Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -

Judge went 'off the deep end' by letting violent Neo-Nazi off easy


Grim Reaper 6

Recommended Posts

I can't wait to go riot this year. Bringing the whole family.

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's pretty ironic the people who are sticking up for a wannabe dictator and a governmental transition that will be more authoritative than the US has ever seen.

Antifa are anti-fascists and these people against them, are unknowingly sticking up for fascists. So ironic.

  • Thanks 4
  • Confused 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, WVK said:

I bet we’ll be seeing more of them if Trump wins.

If trump loses will he instagate another inserection attempt?

So with trump involved there seems to always be riots

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DarkHunter said:

That is all you got, no matter how you spin in antifa was involved in some of the most if not most destructive riots in America 

And BOM caused most of them

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, the13bats said:

If trump loses will he instagate another inserection attempt?

So with trump involved there seems to always be riots

When Trump opens his mouth violence follows, whether it is phycological (Phone Threats) or physical.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, joseraul said:

It's pretty ironic the people who are sticking up for a wannabe dictator and a governmental transition that will be more authoritative than the US has ever seen.

Antifa are anti-fascists and these people against them, are unknowingly sticking up for fascists. So ironic.

Its very Ironic or is it moronic I think is a little of both. Anyone, who supports Donald Trump is either blind, deaf, or they are totally overlooking his behavior but no matter none of it is acceptable.:no:

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, DarkHunter said:

When proven wrong you resort to that garbage

Talk is cheap.  It was you who was proven wrong, and a sore loser to boot.

  • Thanks 2
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, the13bats said:

If trump loses will he instagate another inserection attempt?

So with trump involved there seems to always be riots

If a Biden win will lead to riots shouldn’t Biden stop out for the sake of the nation? 

as per Gromdor
 “I have this idea- why don't we not elect people that will cause our citizens to rebel and burn our own cities?”

 

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, WVK said:

If a Biden win will lead to riots shouldn’t Biden stop out for the sake of the nation? 

as per Gromdor
 “I have this idea- why don't we not elect people that will cause our citizens to rebel and burn our own cities?”

 

There hasn't been any riots caused by a Biden win.  There hasn't been any major riots at all under Biden.

There was a riot because of a Trump loss during Trump's presidency-  January 6 to be exact.  And Trump was yet again either powerless to deal with it or was the cause of it- depending on whether you ask a conservative or a liberal.

The Biden's administration did a good job prosecuting those that participated and showed the world the proper way to deal with riots when he got into office.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Gromdor said:

The Biden's administration did a good job prosecuting those that participated and showed the world the proper way to deal with riots when he got into office.

By prosecuting George Floyd rioters?

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, WVK said:

By prosecuting George Floyd rioters?

Alas, Biden's reach can only go back so far.  Prosecution of the George Floyd rioters would have fallen under the Trump presidency.  If Trump could have kept an attorney general long enough to prosecute those rioters, you wouldn't have to ask about them now.

It's why I told Darkhunter that it isn't surrender because those rioters have long since won.  

  • Like 2
  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Gromdor said:

Alas, Biden's reach can only go back so far. 

, Biden was in office Jan 2021. The Floyd riots started May 2020. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, WVK said:

, Biden was in office Jan 2021. The Floyd riots started May 2020. 

That is correct.  Trump and Barr had seven months to do something and failed.  

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, Gromdor said:

There hasn't been any riots caused by a Biden win.  There hasn't been any major riots at all under Biden.

There was a riot because of a Trump loss during Trump's presidency-  January 6 to be exact.  And Trump was yet again either powerless to deal with it or was the cause of it- depending on whether you ask a conservative or a liberal.

The Biden's administration did a good job prosecuting those that participated and showed the world the proper way to deal with riots when he got into office.

Who was responsible for the riots in DC in 2016 during Trumps inauguration?  Was that Obamas fault or Trumps?

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, Gromdor said:

There hasn't been any riots caused by a Biden win.  There hasn't been any major riots at all under Biden.

There was a riot because of a Trump loss during Trump's presidency-  January 6 to be exact.  And Trump was yet again either powerless to deal with it or was the cause of it- depending on whether you ask a conservative or a liberal.

The Biden's administration did a good job prosecuting those that participated and showed the world the proper way to deal with riots when he got into office.

So liberals riot when they don't get their way?  Gotcha....

So again, you advocate appeasement to keep liberals from rioting.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Edumakated said:

So liberals riot when they don't get their way?  Gotcha....

So again, you advocate appeasement to keep liberals from rioting.

