L.A.T.1961 Posted March 19 #26 Share Posted March 19 9 minutes ago, Setton said: It was sent out instead of a current one because she's still recovering from surgery. Jeez, conspiracy theorists really need to recognise how insignificant their theories are to everyone else. She must be in a bit of a state if she cannot sit in a chair and smile ? 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duke Wellington Posted March 19 Author #27 Share Posted March 19 They are saying the recent picture of Kate and William has a Kate body double. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Setton Posted March 19 #28 Share Posted March 19 (edited) 23 minutes ago, L.A.T.1961 said: She must be in a bit of a state if she cannot sit in a chair and smile ? Or she doesn't want to be photographed knackered and it hurts to sit up after abdominal surgery. Wild, I know. Much more likely she's been bumped off for an imaginary affair and replaced with a body double. Edited March 19 by Setton 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrimsonKing Posted March 19 #29 Share Posted March 19 5 hours ago, Saru said: Yeah even this has become the subject of conspiracy theories with people on social media claiming that the footage does not show William and Kate. It's incredible how one photograph can cause such a PR nightmare for the royals. Meanwhile poor ol red and his dingbat floozy can't get that kind of attention if he turned around and knocked the hell outta her on a red carpet somewhere screaming leave us alone! 🤣 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+joc Posted March 19 #30 Share Posted March 19 There is no reason to cover up the death of King Charles or Kate. But rumors sell media...so...there you go. Nobody died, because if they did...everyone would know. If everyone doesn't know...it's just a scam attempting to sell something. Like Spam calls...if someone you don't know calls you....it's for one reason only...because they want to sell you something. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pellinore Posted March 19 #31 Share Posted March 19 4 hours ago, Setton said: It was sent out instead of a current one because she's still recovering from surgery. Jeez, conspiracy theorists really need to recognise how insignificant their theories are to everyone else. Body doubles? Or photos or footage supplied to British media with instructions to cover up what is really going on? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Setton Posted March 19 #32 Share Posted March 19 41 minutes ago, pellinore said: Body doubles? Or photos or footage supplied to British media with instructions to cover up what is really going on? Or, now hear me out however crazy this sounds: A middle aged woman who's just had major surgery and doesn't feel up to being trotted out for the public to satisfy some nutty conspiracy theorists. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pellinore Posted March 19 #33 Share Posted March 19 (edited) 15 minutes ago, Setton said: Or, now hear me out however crazy this sounds: A middle aged woman who's just had major surgery and doesn't feel up to being trotted out for the public to satisfy some nutty conspiracy theorists. The taxpayers pay the Duke and Duchess a lot of money- about £130k per hour, each. And she can't be bothered to speak honestly to them? Why not? Is she really so much better than ordinarily people? Is it the public that are stupid, or them? The RF are the biggest benefit scroungers in the UK- and we are expected to lap it up. Statistics reported on by The Telegraph show the heir to the throne carried out just 172 engagements this year, which amounts to less than one month full-time equivalent work. His wife Princess Kate did even less at just 123. Engagements last an average of an hour, though some are even shorter. Campaign group Republic has said this means the UK effectively hands William more than £127,000 an hour while the Duchy of Cornwall – a public asset owned by the Crown – will pay him an income of more than £22 million a year. Prince William 'paid more than £127,000 an hour by taxpayers' | The National Edited March 19 by pellinore Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pellinore Posted March 19 #34 Share Posted March 19 5 hours ago, L.A.T.1961 said: She must be in a bit of a state if she cannot sit in a chair and smile ? @Setton simultaneously believes she may be too ill to sit up and smile, but also be well enough to enjoy a day at a farm shop. Well enough to photoshop, but too weak to personally explain why she did it. I think- she will do anything to keep the £130k per hour and the £22 million per year- except bother with the tiresome proles. The RF are the only benefit cheats who can operate in broad daylight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OpenMindedSceptic Posted March 19 #35 Share Posted March 19 15 hours ago, pellinore said: They cost a fortune. The public own them, so of course they are interested in what they get up to. If they dropped out of public life and earned their own living, people would soon forget them. They are paying more back than they get from us. Approx £3Bn over the last decade paid by Crown Estates into the coffers, cost in 22/23 was £86M in sovereign grants.