Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -

Kyle Rittenhouse Abandons Q&A After Being Confronted About Organizer's Racist Remarks


Grim Reaper 6

Recommended Posts

Kyle Rittenhouse stormed offstage after facing protesters’ jeers during an event at the University of Memphis on Wednesday night. Rittenhouse was invited to speak on the Second Amendment and the “lies of Black Lives Matter” by the campus chapter of conservative student group Turning Point USA, but students who spoke to local Tennessee outlet Action News 5 say Rittenhouse went directly into Q&A mode at the event, where things then descended into chaos The questioner listed some of Kirk’s comments, reminding people how the vanguard of the young MAGA movement denounced Juneteenth and Martin Luther King Jr. Day, called Supreme Court Justice Kentanji Brown Jackson an affirmative action hire, and, most recently, said he doubts the qualifications of Black airplane pilots.

Kyle Rittenhouse Abandons Q&A After Being Confronted About Organizer's Racist Remarks (msn.com)

 

  • Like 4
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yup, he ran out of there like his ass was on fire. Good thing he didn't have his assault rifle to shoot the student, and claim self defence.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
  • Confused 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Hankenhunter said:

Yup, he ran out of there like his ass was on fire. Good thing he didn't have his assault rifle to shoot the student, and claim self defence.

It's not like one person ambushed him after threatening to kill him, a second person hitting him over the head with a skateboard after being on the ground, and a third person pulling a handgun they legally were not allowed to own on him.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, DarkHunter said:

It's not like one person ambushed him after threatening to kill him, a second person hitting him over the head with a skateboard after being on the ground, and a third person pulling a handgun they legally were not allowed to own on him.

You forgot Jump Kick man sandwiched between the skateboard assault and the gun being aimed at Rittenhouse. 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, DarkHunter said:

It's not like one person ambushed him after threatening to kill him, a second person hitting him over the head with a skateboard after being on the ground, and a third person pulling a handgun they legally were not allowed to own on him.

Did he have his assault rifle on him when he was attacked?

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Hankenhunter said:

Yup, he ran out of there like his ass was on fire. Good thing he didn't have his assault rifle to shoot the student, and claim self defence.

The guy is coward, a man would have answered the questions, I mean that's what he was being paid to do!!!:no:

  • Like 3
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
16 minutes ago, Hankenhunter said:

Did he have his assault rifle on him when he was attacked?

Does legally holding a gun (as Rittenhouse was proven to have done in court) justify someone threatening to kill Rittenhouse, and then grabbing his gun to try and carry out that threat.... then, being hit over the head by a skateboard while on the ground, then being kicked with a jump kick while trying to stand up, and then having a gun pointed at his head (and though Rittenhouse was not aware of it, Grosskreutz was carrying this gun illegally, unlike Rittenhouse's lawful use). 

 

Edited by Paranoid Android
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Paranoid Android said:

Does legally holding a gun (as Rittenhouse was proven to have done in court) justify someone threatening to kill Rittenhouse, and then grabbing his gun to try and carry out that threat.... then, being hit over the head by a skateboard while on the ground, then being kicked with a jump kick while trying to stand up, and then having a weapon pointed at his head (and though Rittenhouse was not aware of it, this gun was not legally carried, Grosskreutz did not have the correct paperwork for his gun. 

 

And he deserved every bit of it, in fact he is lucky to be alive.:yes: If he had kept his young ass home instead of trying to be hero, none of it would have happened and the person he killed would still be alive today. He brought the entire situation on himself, that's why civilians who are untrained in crowd control and firearms use should not involve  themselves in police matters!:no:

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, Grim Reaper 6 said:

And he deserved every bit of it, in fact he is lucky to be alive.:yes: If he had kept his young ass home instead of trying to be hero, none of it would have happened and the person he killed would still be alive today. He brought the entire situation on himself, that's why civilians who are untrained in crowd control and firearms use should not involve  themselves in police matters!:no:

I'm curious, if a woman is raped, do you blame her for wearing certain clothes? Or do you rightfully blame the rapist for being a violent jerk who should be castrated. 

Edited by Paranoid Android
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Paranoid Android said:

I'm curious, if a woman is raped, do you blame her for wearing certain clothes? Or do you rightfully blame the rapist for being a violent jerk who should be castrated. 

That has nothing to do with an 18-year boy crossing states with an assault rifle and killing someone!

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Grim Reaper 6 said:

That has nothing to do with an 18-year boy crossing states with an assault rifle

That's legal! If you don't like it campaign to change the law, don't hold him responsible for doing what the law allows! Otherwise it is precisely like blaming a woman for being raped. A woman going out on a town legally should have every legal protection, right? We should NEVER blame the victim for being attacked, right? 

 

Just now, Grim Reaper 6 said:

and killing someone!

Not relevant to the previous comments. If Rittenhouse wasn't attacked, no one would have been killed. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Kyle tried that in Canada, he'd have a hockey stick permanently embedded in his ass. Also called a dirty dangle.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, Paranoid Android said:

That's legal! If you don't like it campaign to change the law, don't hold him responsible for doing what the law allows! Otherwise it is precisely like blaming a woman for being raped. A woman going out on a town legally should have every legal protection, right? We should NEVER blame the victim for being attacked, right? 

 

Not relevant to the previous comments. If Rittenhouse wasn't attacked, no one would have been killed. 

Did you get bullied a lot in school? Do you have a yearning to be a Cop but couldn't pass the physical? Because damn, you're sure an authoritarian. 