You guys really don't understand how dumb you sound when you talk about appeasement.

Let's take the Floyd Riots-  They were rioting because an unarmed black man was killed.  Not killing unarmed black men would seem like a common sense solution to preventing future riots to normal people.  But no...  that would be appeasement.

Honestly, any decent leader should be doing things that appease his citizens and prevent them from rebelling.  

And why do you keep insisting that it is liberals that are the ones rioting and burning?  Is it more of your faith based legal decision making process?  You think they are all liberals so they must be?  It would explain why there was little to no prosecutions- Trump was probably chasing imaginary ghosts while the real apolitical anarchist rioters got away scot-free.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
15 minutes ago, Edumakated said:

Who was responsible for the riots in DC in 2016 during Trumps inauguration?  Was that Obamas fault or Trumps?

 

 

Obama if they weren't prosecuted. He was the head honcho at the time.  A quick google shows me that he did arrest around 200.  We can't really not vote him into that position again to prevent a future occurance, so it is rather moot

Edited by Gromdor
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Gromdor said:

You guys really don't understand how dumb you sound when you talk about appeasement.

Let's take the Floyd Riots-  They were rioting because an unarmed black man was killed.  Not killing unarmed black men would seem like a common sense solution to preventing future riots to normal people.  But no...  that would be appeasement.

Honestly, any decent leader should be doing things that appease his citizens and prevent them from rebelling.  

And why do you keep insisting that it is liberals that are the ones rioting and burning?  Is it more of your faith based legal decision making process?  You think they are all liberals so they must be?  It would explain why there was little to no prosecutions- Trump was probably chasing imaginary ghosts while the real apolitical anarchist rioters got away scot-free.

So because something happened that people didn't like that justified rioting?  Seriously?  That is your response?  Again, you are arguing to appease the mob.

The summer of love was liberals.  Stop playing dumb.  Antifa and BLM types aren't conservatives.  Funny how you all want to say Proud Boys are MAGA voters, but want to try to split hairs and try to claim Antifa / BLM aren't really liberal voters.

  • Like 3
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Gromdor said:

That is correct.  Trump and Barr had seven months to do something and failed.  

What did Biden do from Jan 2021 to May 2023. How many months is that?

Dates of d

 

George  Floyd’s riots

 

Tue, May 26, 2020 – Tue, May 2, 2023

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, DarkHunter said:

They will definitely come back out in force if Trump wins initially, if they continue to riot and burn down cities is another matter.  I suspect another Trump administration will not be as gentle and after the first hundred or so get locked up and charged with serious felonies I suspect the rest will begin to question how dedicated they are to the cause.  

That will mainly be up to local authorities so they will do all their rioting in democratic strongholds where they know prosecution tends to be weak.  

Back on the subject all violent offenders should be prosecuted and sentenced to the full extent allowable.  The problem is space in prisons.  The answer has to be something besides building more jails.  Our society is sick and needs healing.  God only knows how that can happen as violence begets more violence.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, the13bats said:

And BOM caused most of them

That's BLM. ;)  Fixed it for ya

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Gromdor said:

Alas, Biden's reach can only go back so far.  Prosecution of the George Floyd rioters would have fallen under the Trump presidency.

Only if it involved federal jurisdiction.  BLM riots were city and state.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, WVK said:

What did Biden do from Jan 2021 to May 2023. How many months is that?

Dates of d

 

George  Floyd’s riots

 

Tue, May 26, 2020 – Tue, May 2, 2023

 

Why nothing.  Do you have any suspects or evidence to give him?  We are a country of laws and if almost a year goes by with no evidence collected or suspects arrested, what can a new leader do?  The old leader pretty much pardoned them all with his inaction.

Don't get me wrong, but I am all for jailing rioters if you can successfully prosecute them.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, OverSword said:

That will mainly be up to local authorities so they will do all their rioting in democratic strongholds where they know prosecution tends to be weak.  

Back on the subject all violent offenders should be prosecuted and sentenced to the full extent allowable.  The problem is space in prisons.  The answer has to be something besides building more jails.  Our society is sick and needs healing.  God only knows how that can happen as violence begets more violence.

Ah, prison space.  Perhaps building camps will be the solution.  But then again wouldn't that make the whole "Trump is going to put people into camps" statement a reality?

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Gromdor said:

Ah, prison space.  Perhaps building camps will be the solution.  But then again wouldn't that make the whole "Trump is going to put people into camps" statement a reality?

It would.  No reason to believe that is on the table.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.