

Name one "high ranking" flag officer who was or currently is in position to make such a claim. Oh, that's right, what am I thinking? You can't. 

I wanted to name the commanding officer of Wright-Patterson AFB. Remember, Wright-Patterson AFB is where alien bodies and crash wreckage were taken and confirmed and why Senator Barry Goldwater had requested access to view the alien bodies and wreckage at Wright-Patterson AFB..

HOW SCIENTISTS TRACKED A FLYING SAUCER
by
Commander Robert B. McLaughlin, USN

http://www.nicap.org/true-mc.htm

 

SCIENTIST ADMITS TO STUDY OF ROSWELL CRASH DEBRIS!
(Confirmed by FOIA Document) 
A research study that has recently been obtained through FOIA offers stunning confirmation that Wright-Patterson Air Force base contracted Battelle Memorial Institute to analyze material from a crashed UFO at Roswell in 1947.

 

Just to let you know that General Arthur E. Exon was in a position to know what was going on given the fact he was also the Air Force officer who overflew the Roswell crash area and confirmed not one, but two craft sites. 

\

 

 

 

 

Now, you know the rest of the story.

Edited September 13 by skyeagle409

[skyeagle409]

8 hours ago, Trelane said:

not everything you copy and pasted was released under FOIA and you know that. Quotes alluding to FOIA documents are NOT FOIA documents. You continue to mislead and lie and further discredit yourself to others. I on the other hand, have dismissed you as a liar and fraud months ago. Back to the land of ignore with you.

It doesn't matter whether they are my documents or not as long the such documents and data are accurate and factual. Seems you've played that right out of the skeptic's playbook. You might want to go to this link and check out Sections III and XVIII. 

https://skepticalaboutskeptics.org/examining-skeptics/daniel-drasin-zen-and-the-art-of-debunkery/

Remember, I have even challenged you and others to  prove me wrong by providing man-made evidence that refutes my claims related to what the documentation and data depicted, which of course depicts nothing built by the hands of mankind. Seems that you have no evidence that refutes my extraterrestrial claims, which explains why my challenge has gone unchallenged.

 

 

 

Edited September 13 by skyeagle409

[skyeagle409]

57 minutes ago, Hankenhunter said:

I'm starting to believe that the majority of sightings are drones. The big ones though are another matter.

I also believe it's possible that building, and setting off a nukes on earth, and in space is what attracted them. Perhaps they'll announce themselves when we can prove that humans aren't a lunatic species. 

No doubt that some smaller objects could very well be drones and I am on the record as stating that the majority of UFO reports can be explained in down-to-earth terms. The objects that I am very interested in are those that are much larger than any drone flying today and capable of right-angles maneuvers at hypersonic speeds without producing sonic booms.

[Hankenhunter]

15 minutes ago, skyeagle409 said:

No doubt that some smaller objects could very well be drones and I am on the record as stating that the majority of UFO reports can be explained in down-to-earth terms. The objects that I am very interested in are those that are much larger than any drone flying today and capable of right-angles maneuvers at hypersonic speeds without producing sonic booms.

Sorry, I should have said ET drones. 

Curious as to whether human made drones can survive the stresses that the unknown drones are capable of? Including flying at high speeds then entering water effortlessly. I'm not an engineer so I'm throwing this out here.

Edited September 13 by Hankenhunter
Clarity