Unusual Tournament Posted November 20 #1 Share Posted November 20 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unusual Tournament Posted November 20 Author #2 Share Posted November 20 https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-says-it-shot-down-object-over-alaska-size-small-car-2023-02-10/ 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pellinore Posted November 20 #3 Share Posted November 20 2 hours ago, Unusual Tournament said: I'm sceptical about a lot of CTs about UFOs, but there is definitely something not told to the public. News outlets like the Guardian and Reuters usually ignore such things (unlike the Express and red tops) but they ran a story on the incident as well:Unidentified object shot down over Alaska by US military, White House says | US military | The Guardian 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unusual Tournament Posted November 20 Author #4 Share Posted November 20 8 minutes ago, pellinore said: I'm sceptical about a lot of CTs about UFOs, but there is definitely something not told to the public. News outlets like the Guardian and Reuters usually ignore such things (unlike the Express and red tops) but they ran a story on the incident as well:Unidentified object shot down over Alaska by US military, White House says | US military | The Guardian Yeah I’m kinda amazed more on how this just disappeared from the media for a long time. The fighter jets used half a million dollar missiles to shoot down “whether ballon’s” makes no sense 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hawken Posted November 20 #5 Share Posted November 20 1 hour ago, Unusual Tournament said: Yeah I’m kinda amazed more on how this just disappeared from the media for a long time. The fighter jets used half a million dollar missiles to shoot down “whether ballon’s” makes no sense An Aim Sidewinder missile cost well over $400k. A 20MM shell from a Vulcan cannon cost around $28 each which would be $2,800 per 100 shells. So, if they are just balloons, that's a waste of money with a missile. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Essan Posted November 20 #6 Share Posted November 20 3 hours ago, Hawken said: An Aim Sidewinder missile cost well over $400k. A 20MM shell from a Vulcan cannon cost around $28 each which would be $2,800 per 100 shells. So, if they are just balloons, that's a waste of money with a missile. Which is one very good reason for the USAF to sweep this sorry event well under the carpet. All that money to shoot down an amateur radio ham's toy balloon .... 🤣 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unusual Tournament Posted November 20 Author #7 Share Posted November 20 6 hours ago, Hawken said: An Aim Sidewinder missile cost well over $400k. A 20MM shell from a Vulcan cannon cost around $28 each which would be $2,800 per 100 shells. So, if they are just balloons, that's a waste of money with a missile. Exactly! My point. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Golden Duck Posted November 21 #8 Share Posted November 21 18 hours ago, Hawken said: An Aim Sidewinder missile cost well over $400k. A 20MM shell from a Vulcan cannon cost around $28 each which would be $2,800 per 100 shells. So, if they are just balloons, that's a waste of money with a missile. There are explanations from former fighter pilots on YouTube. CW Lemoine is one you could listen to. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+joc Posted November 21 #9 Share Posted November 21 23 minutes ago, Golden Duck said: There are explanations from former fighter pilots on YouTube. CW Lemoine is one you could listen to. 23 minutes ago, Golden Duck said: CW Lemoine is one you could should listen to. Fixed that for you! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+joc Posted November 21 #10 Share Posted November 21 20 hours ago, Unusual Tournament said: Yeah I’m kinda amazed more on how this just disappeared from the media for a long time. The fighter jets used half a million dollar missiles to shoot down “whether ballon’s” makes no sense Quote The fighter jets used half a million dollar missiles to shoot down “whether ballon’s” makes no sense to me because I don't know anything about it. Fixed that for you! 2 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Golden Duck Posted November 21 #11 Share Posted November 21 3 hours ago, joc said: Fixed that for you! Thank you. It's so weird some people think they know what goes on in a fighter. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+joc Posted November 21 #12 Share Posted November 21 (edited) 4 hours ago, Golden Duck said: Thank you. It's so weird some people think they know what goes on in a fighter. Am I the only one who took the time to find and watch the video? Thanks for not posting it. Losers should remain losers unless they have such a great desire to be winners that they do the hard work themselves! EDIT: Guys! I'm talking about losers as in loosing the argument okay...not like in life or anything (although it's true there as well) Edited November 21 by joc 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Earl.Of.Trumps Posted November 22 #13 Share Posted November 22 On 11/20/2023 at 3:17 AM, Unusual Tournament said: Yeah I’m kinda amazed more on how this just disappeared from the media for a long time. The fighter jets used half a million dollar missiles to shoot down “whether ballon’s” makes no sense “whether ballon’s” makes no sense I hear ya, and "weather balloons" isn't much better 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Earl.Of.Trumps Posted November 22 #14 Share Posted November 22 Here is my brief opinion: There is no way I can believe that - A] the object was under control of anything but the wind, and B] It is ET in origin. We(humans) cannot shoot down et UFO's. