Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -

Warning Signs of Christ's Second Coming


Grim Reaper 6

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, XenoFish said:

Will has repeatedly preached his space jesus religion. It isn't that he believes, it's the forced expectation that others should too. Or else.

I have not seen that.  I have seen people insulting him without making an argument.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, OverSword said:

I have not seen that.  I have seen people insulting him without making an argument.

I don't care enough about him to bother anymore. I let others handle him. As for insulting him, the word "frustrating" comes to mind. He can be that very much.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, XenoFish said:

I don't care enough about him to bother anymore. I let others handle him. As for insulting him, the word "frustrating" comes to mind. He can be that very much.

That’s an understatement. I see it like this, I explained my take on things and if Will’s not intelligent enough to understand what I said without twisting it into something I most definitely didn’t say or think THAT’S ON HIM.  And for anyone else to come out of the woodwork to defend his stupidity is just mind-boggling IMO. 
 

cormac

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, OverSword said:

I'm not sure what spiritual comprehension is but I assume it's like faith then why bother arguing about it with people who it seems are bullying you simply for the way you feel about something?  Are they worth it? They seem to have an irrational hostility toward you or probably Christianity.  I wonder, would they treat a Hindu with such vehemence if they were on here speaking about why they have belief in their religion?  I doubt it sincerely.  

Read my blog on the Urantia Book. 

Then shut the **** up....

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, XenoFish said:

I don't care enough about him to bother anymore. I let others handle him. As for insulting him, the word "frustrating" comes to mind. He can be that very much.

Only if you want to keep engaging him to the point of name calling.  Reading his responses is like reading someone that believes faith is proof (which it's not) reading some of the responses to him delves into the realm of 12 year old's cyber bullying

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Piney said:

Read my blog on the Urantia Book. 

Then shut the **** up....

I have yet to read anyone's blogs on here and never heard of the Urantia Book.  I notice it's not about Hinduism ;)

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, OverSword said:

Only if you want to keep engaging him to the point of name calling.  Reading his responses is like reading someone that believes faith is proof (which it's not) reading some of the responses to him delves into the realm of 12 year old's cyber bullying

People get tired of preaching that devolves into bi-polar personal attacks. 

  • Thanks 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, OverSword said:

I have yet to read anyone's blogs on here and never heard of the Urantia Book.  I notice it's not about Hinduism ;)

I might be wrong but it's like a prototype of scientology.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, OverSword said:

I have yet to read anyone's blogs on here and never heard of the Urantia Book.  I notice it's not about Hinduism ;)

A racist ex Seventh-Day Adventist went on to found a racist and anti-science UFO cult. 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, XenoFish said:

I might be wrong but it's like a prototype of scientology.

Hubbard robbed Sadler as much as he robbed the Mormons. 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, OverSword said:

Only if you want to keep engaging him to the point of name calling.  Reading his responses is like reading someone that believes faith is proof (which it's not) reading some of the responses to him delves into the realm of 12 year old's cyber bullying

Like I stated, I just don't care any longer. I've had enough of the runaround. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Piney said:

Hubbard robbed Sadler as much as he robbed the Mormons. 

I knew it was a convoluted some-thing-another. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Piney said:

People get tired of preaching that devolves into bi-polar personal attacks. 

That's fair and I don't spend a ton of time in the religious section but just what I was reading on this thread the personal attacks weren't coming from him.  One thing I try to keep in mind is that a person may be bi-polar, schizophrenic, have autism, be a child, etc. online when I'm talking to them.  I've seen what I think were little kids trying to talk about UFO's on here before being talked to by people I know are adults in ways you should never talk to a young person trying to figure stuff out.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, OverSword said:

That's fair and I don't spend a ton of time in the religious section but just what I was reading on this thread the personal attacks weren't coming from him.  One thing I try to keep in mind is that a person may be bi-polar, schizophrenic, have autism, be a child, etc. online when I'm talking to them.  I've seen what I think were little kids trying to talk about UFO's on here before being talked to by people I know are adults in ways you should never talk to a young person trying to figure stuff out.

It's not just a reactive thing. It's often the approach the other person makes that contributes to an actually productive discussion. I know of a few threads I really enjoyed. All because the believer approached the topic thoughtfully. I miss those threads. 

