Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -

Congress 'intrigued' by UFO testimonies, says Jeff Duncan


UM-Bot

Recommended Posts

 

I bet they're intrigued. 

They should be.  But will they have any luck in breaking through the shell, (if it exists)?

 

I don't expect the vast majority of those in government circles have any relevant access or exposure to this topic.  It will be (if it's true) entirely new to them.  If it is true, then the system already put in place to regulate and control this topic seemingly abides among those who do not occupy any elected position, and whose power and influece is derived outside the process of elections or if they do and are one of the few elected who've been read in, they've been exceedingly and carefully vetted to fit the mode of one who can engage without upsetting the overriding MO of the structure as it abides.

Sure is interesting to watch this unfold however.  I find I'm more and more occupying the enviable position in life of being able to encounter new or strange information without the compulsion to instantly form an opinion of for or against.  I'll continue to follow information on the topic and see what arises.  If nothing else, it's an engaging way to pass a few hours from time to time.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, quiXilver said:

I bet they're intrigued. 

They should be.  But will they have any luck in breaking through the shell, (if it exists)?

 

I'll tell ya, if this story keeps circulating, it would seem to indicate that there will be more to come on this story.

Let's see if they can make a just conclusion, one way or the other. I'm tired of suspense, ya know?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

An older saying goes like " ain't smoke without fire "...

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I recently encountered an intriguing interview with Ph.D Avi Loeb, whom I believe was head of Astronomy at Harvard (past or perhaps still present).  He was a surprising entrant into the SETI debate on the side of more funding for sincere exploration into other avenues of possible discovery aside from the rather simplistic radio observations currently used and his entry was a shock to many in the field given his status as a stout and strict minded scientist.

His promptings and involvement came after his exploration of gathered data of the Oumouamoua fly by in 2017 and the intriguing aspects of the more anomolous aspects of that object.  He's a seemingly highly respected member of his field who's published over 700 peer reviewed papers and several books, some of which have prompted several private billionaire investors to reach out to him offering funding to institute some of his proposed methods for seeking out other such potential objects in our region of space. 

He struck me as a dedicated scientist who is open to following data, even if it leads in an unconventional direction.  A particularly potent trait for one seemingly so entrenched within the structure of what is often a highly dogmatic arena of modern scientism that seems so rife in academia.

Edited by quiXilver
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, quiXilver said:

I recently encountered an intriguing interview with Ph.D Avi Loeb, whom I believe was head of Astronomy at Harvard (past or perhaps still present).  He was a surprising entrant into the SETI debate on the side of more funding for sincere exploration into other avenues of possible discovery aside from the rather simplistic radio observations currently used and his entry was a shock to many in the field given his status as a stout and strict minded scientist.

His promptings and involvement came after his exploration of gathered data of the Oumouamoua fly by in 2017 and the intriguing aspects of the more anomolous aspects of that object.  He's a seemingly highly respected member of his field who's published over 700 peer reviewed papers and several books, some of which have prompted several private billionaire investors to reach out to him offering funding to institute some of his proposed methods for seeking out other such potential objects in our region of space. 

He struck me as a dedicated scientist who is open to following data, even if it leads in an unconventional direction.  A particularly potent trait for one seemingly so entrenched within the structure of what is often a highly dogmatic arena of modern scientism that seems so rife in academia.


Avi Loeb is unconventional, to say the least. I think he likes the notoriety, and I look at some of his stances as not realistic, and he is just buffing his brand. 
For example, he went looking for pieces from that meteor that hit the Pacific a while back, and expected to find a UFO that crashed. Pheeew. 
As luck would have it, the particles he recovered were not from this solar system. yeah, so. I still like the guy, but... 

 

 

Edited by Earl.Of.Trumps
reword
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.