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dejarma Posted November 22 #15 Share Posted November 22 47 minutes ago, Earl.Of.Trumps said: Here is my brief opinion: There is no way I can believe that - A] the object was under control of anything but the wind, and B] It is ET in origin. We(humans) cannot shoot down et UFO's. therefore the thing shot down was not ET controlled then? did you mean to say this? i'm confused 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Earl.Of.Trumps Posted November 22 #16 Share Posted November 22 1 minute ago, Dejarma said: therefore the thing shot down was not ET controlled then? did you mean to say this? i'm confused Correct. I don't believe it was ET controlled. And - yes, I can tell you are confused. lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+joc Posted November 22 #17 Share Posted November 22 3 minutes ago, Dejarma said: therefore the thing shot down was not ET controlled then? did you mean to say this? i'm confused 3 minutes ago, Dejarma said: There is no way I can believe that - A] the object was under control of anything but the wind, and B] It is ET in origin. We(humans) cannot shoot down et UFO's. Translation: I believe that the object was controlled by the wind. I do not believe it is ET in origin...because...if were ET...We humans couldn't even shoot it down, no way, Jose'! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dejarma Posted November 22 #18 Share Posted November 22 2 minutes ago, joc said: Translation: I believe that the object was controlled by the wind. I do not believe it is ET in origin...because...if were ET...We humans couldn't even shoot it down, no way, Jose'! oh right, yeah, you're good at this translation malarkey. I should read more 😁 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unusual Tournament Posted November 22 Author #19 Share Posted November 22 32 minutes ago, Earl.Of.Trumps said: Correct. I don't believe it was ET controlled. And - yes, I can tell you are confused. lol How do you know? Where is the camera footage from the F-35? Where is the debris? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Earl.Of.Trumps Posted November 22 #20 Share Posted November 22 21 hours ago, Unusual Tournament said: How do you know? Where is the camera footage from the F-35? Where is the debris? Ok, UT, I don't know, as *fact*, but let's face it, a UFO that is *intelligently*flown has never been shot down by anybody (that I know of) Now, please do not construe the military's not making the public privy to the F-35 footage/debris to mean that they are hiding ET evidence. I really can't go there. PS: The one I was curious about was the cylindrical one 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unusual Tournament Posted November 23 Author #21 Share Posted November 23 (edited) 17 minutes ago, Earl.Of.Trumps said: Ok, UT, I don't know, as *fact*, but let's face it, a UFO that is *intelligently*flown has never been shot down by anybody (that I know of) Now, please do not construe the military's not making the public privy to the F-35 footage/debris to mean that they are hiding ET evidence. I really can't go there. PS: The one I was curious about was the cylindrical one You don’t know what the government has or has not shot down. It’s a simple question and a right for all citizens to know what got shot down and where is the wreckage Edited November 23 by Unusual Tournament 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Earl.Of.Trumps Posted November 23 #22 Share Posted November 23 21 minutes ago, Unusual Tournament said: You don’t know what the government has or has not shot down. Yes, I agree. But I think about what the UFO in Battle of LA took, and I get the feeling that no UFO's can be brought down with our armament, 21 minutes ago, Unusual Tournament said: It’s a simple question and a right for all citizens to know what got shot down and where is the wreckage The Air Traffic Controllers in the US and Canada have been brought to court under the FOIA doctrine, to seek radar images, The military claims it is a "National Security" issue, and that ends it. What the heck good is FOIA? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Essan Posted November 23 #23 Share Posted November 23 14 hours ago, Unusual Tournament said: You don’t know what the government has or has not shot down. It’s a simple question and a right for all citizens to know what got shot down and where is the wreckage I supposed the owners of the pico balloon might have a case for asking for the remains back, albeit they'll have no use for it now. But why spend money sending an expedition into the wilderness looking for it anyway? Could takes weeks or month to find! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unusual Tournament Posted November 23 Author #24 Share Posted November 23 3 hours ago, Essan said: I supposed the owners of the pico balloon might have a case for asking for the remains back, albeit they'll have no use for it now. But why spend money sending an expedition into the wilderness looking for it anyway? Could takes weeks or month to find! So it was enough to spend a 1 million dollars tracking, dispatching a F-35 and firing a half million dollar missile at just not important enough to examine is the ‘ballon’ was worth the threat evaluation? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trelane Posted November 23 #25 Share Posted November 23 This is just stupid. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now