Edited by Hankenhunter
  • Like 3
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
42 minutes ago, Paranoid Android said:

That's legal! If you don't like it campaign to change the law, don't hold him responsible for doing what the law allows! Otherwise it is precisely like blaming a woman for being raped. A woman going out on a town legally should have every legal protection, right? We should NEVER blame the victim for being attacked, right?

Crossing state lines with an assault is not legal, and the law under normal circumstances does not allow. In no way was Rittenhouse a victim and without political maneuvering behind scenes he would be in prison.

42 minutes ago, Paranoid Android said:

Not relevant to the previous comments. If Rittenhouse wasn't attacked, no one would have been killed. 

I love it when you make ridiculous here, it proves and that is people should not participate in conversation with no knowledge of a countries law on a given issue. However, thanks for the laugh, I need to laugh today!!!🤡

Edited by Grim Reaper 6
  • Like 3
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Hankenhunter said:

Did he have his assault rifle on him when he was attacked?

First off an AR-15 is not an assault rifle, the far left keeps claiming that but it is false.

He had an AR-15 that he was legally allowed to have on him, no different then any other legal defensive instrument. 

Ultimately he was ambushed by a man who hours early threatened to kill him then chased by a mob with violent intent towards police and was forced to defend himself

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Hankenhunter said:

Did you get bullied a lot in school? Do you have a yearning to be a Cop but couldn't pass the physical? Because damn, you're sure an authoritarian. 

There is nothing authoritarian about his comments in my opinion, the problem is that he has no knowledge of gun laws in the United States, so he wings it!!!!!:lol:

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Grim Reaper 6 said:

Crossing state lines with an assault is not legal,

Pushing that lie again, what Rittenhouse did was not illegal.  Also for someone who claims to have served in the military you seem to have a lot of difficulty in understanding the difference between an AR-15 and a assault rifle

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, DarkHunter said:

First off an AR-15 is not an assault rifle, the far left keeps claiming that but it is false.

He had an AR-15 that he was legally allowed to have on him, no different then any other legal defensive instrument. 

Ultimately he was ambushed by a man who hours early threatened to kill him then chased by a mob with violent intent towards police and was forced to defend himself

And then let off scott free by a NRA backed Judiciary. Now he's a pariah, and broke to boot. Sucks to be him.

  • Thanks 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Hankenhunter said:

Did you get bullied a lot in school? Do you have a yearning to be a Cop but couldn't pass the physical? Because damn, you're sure an authoritarian. 

I'm actually anti-gun. I love that Australia has very strong gun control policies. We have these laws because our government made a change in 1996 after a mass shooting.

America hasn't changed their laws. If you don't like that it's legal to carry a gun, campaign to change the rules. God knows I'd support you on that. I really would, I think it's silly that people can carry a gun down the street of a town. But that's the law as it exists in Kenosha. Blaming Rittenhouse for being attacked while carrying a gun is the equivalent of blaming a rape victim for being raped! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Hankenhunter said:

And then let off scott free by a NRA backed Judiciary. Now he's a pariah, and broke to boot. Sucks to be him.

Cause the ruling didn't go the way you wanted it's because thr Judiciary was rigged, not because Rittenhouse just wasn't guilty 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Grim Reaper 6 said:

Crossing state lines with an assault is not legal, and the law under normal circumstances does not allow. In no way Rittenhouse victim and without political maneuvering behind scenes he would be in prison.

Cite the law, and explain why Rittenhouse was never charged with crossing State lines, otherwise you're just wrong on this one, mate. 

 

6 minutes ago, Grim Reaper 6 said:

I love it when you make ridiculous here, it proves and that is people should not participate in conversation with no knowledge of a countries law on a given issue. However, thanks for the laugh, I need to laugh today!!!🤡

Laugh all you like, Rittenhouse was found Not Guilty on the basis of Self Defence, because the law was on his side. If it wasn't he'd have been found guilty! 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DarkHunter said:

Cause the ruling didn't go the way you wanted it's because thr Judiciary was rigged, not because Rittenhouse just wasn't guilty 

Anyone who claims that the trial was rigged and not because Rittenhouse was innocent has clearly not watched the trial. The trial was a slam dunk for Rittenhouse, the prosecution looked second rate because they had no viable argument based on the law. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
11 minutes ago, DarkHunter said:

Pushing that lie again, what Rittenhouse did was not illegal.  Also for someone who claims to have served in the military you seem to have a lot of difficulty in understanding the difference between an AR-15 and a assault rifle

Potato, potatto. If he'd have kept his dum ass home none of this would have happened. But no, he chose to go strut his stuff expecting people to respect him. Instead he p***ed people off. Try that shiat in Canada. At the very least, his rifle would have been wrapped around a tree. 🇨🇦 Hes  a pants p***ing coward who's nothing without his weapon.

Edited by Hankenhunter
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Paranoid Android said:

Anyone who claims that the trial was rigged and not because Rittenhouse was innocent has clearly not watched the trial. The trial was a slam dunk for Rittenhouse, the prosecution looked second rate because they had no viable argument based on the law. 

It was very clearly self defence and obvious to anyone not politically motivated that Rittenhouse was innocent 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Hankenhunter said:

Potato, potatto. If he'd have kept his dum ass home none of this would have happened. But no, he chose to go strut his stuff expecting people to respect him. Instead he p***ed people off. Try that shiat in Canada. At the very least, his rifle would have been wrapped around a tree. 🇨🇦 

Canada has different laws, the argument we are making here is not relevant to what happens in Canada. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.