Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -

Stonehenge study upends a 100-year-old theory and suggests further discoveries to come


Waspie_Dwarf

Recommended Posts

 

Old Red Sandstone on the Old Red Continent. 

Interesting. I had vaguely known that there was difference between the stones used, but this freshened up the matter for me. If it was up to me, I'd make my monolithic altar stone be of igneous origin. But that's clearly not what the builders wanted!

Also, a little off topic, but I found this a few months ago and wanted to let others know about it:

Stonehenge Memorial | Maryhill Museum of Art | Maryhill WA

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Waspie_Dwarf said:

Stonehenge study upends a 100-year-old theory and suggests further discoveries to come

 

Thanks for sharing, IMO this is an amazing new discovery.

Thanks again I really enjoyed this article!:tu:

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Doc Socks Junior said:

Old Red Sandstone on the Old Red Continent. 

Interesting. I had vaguely known that there was difference between the stones used, but this freshened up the matter for me. If it was up to me, I'd make my monolithic altar stone be of igneous origin. But that's clearly not what the builders wanted!

Also, a little off topic, but I found this a few months ago and wanted to let others know about it:

Stonehenge Memorial | Maryhill Museum of Art | Maryhill WA

A greenstone belt altar polished with marl sands to make it greenier. :yes:

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Piney said:

A greenstone belt altar polished with marl sands to make it greenier. :yes:

So that how they their alter stand out and shine, that's really cool.

Thanks for sharing, Piney, I appreciate all the knowledge you share man!:tu:

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Grim Reaper 6 said:

So that how they their alter stand out and shine, that's really cool.

Thanks for sharing, Piney, I appreciate all the knowledge you share man!:tu:

Sand is the usual polish. The marl part was a geology joke. 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Piney said:

Sand is the usual polish. The marl part was a geology joke. 

More than just the geology... 

Quote

[01:00"33]

Beyond the stones, 35th anniversary 

~

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Piney said:

Sand is the usual polish. The marl part was a geology joke. 

Well, I don't have enough knowledge on the subject to disagree, but I appreciate the fact you clarified this!:)

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SHaYap said:

More than just the geology... 

Beyond the stones, 35th anniversary 

~

Wow, thank you for sharing!:tu:

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Grim Reaper 6 said:

Well, I don't have enough knowledge on the subject to disagree, but I appreciate the fact you clarified this!:)

Let me explain the joke. The Greenstone Belt is igneous, which is what Doc said he preferred. It runs in the Northern U.S and Canada. Great polished axe material. Marls are that green to grey clay found around coasts. 

 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Piney said:

Let me explain the joke. The Greenstone Belt is igneous, which is what Doc said he preferred. It runs in the Northern U.S and Canada. Great polished axe material. Marls are that green to grey clay found around coasts. 

 

I get it, that's funny!!:D

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Piney said:

A greenstone belt altar polished with marl sands to make it greenier. :yes:

Incipient oceanic crust. Heck yeah I do love some greenstone belts.

Would make a nice contrast with the red of blood as well, very Christmas-y. Did they do animal sacrifice at Stonehenge?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
44 minutes ago, Doc Socks Junior said:

Did they do animal sacrifice at Stonehenge?

When the Beaker Folk came in and killed off the original builders they probably did.

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/3/2023 at 9:46 AM, Piney said:

When the Beaker Folk came in and killed off the original builders they probably did.

Beakers of blood?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/3/2023 at 6:46 PM, Piney said:

When the Beaker Folk came in and killed off the original builders they probably did.

Did the Beaker Folk really kill the original builders?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, Abramelin said:

Did the Beaker Folk really kill the original builders?

They did or diseases they brought. There was a complete overturn of the gene pool.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.