Just 6 Percent of New S&P Jobs Went to White Applicants in wake of George Floyd riots

[WVK]

The analysis, based on data reported to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, shows that S&P 100 companies added 323,094 new jobs between 2020 and 2021. Of that total, 302,570 of them—94 percent of the total increase—went to "people of color," defined as blacks, Asians, and Hispanics, the analysis found. Together, those groups make up just 40 percent of the U.S population.

https://freebeacon.com/latest-news/just-6-percent-of-new-sp-jobs-went-to-white-applicants-in-the-wake-of-george-floyd-analysis-shows/

 

[Edumakated]

9 minutes ago, WVK said:

The analysis, based on data reported to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, shows that S&P 100 companies added 323,094 new jobs between 2020 and 2021. Of that total, 302,570 of them—94 percent of the total increase—went to "people of color," defined as blacks, Asians, and Hispanics, the analysis found. Together, those groups make up just 40 percent of the U.S population.

https://freebeacon.com/latest-news/just-6-percent-of-new-sp-jobs-went-to-white-applicants-in-the-wake-of-george-floyd-analysis-shows/

 

Gotta call BS on this one.

The real story is most of the job growth is probably in warehouse positions, not corporate white collar jobs.  Minorities are more likely to be in those warehouse positions.  Amazon is part of the S&P and their warehouses have driven a lot of the job growth.

[Gromdor]

2 minutes ago, Edumakated said:

Gotta call BS on this one.

The real story is most of the job growth is probably in warehouse positions, not corporate white collar jobs.  Minorities are more likely to be in those warehouse positions.  Amazon is part of the S&P and their warehouses have driven a lot of the job growth.

It's true, but you are not wrong either.  

I looked up the analysis and it had a break down by category:

1 Executives- Hired more whites than any other group at +1.13k

2 Managers-  Asians were the winners at +11.6k

3 Professionals- Asians again at +41k

4 Less Senor roles (sales, laborer, service worker)- Hispanics at +106K (Blacks next at +50.8k)

The study is on one of those sites that won't let you copy and paste the article so I can't link it.

[Edumakated]

38 minutes ago, Gromdor said:

It's true, but you are not wrong either.  

I looked up the analysis and it had a break down by category:

1 Executives- Hired more whites than any other group at +1.13k

2 Managers-  Asians were the winners at +11.6k

3 Professionals- Asians again at +41k

4 Less Senor roles (sales, laborer, service worker)- Hispanics at +106K (Blacks next at +50.8k)

The study is on one of those sites that won't let you copy and paste the article so I can't link it.

We agree (I guess pigs are flying).  This was my point, most of the growth is in lower-level positions and thus statistically are more likely to be minorities.  This article is conservative propaganda in the same vein as a lot of the liberal propaganda.  It is designed to make it seem like whites are purposely not being hired when in fact it is just because the jobs are lower level and more likely to be filled by minorities.

Edited September 27 by Edumakated

[odas]

21 minutes ago, Edumakated said:

We agree (I guess pigs are flying).  This was my point, most of the growth is in lower-level positions and thus statistically are more likely to be minorities.  This article is conservative propaganda in the same vein as a lot of the liberal propaganda.  It is designed to make it seem like whites are purposely not being hired when in fact it is just because the jobs are lower level and more likely to be filled by minorities.

Cudos to your posts. Indeed they are flying now.