Keir Starmer victory would be ‘catastrophic’: Dr Jordan Peterson.

[L.A.T.1961]

Strong comments from Peterson. 

 “I believe that Labour, like the socialist parties in Canada, is absolutely overwhelmed by the diversity, equity and inclusivity victim-victimiser narrative types,” Dr Peterson said.

“And that even if Starmer himself has any sense, which I doubt, the probability that his minions will lay waste to the UK – it’s certain in my estimation.

 

https://www.skynews.com.au/opinion/piers-morgan/keir-starmer-victory-would-be-catastrophic-dr-jordan-peterson/video/bddee22e93c2b0abf4d58c81c2db4ccd 

[Sir Wearer of Hats]

Yes, because the open corruption of the Tory government (such as repeatedly giving money to multiple firms with no employees other than Tory party member/family/friends), flaunting their own rules, writing their own laws to defend themselves etc is SO MUCH BETTER. 

[pellinore]

19 minutes ago, Sir Wearer of Hats said:

Yes, because the open corruption of the Tory government (such as repeatedly giving money to multiple firms with no employees other than Tory party member/family/friends), flaunting their own rules, writing their own laws to defend themselves etc is SO MUCH BETTER. 

If the UK becomes less corrupt, stopped bunging tax-payers money to cronies, and also reverted to having a government which put the country first, Brexit will have been pointless. We would have suffered the fat clown Boris Bunter with his bare faced corruption, the arch-dumbo Lord Frost, the brain-dead Liz Truss and the oily Fishy Rishi for nothing.

[Unusual Tournament]

Can’t see how a labour government would do any worse than the Tories when it comes to immigration 

[L.A.T.1961]

19 hours ago, Unusual Tournament said:

Can’t see how a labour government would do any worse than the Tories when it comes to immigration 

A spell out of office for the Tories might encourage those who would fit better in the LibDems or Labour party to change their elegancies or find something more productive to do. 😉

[itsnotoutthere]

On 1/13/2024 at 10:28 PM, Unusual Tournament said:

Can’t see how a labour government would do any worse than the Tories when it comes to immigration 

Keir Starmer says....."hold my beer"

Edited January 15 by itsnotoutthere

[itsnotoutthere]

On 1/13/2024 at 10:28 PM, Unusual Tournament said:

Can’t see how a labour government would do any worse than the Tories when it comes to immigration 

One of the main pull-factors with illegal immigration is that they believe (rightly) they can claim benefits if they reach Britain’s shores. Partly because in 2003 activist lawyers successfully challenged the Labour government’s decision to bar asylum seekers from claiming benefits. The legislation was intended to prevent people abusing the system – they would overstay their visas, falsely claim asylum and enjoy benefits whilst they spent years establishing their claims. A young plain Mister Keir Starmer QC was the lawyer who won the right for them to claim benefits.

In response to the judgement, the then Home Secretary David Blunkett despaired:

“I am personally fed up with having to deal with the situation where Parliament debates issues and the judges overturn them.”

Just as with the Rwanda policy, Keir and the liberal legal establishment sided against Parliament and the elected government.

https://order-order.com/2023/03/14/leftie-lawyer-starmer-won-landmark-benefits-for-fake-asylum-seekers-case/

Edited January 15 by itsnotoutthere

[Unusual Tournament]

33 minutes ago, itsnotoutthere said:

Keir Starmer says....."hold my beer"

He said that?

[Setton]

2 hours ago, itsnotoutthere said:

Just as with the Rwanda policy, Keir and the liberal legal establishment sided against Parliament and the elected government.

....by siding with the law.