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, OverSword said:

That's fair and I don't spend a ton of time in the religious section but just what I was reading on this thread the personal attacks weren't coming from him.  One thing I try to keep in mind is that a person may be bi-polar, schizophrenic, have autism, be a child, etc. online when I'm talking to them.  I've seen what I think were little kids trying to talk about UFO's on here before being talked to by people I know are adults in ways you should never talk to a young person trying to figure stuff out.

 

Somebody goes on to say, you know who he is, that there is absolutely nothing that is comprehensible about God.

Then that person goes on to say that God is the creator. So in other words, he comprehends it.

That's all. Just pointing out hypocrisy. It's about all I do these days. And they really don't like it when I do it. That's when they go there with the vitriol. In this discussion from yesterday I haven't said anything that borders on preaching.  I haven't made any statements about what I believe, would should be believed, nothing about religion at all.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, OverSword said:

That's fair and I don't spend a ton of time in the religious section but just what I was reading on this thread the personal attacks weren't coming from him.  One thing I try to keep in mind is that a person may be bi-polar, schizophrenic, have autism, be a child, etc. online when I'm talking to them.  I've seen what I think were little kids trying to talk about UFO's on here before being talked to by people I know are adults in ways you should never talk to a young person trying to figure stuff out.

I have autism. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Will Due said:

Somebody goes on to say, you know who he is, that there is absolutely nothing that is comprehensible about God.

Then that person goes on to say that God is the creator. So in other words, he comprehends it.

That's all. Just pointing out hypocrisy. It's about all I do these days. And they really don't like it when I do it. That's when they go there with the vitriol. In this discussion from yesterday I haven't said anything that borders on preaching.  I haven't made any statements about what I believe, would should be believed, nothing about religion at all.

So reading comprehension is not your strong suit. I said before that I try to steer clear of using the word God when it comes to my beliefs as it comes with its own load of religious baggage. And Creator and Deity are just words NOT names so you really have no argument. 
 

cormac

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, cormac mac airt said:

So reading comprehension is not your strong suit. I said before that I try to steer clear of using the word God when it comes to my beliefs as it comes with its own load of religious baggage. And Creator and Deity are just words NOT names so you really have no argument. 
 

cormac

 

But whatever you call it, you comprehend that it's the creator. 

Don't you see the contradiction?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Will Due said:

But whatever you call it, you comprehend that it's the creator. 

Don't you see the contradiction?

There is no contradiction as Creator has no religious connotation whatsoever nor is it religiously defined, as opposed to the baggage you believe in. 
 

cormac

Edited by cormac mac airt
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, cormac mac airt said:

There is no contradiction as it has no religious connotation whatsoever nor is it religiously defined, as opposed to the baggage you believe in. 
 

cormac

 

Then if what you believe has no religious connotation whatsoever, stop telling everyone that they can't comprehend what you so clearly do.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Will Due said:

Then if what you believe has no religious connotation whatsoever, stop telling everyone that they can't comprehend what you so clearly do.

Sure, just as soon as you can provide verifiable evidence of what constitutes existence and its comprehensibility, including a Creator, beyond our 4D universe. The ball is forever in your court. Good luck! 
 

cormac

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, cormac mac airt said:

Sure, just as soon as you can provide verifiable evidence of what constitutes existence and its comprehensibility, including a Creator, beyond our 4D universe. The ball is forever in your court. Good luck! 
 

cormac

 

The onus is on you. Your claim is that there's a creator. So provide verifiable evidence that there is a creator.

That's all.

 

 

 

Edited by Will Due
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Will Due said:

The onus is on you. Your claim is that there's a creator. So provide verifiable evidence that there is a creator.

Creator is just a word. Something pre-existed, whatever that ultimately means, our universe. There is neither a verifiable way  to know what exactly it was nor that it can be comprehended by our 4D mindset. 
 

You neither have nor can show anything else as being true. 
 

Try again, your fabrication has gotten stale. 
 

cormac

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, cormac mac airt said:

Something pre-existed, whatever that ultimately means, our universe. 

 

Yes, I know. Your claim is that that something created our universe. So provide verifiable evidence that your claim is true.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.