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+susieice Posted March 19 #36 Share Posted March 19 Now it's Queen Elizabeth II. The photo of Kate and William taken at the farm market on Saturday is also in this link if someone wants to scrutinize it. Kate’s photo of late Queen was doctored, agency says, as princess spotted in public for first time in months | CNN 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pellinore Posted March 19 #37 Share Posted March 19 6 minutes ago, OpenMindedSceptic said: They are paying more back than they get from us. Approx £3Bn over the last decade paid by Crown Estates into the coffers, cost in 22/23 was £86M in sovereign grants.. Don't be ridiculous. How can anyone pay back more than they earn? No one can, not Bill Gates, Elon Musk or Mark Zuckerberg. The only difference between genuine entrepreneurs and the RF is that the RF doesn't generate money, they get it from the UK taxpayers. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pellinore Posted March 19 #38 Share Posted March 19 2 minutes ago, susieice said: Now it's Queen Elizabeth II. The photo of Kate and William taken at the farm market on Saturday is also in this link if someone wants to scrutinize it. Kate’s photo of late Queen was doctored, agency says, as princess spotted in public for first time in months | CNN At this stage, I would not be at all surprised to see the Royal Family releasing photos of Liz (who I actually respected) enjoying a day out somewhere and saying everything is fine. And then saying, sorry, oops, easy mistake to make, she is deceased. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OpenMindedSceptic Posted March 19 #39 Share Posted March 19 1 minute ago, pellinore said: Don't be ridiculous. How can anyone pay back more than they earn? No one can, not Bill Gates, Elon Musk or Mark Zuckerberg. The only difference between genuine entrepreneurs and the RF is that the RF doesn't generate money, they get it from the UK taxpayers. Seriously? We pay them tax through Sovereign Grants. The Royal family has to generate cash off that money through the Crown Estates. They get taxed on the profits at something like 80%, they are the most taxed 'business' percentage-wise in the UK. That tax has generated £3Bn in revenues over the last 10 years into the system. Last year, net performance were about £400M. I cannot believe you do not understand how this works. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pellinore Posted March 19 #40 Share Posted March 19 5 minutes ago, OpenMindedSceptic said: I cannot believe you do not understand how this works. I can't believe you don't understand simple maths. If the RF generated money, why would they cost us, the taxpayers, a single penny? Do you think the US gives Bill Gates, Elon Musk or Jeff Bezos US taxpayers money to help them? Do you believe they are subsidized? Of course not. If the RF generated money, there would be news of their donations all the time- they could subsidise HS2, build new social homes, etc. They are just like the US entrepreneurs, but they don't get their money from customers, they get it from taxpayers. Sucked away from us so they can take private plane trips and helicopter flights and lifelong holidays. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TigerBright19 Posted March 20 #41 Share Posted March 20 This speech says it all. Does anyone believe King Charles is suitable for this position? Also does this speech signify the importance of press censorship? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kenemet Posted March 20 #42 Share Posted March 20 16 hours ago, pellinore said: Photoshopping a family portrait is at best manipulative, at worst an attempt to lie to the public. People have had enough of lies. And I am sure some people are just reTweeting the CTs just for fun. People do it all the time. I've fixed family photos that I felt were faded from age or had problems on them. I even adjust things with photoshop. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+susieice Posted March 20 #43 Share Posted March 20 Prince Archie's baptism picture has now been flagged. Picture agency flags ANOTHER photo of the royals as Prince Archie's christening snap is said to have been 'digitally enhanced' despite photographer's denial | Daily Mail Online Prince Archie's christening snap was 'digitally enhanced' as picture agency withdraws ANOTHER royal photo | The US Sun (the-sun.com) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pellinore Posted March 20 #44 Share Posted March 20 5 minutes ago, susieice said: Prince Archie's baptism picture has now been flagged. Picture agency flags ANOTHER photo of the royals as Prince Archie's christening snap is said to have been 'digitally enhanced' despite photographer's denial | Daily Mail Online Prince Archie's christening snap was 'digitally enhanced' as picture agency withdraws ANOTHER royal photo | The US Sun (the-sun.com) That's what happens when you get caught lying. People distrust anything you say afterwards. I predict a pretty severe backlash against William and Kate- worse than against Andrew and Harry and Meghan. Let's face it, we are going through the worst austerity since WW2, and still giving millions to our Number One benefits grifters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OpenMindedSceptic Posted March 20 #45 Share Posted March 20 8 hours ago, pellinore said: I can't believe you don't understand simple maths. If the RF generated money, why would they cost us, the taxpayers, a single penny? Do you think the US gives Bill Gates, Elon Musk or Jeff Bezos US taxpayers money to help them? Do you believe they are subsidized? Of course not. If the RF generated money, there would be news of their donations all the time- they could subsidise HS2, build new social homes, etc. They are just like the US entrepreneurs, but they don't get their money from customers, they get it from taxpayers. Sucked away from us so they can take private plane trips and helicopter flights and lifelong holidays. The RF aren't allowed to just decide how the money gets sorted out. On your point of donations, they don't donate. They run businesses through the crown estates that generate netbretyrns to the coffers for all.of us and they pay tax at about 80%. It's a similar principle of you buy shares in a company and then getting paid dividends on profits. I am gobsmacked you can't figure out how this works. We pay tax, that pays sovereign grants to crown estates, Crown estates invests and returns 80% of the profits. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pellinore Posted March 21 #46 Share Posted March 21 (edited) It now turns out the person who bought and published the farm shop video is not certain it is of her. Told you. TMZ's Charles Latibeaudiere shared his Kate doubts. One of the executive producers of TMZ has shared their thoughts that the person in the clip isn't Kate, despite the company running the footage. Video captured at the Windsor Farm Shop on Saturday shows Kate walking alongside Prince William as the pair embarked on a casual outing close to their home. Kate Middleton farm shop video 'isn't her' claims producer who bought video from onlooker - Mirror Online Edited March 21 by pellinore 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duke Wellington Posted March 22 Author #47 Share Posted March 22 On 3/21/2024 at 9:33 AM, pellinore said: It now turns out the person who bought and published the farm shop video is not certain it is of her. Told you. TMZ's Charles Latibeaudiere shared his Kate doubts. One of the executive producers of TMZ has shared their thoughts that the person in the clip isn't Kate, despite the company running the footage. Video captured at the Windsor Farm Shop on Saturday shows Kate walking alongside Prince William as the pair embarked on a casual outing close to their home. Kate Middleton farm shop video 'isn't her' claims producer who bought video from onlooker - Mirror Online In the Sun picture don`t they both look a bit young? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pellinore Posted March 22 #48 Share Posted March 22 Just now, Duke Wellington said: In the Sun picture don`t they both look a bit young? I haven't seen any of the pictures people have talked about, but it is possible something like the plot of the Stepford Wives is taking place with the RF- they will never age, and never need money ever again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duke Wellington Posted March 22 Author #49 Share Posted March 22 (edited) 25 minutes ago, pellinore said: I haven't seen any of the pictures people have talked about, but it is possible something like the plot of the Stepford Wives is taking place with the RF- they will never age, and never need money ever again. Further up this page. I`m going for he beat her up for an affair, broke her ribs, she needed surgery to fix them. Edited March 22 by Duke Wellington Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Essan Posted March 22 #50 Share Posted March 22 34 minutes ago, Duke Wellington said: Further up this page. I`m going for he beat her up for an affair, broke her ribs, she needed surgery to fix them. I reckon it was Charles she was having the affair with All that cancer nonsense was just a cover for when William blasted him with a shotgun ..... 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts