docyabut2 Posted September 26 #1 Share Posted September 26 https://www.foxnews.com/politics/biden-nearly-stumbles-exiting-air-force-one-hours-exposed-efforts-team-prevent-falls 1 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
docyabut2 Posted September 26 Author #2 Share Posted September 26 (edited) He `s not going to make it another year with out falling Edited September 26 by docyabut2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
docyabut2 Posted September 26 Author #3 Share Posted September 26 As of June 2023, it appears that Biden has fallen or tripped at least eight times since winning the 2020 election. https://www.google.com/search?q=Biden+fell+so+many+times&rlz=1C1GGGE_enUS631US633&oq=Biden+fell+so+many+times+&aqs=chrome..69i57j33i160l3j33i299l2.25574j1j15&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8 4 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+and-then Posted September 26 #4 Share Posted September 26 His handlers should be charged with malfeasance and elder abuse when he falls and is seriously injured. It's just a matter of time, now. 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+joc Posted September 26 #5 Share Posted September 26 He's trippy alright! 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kenemet Posted September 26 #6 Share Posted September 26 18 minutes ago, docyabut2 said: As of June 2023, it appears that Biden has fallen or tripped at least eight times since winning the 2020 election. https://www.google.com/search?q=Biden+fell+so+many+times&rlz=1C1GGGE_enUS631US633&oq=Biden+fell+so+many+times+&aqs=chrome..69i57j33i160l3j33i299l2.25574j1j15&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8 That's fewer than I've had. 2 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psyche101 Posted September 26 #7 Share Posted September 26 7 minutes ago, and-then said: His handlers should be charged with malfeasance and elder abuse when he falls and is seriously injured. It's just a matter of time, now. What.... the big guy criminal mastermind?? Seems contradictory.... 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+razman Posted September 26 #8 Share Posted September 26 They make a much bigger deal out of it than it is , typical. Thats what they been doing all along. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+and-then Posted September 27 #9 Share Posted September 27 11 minutes ago, razman said: They make a much bigger deal out of it than it is , typical. Thats what they been doing all along. This time it's his own handlers saying they're concerned. People who would vote for Tater next year don't care about this nation's future at all. Frankly, I hope he refuses to step down. Let him be the real face of the party. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+razman Posted September 27 #10 Share Posted September 27 (edited) 8 minutes ago, and-then said: This time it's his own handlers saying they're concerned. People who would vote for Tater next year don't care about this nation's future at all. Frankly, I hope he refuses to step down. Let him be the real face of the party. He's got spinal arthritis , they're working on it. I do still think they should run someone else beside him though , with all his bad press on his age. They should have started grooming someone in a long while ago. Edited September 27 by razman 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+razman Posted September 27 #11 Share Posted September 27 6 minutes ago, and-then said: People who would vote for Tater next year don't care about this nation's future at all I think it's really not him running the show , but his whole team. 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psyche101 Posted September 27 #12 Share Posted September 27 21 minutes ago, and-then said: This time it's his own handlers saying they're concerned. People who would vote for Tater next year don't care about this nation's future at all. Frankly, I hope he refuses to step down. Let him be the real face of the party. 4 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grim Reaper 6 Posted September 27 #13 Share Posted September 27 49 minutes ago, joc said: He's trippy alright! Yea, that’s certainly true Biden is a Day Tripper! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grim Reaper 6 Posted September 27 #14 Share Posted September 27 50 minutes ago, Kenemet said: That's fewer than I've had. Me too! 3 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Earl.Of.Trumps Posted September 27 #15 Share Posted September 27 39 minutes ago, razman said: They make a much bigger deal out of it than it is , typical. Thats what they been doing all along. Please, razman. If this was a lone incident, it would be no cause for alarm. But here, even the democrats are worried about Joe's frailty. And-then is right, too, his handlers are not protecting Joe like they should. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+and-then Posted September 27 #16 Share Posted September 27 30 minutes ago, razman said: I think it's really not him running the show , but his whole team. Hence my tagline question... I'm amazed that no one is even asking the question publicly. A man his age with let's face it, obvious signs of creeping dementia, and physical deficits as well, cannot be expected to be on call for such a planet-altering decision in what might certainly be a last-minute decision about whether to return a nuclear attack. Now, I don't imagine he's totally out of the loop, but I'd bet my life he won't be the one actually making the decision. IF he IS totally in control of such a decision then God help us all... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kenemet Posted September 27 #17 Share Posted September 27 54 minutes ago, Earl.Of.Trumps said: Please, razman. If this was a lone incident, it would be no cause for alarm. But here, even the democrats are worried about Joe's frailty. And-then is right, too, his handlers are not protecting Joe like they should. Eight stumbles in three years and he's frail? EIGHT? In THREE YEARS? I think that's about average (or perhaps less) than the average adult human has. 4 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kenemet Posted September 27 #18 Share Posted September 27 46 minutes ago, and-then said: Hence my tagline question... I'm amazed that no one is even asking the question publicly. A man his age with let's face it, obvious signs of creeping dementia, and physical deficits as well, cannot be expected to be on call for such a planet-altering decision in what might certainly be a last-minute decision about whether to return a nuclear attack. Now, I don't imagine he's totally out of the loop, but I'd bet my life he won't be the one actually making the decision. IF he IS totally in control of such a decision then God help us all... EIGHT stumbles in THREE years means "dementia"? Physical defects?? "Not in control of anything?" That's less than three stumbles per year. At that metric as a diagnosis, I believe the entire population of the planet will be classified as demneted with physical defects and unable to string together a reasonable plan for anything. 5 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Earl.Of.Trumps Posted September 27 #19 Share Posted September 27 1 hour ago, Kenemet said: Eight stumbles in three years and he's frail? EIGHT? In THREE YEARS? I think that's about average (or perhaps less) than the average adult human has. I don't know, Kenemet, I certainly have not fallen 8 times in the last 2.5 years. I don't think many people do, except you, and even that's pro'ly just the Chardonnet 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+razman Posted September 27 #20 Share Posted September 27 1 hour ago, Kenemet said: EIGHT stumbles in THREE years means "dementia"? Physical defects?? "Not in control of anything?" That's less than three stumbles per year. At that metric as a diagnosis, I believe the entire population of the planet will be classified as demneted with physical defects and unable to string together a reasonable plan for anything. Yea , i think its just the media looking for any kind of stumble or anything they can use to dramatize the situation , thus making a bigger thing out of it. I mean , the guy's got a lot on his mind and a lot going on around him. The Biden administration has done quite a lot in the last couple years as well , passing bills and such. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+razman Posted September 27 #21 Share Posted September 27 2 hours ago, Earl.Of.Trumps said: Please, razman. If this was a lone incident, it would be no cause for alarm. But here, even the democrats are worried about Joe's frailty. And-then is right, too, his handlers are not protecting Joe like they should. Yea i'm sure he don't quite move like he used to at his age , though even the stumble that this thread is about was more of a quick misstep. Your getting off a large plane and going down some steps. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kenemet Posted September 27 #22 Share Posted September 27 17 minutes ago, Earl.Of.Trumps said: I don't know, Kenemet, I certainly have not fallen 8 times in the last 2.5 years. I don't think many people do, except you, and even that's pro'ly just the Chardonnet You never stumbled on an uneven surface or got distracted and tripped? Maybe I'm just unusually clumsy, but I do think I've tripped more than once per year. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shadowsfall Posted September 27 #23 Share Posted September 27 37 minutes ago, Earl.Of.Trumps said: I don't know, Kenemet, I certainly have not fallen 8 times in the last 2.5 years. I don't think many people do, except you, and even that's pro'ly just the Chardonnet Geez I don’t know standing up quickly these days can give me a buzz if u get my drift.., 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+razman Posted September 27 #24 Share Posted September 27 10 hours ago, and-then said: Hence my tagline question... I'm amazed that no one is even asking the question publicly. A man his age with let's face it, obvious signs of creeping dementia, and physical deficits as well, cannot be expected to be on call for such a planet-altering decision in what might certainly be a last-minute decision about whether to return a nuclear attack. Now, I don't imagine he's totally out of the loop, but I'd bet my life he won't be the one actually making the decision. IF he IS totally in control of such a decision then God help us all... I'm not sure exactly how that works , as far as i know there's not any one man that makes that kind of decision , but a chain of command kind of thing. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buzz_Light_Year Posted September 27 #25 Share Posted September 27 10 hours ago, Kenemet said: EIGHT stumbles in THREE years means "dementia"? Physical defects?? "Not in control of anything?" That's less than three stumbles per year. At that metric as a diagnosis, I believe the entire population of the planet will be classified as demneted with physical defects and unable to string together a reasonable plan for anything. Those are just the ones caught on camera, who knows what happens off camera. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now